Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers

Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/)
-   Rules and Regulations and DAC, Oh My (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/rules-regulations-dac-oh-my-16/)
-   -   Company says accident was preventable/Need advice please (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/rules-regulations-dac-oh-my/28756-company-says-accident-preventable-need-advice-please.html)

CannedSpam 08-05-2007 04:12 AM

Company says accident was preventable/Need advice please
 
I was involved in an accident a couple months ago that was not my fault but the company I am currently employed with insists that it was preventable. What ,if any, recourse do I have to refute their claim outside of the company? Please anyone with some first hand knowledge of what actions to take in responce to this situation respond.

Uturn2001 08-05-2007 04:56 AM

What happened?

I also hate to burst your bubble, but the vast majority of accidents are considered preventable by the trucking companies, and if you take a cold, logical look at the accident/incident most are preventable in some fashion.

yoopr 08-05-2007 05:03 AM

this happened 3 months ago? Your odds of changing this is slim to none.

CannedSpam 08-05-2007 05:06 AM

I am not really looking to get into particulars about the accident, but I will say that the other motorist that struck the company truck that I was driving at the time was cited for failure to yeild. Anyone with some actual, intelligent
first-hand knowledge of such recourse a driver might have in such a circumstance as this please chime in. Thank you in advance.

CannedSpam 08-05-2007 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoopr
this happened 3 months ago? Your odds of changing this is slim to none.

I said a couple months ago. June 19,2007 if you must be technical about such things. The insurance and law enforcement have concluded that this was not an "at-fault " accident on my behalf, but after the fact the company I am currently employed with labeled this "preventable".

allan5oh 08-05-2007 05:27 AM

at-fault <> preventable, the other persons failure to yield is essentially irrelevant.

Could you have done anything reasonable to prevent this accident?

Did the vehicle "come out of nowhere"?

Uturn2001 08-05-2007 08:17 AM

The only thing you can do is appeal the decision through your company.

I would suggest however, that at the very least you sit down with them and have them explain how this accident is considered preventable.

Fozzy 08-05-2007 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CannedSpam
I am not really looking to get into particulars about the accident, but I will say that the other motorist that struck the company truck that I was driving at the time was cited for failure to yeild. Anyone with some actual, intelligent first-hand knowledge of such recourse a driver might have in such a circumstance as this please chime in. Thank you in advance.

I have plenty of experience with review boards.. I've sat on a few of them. The accident was reviewed by a group of drivers and the standards of preventable VS non-preventable are applied and the fact is that almost every accident is preventable in some way. The other driver can be totally at fault and not "yeild" to you, but if there is contact between your truck and the OV, you still probably could have done something to have prevented the collision. You are not "at fault", the accident was preventable.

nickbtubas 08-05-2007 02:58 PM

Ive sit in with review boards (they are boring).

they best and easy way to define an accident is as follows:

Preventable Accident: You were moving in some fashion and hit something or something hit you.


Non-Preventable Accident: You were motionless and something hit you..


You got to give us specifics on the accident to help us out. Plus you misfortune will probably help many new drivers just starting their career.


You also waited a long time to appeal the decision. a review board would be completed after the few weeks after the accident (1-3 weeks).

Ridge Runner 08-05-2007 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fozzy
Quote:

Originally Posted by CannedSpam
I am not really looking to get into particulars about the accident, but I will say that the other motorist that struck the company truck that I was driving at the time was cited for failure to yeild. Anyone with some actual, intelligent first-hand knowledge of such recourse a driver might have in such a circumstance as this please chime in. Thank you in advance.

I have plenty of experience with review boards.. I've sat on a few of them. The accident was reviewed by a group of drivers and the standards of preventable VS non-preventable are applied and the fact is that almost every accident is preventable in some way. The other driver can be totally at fault and not "yeild" to you, but if there is contact between your truck and the OV, you still probably could have done something to have prevented the collision. You are not "at fault", the accident was preventable.


I'm sorry to say that I'm LOST on this subject. I should know more about this kinda of thing as it could affect me sometime in the furture.Are there any "guide-lines" to go by? Any national standard? I can see a lot of room for abuse by the companies who want to keep their drivers from being able to leave for another company. If you you use the standard you described then everything is preventable. Two or three preventables and your chances of getting a job are close to slim to none.

Fredog 08-06-2007 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fozzy
Quote:

Originally Posted by CannedSpam
I am not really looking to get into particulars about the accident, but I will say that the other motorist that struck the company truck that I was driving at the time was cited for failure to yeild. Anyone with some actual, intelligent first-hand knowledge of such recourse a driver might have in such a circumstance as this please chime in. Thank you in advance.

I have plenty of experience with review boards.. I've sat on a few of them. The accident was reviewed by a group of drivers and the standards of preventable VS non-preventable are applied and the fact is that almost every accident is preventable in some way. The other driver can be totally at fault and not "yeild" to you, but if there is contact between your truck and the OV, you still probably could have done something to have prevented the collision. You are not "at fault", the accident was preventable.


I'm sorry to say that I'm LOST on this subject. I should know more about this kinda of thing as it could affect me sometime in the furture.Are there any "guide-lines" to go by? Any national standard? I can see a lot of room for abuse by the companies who want to keep their drivers from being able to leave for another company. If you you use the standard you described then everything is preventable. Two or three preventables and your chances of getting a job are close to slim to none.


example, you are driving along, car is coming out of side road, he stops at stop sign, looks at you and then goes and you cant stop and you hit him.. his fault, but preventable because you should have covered your brake and been prepared to stop./ this is how it was explained to me by an insurance rep. like you said, almost everything is considered preventable. I asked for an example of non-preventable, he said.. you are driving along and a meteorite falls on you, that is not preventable. so in other words.. in most cases you are SCREWED!! and no you dont get a kiss

Useless 08-06-2007 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
I'm sorry to say that I'm LOST on this subject. I should know more about this kinda of thing as it could affect me sometime in the furture.Are there any "guide-lines" to go by? Any national standard? I can see a lot of room for abuse by the companies who want to keep their drivers from being able to leave for another company. If you you use the standard you described then everything is preventable. Two or three preventables and your chances of getting a job are close to slim to none.

Just about, Ridge Runner!!

At the same time, there IS a difference between "Accountability" and "Culpability", and drivers DO need to understand that whether an accident or an incident is legally "their fault", the fact is that they have been trusted with somebody else's money, somebody else's asset, sombody else's cargo, and somebody else's "risk", and they have been entrusted to get from Point A to Point B with everything in tact.

The sooner a driver gets that burned into his head, the better chance he has of keeping everything in one piece.

Are there abuses?? Yes!!.....and IMHO, their should be some degree of accountability and repriasals for compqanies who wrongfully determine an accident to be "preventable".

Ridge Runner 08-06-2007 12:28 AM

OK. I guess what I'm getting at is : You have an accident. You are not at fault. Your comapny decides the accident was preventable. It goes on your DAC as a preventable. Does DAC also list it as you being NOT at fault? If a company pulls your DAC will they only see that you had x number of preventables without knowing what happened? Sorry, but I just don't see how in Freddogs example the driver should/could be charged with a preventable. Are we to have the ability to read other drivers minds? ( I'm talking about someone pulling out in front of you with NO room to stop.)

Fredog 08-06-2007 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
OK. I guess what I'm getting at is : You have an accident. You are not at fault. Your comapny decides the accident was preventable. It goes on your DAC as a preventable. Does DAC also list it as you being NOT at fault? If a company pulls your DAC will they only see that you had x number of preventables without knowing what happened? Sorry, but I just don't see how in Freddogs example the driver should/could be charged with a preventable. Are we to have the ability to read other drivers minds? ( I'm talking about someone pulling out in front of you with NO room to stop.)


not all companies would call it preventable. mine wouldnt, he was just giving examples of potential situations, I understand that dac will put anything a company says on your report and then you play hell trying to get it corrected.

Fredog 08-06-2007 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fredog
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
OK. I guess what I'm getting at is : You have an accident. You are not at fault. Your comapny decides the accident was preventable. It goes on your DAC as a preventable. Does DAC also list it as you being NOT at fault? If a company pulls your DAC will they only see that you had x number of preventables without knowing what happened? Sorry, but I just don't see how in Freddogs example the driver should/could be charged with a preventable. Are we to have the ability to read other drivers minds? ( I'm talking about someone pulling out in front of you with NO room to stop.)


not all companies would call it preventable. mine wouldnt, he was just giving examples of potential situations, I understand that dac will put anything a company says on your report and then you play hell trying to get it corrected.


you might find this interesting
http://www.speedingticketcentral.com/DAC.html

Part Time Dweller 08-06-2007 12:43 AM

Quote:

Are we to have the ability to read other drivers minds? ( I'm talking about someone pulling out in front of you with NO room to stop.)
Not mind reading, but reading the road. One of the major parts of defensive driving is paying attention to other traffic. If you see a vehicle approaching a stop you have to assume they aren't going to stop. Make eye contact, if they don't look your way expect them to pull out and make the necessary adjustments. That is what a professional does anyways, a steering wheel holder plays with the radio and cell phone with total disregard to others, then when involved in an accident, can't understand how it was preventable and accepts no personal responsibility for their inattention.

Ask one of many drivers that have a million plus accident free miles, it isn't just luck. And NO, I am not one of them, but have learned from my mistakes. One reason they do these accident reviews whether an accident is preventable or not is to teach drivers what they could have done to prevent it and learn from it.

yoopr 08-06-2007 12:44 AM

Sad to say but just about any accident a truck is involved in will most likely be classified Preventable.

Sabine 08-06-2007 12:46 AM

Gotta love that way of thinking. It is one thing to be screwed over by your company, but these review boards include drivers.

It is simple enough to find fault sitting in an office, and looking at diagrams or maybe a couple of pictures.

But those of you doing the reviewing, think about it, it is probably only by the grace of god you have avoided any and all collisions.

I can't even count how many times a week or even a day, I slam on my brakes to avoid someone trying to make an exit or other such thing. I keep my distance, try to drive defensively, but you cannot predict everyones behavior.

About a month ago, on my way to my pickup point the road was closed (in Harrisburg, PA), due to the fire dept. hanging up some banners. The road detoured to the left, so I made a left, and there is the low bridge ahead of me. Couldn't see the sign until I was half way into the turn, I stop, while I am turning.

The cop who was just standing there up until then, came over, told me he was stopping traffic, back up and wait for the mess to clear. No problem. I started to back up, when one of the cars to my right didn't feel like waiting anymore and whizzed behind me, only my guardian angle saved me on that one. I couldn't see him until I almost hit him. Yeah, preventable, I am sure, but the cop was stopping everyone, well, all but this guy.

Had there been a wreck, it would have been my fault, I am sure, employing the guide lines these boards use.

Part Time Dweller 08-06-2007 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sabine
only my guardian angle saved me on that one. I couldn't see him until I almost hit him. Yeah, preventable, I am sure, but the cop was stopping everyone, well, all but this guy.

It wasn't your guardian angel, it was you doing your job by paying attention. If you had hit the car, it would have been your fault, as you wouldn't have been paying attention. The reason you have had so many close calls is you do your job well.

Fozzy 08-06-2007 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sabine
Gotta love that way of thinking. It is one thing to be screwed over by your company, but these review boards include drivers.

It is simple enough to find fault sitting in an office, and looking at diagrams or maybe a couple of pictures.

But those of you doing the reviewing, think about it, it is probably only by the grace of god you have avoided any and all collisions.

I can't even count how many times a week or even a day, I slam on my brakes to avoid someone trying to make an exit or other such thing. I keep my distance, try to drive defensively, but you cannot predict everyones behavior.

About a month ago, on my way to my pickup point the road was closed (in Harrisburg, PA), due to the fire dept. hanging up some banners. The road detoured to the left, so I made a left, and there is the low bridge ahead of me. Couldn't see the sign until I was half way into the turn, I stop, while I am turning.

The cop who was just standing there up until then, came over, told me he was stopping traffic, back up and wait for the mess to clear. No problem. I started to back up, when one of the cars to my right didn't feel like waiting anymore and whizzed behind me, only my guardian angle saved me on that one. I couldn't see him until I almost hit him. Yeah, preventable, I am sure, but the cop was stopping everyone, well, all but this guy.

Had there been a wreck, it would have been my fault, I am sure, employing the guide lines these boards use.

In a majority of the boards I was on the simplt fact is that they are all preventable. MOST were backing accidents.. one of the others a guy ran over a pole.. One of the backing accidents was blamed on Mexicans working in the factory... We on these review boards know that newt week it could be us on the stack of papers.. it still doesn't change the criteria at all.

Sabine 08-06-2007 12:10 PM

ok guys, maybe I jumped the gun. I guess I have a problem with accidents declared preventable that involve me as a driver, legally driving, not running lights, not speeding.

And then some moron runs a light and hits me. In theory you should be prepared to stop, but if the legal speed is 65 (as it is on US 67 in MO, and there are several lights), I know it is not possible to stop for someone who is running the light. I don't do 65 thru these intersection, but I am not creeping at 35 either.

While you should always prepare yourself for the unexpected, some things truly can't be avoided. You can try, but no more than that.

kreeper01 08-06-2007 01:38 PM

Looks like this pretty much sums it up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickbtubas
Ive sit in with review boards (they are boring).

they best and easy way to define an accident is as follows:

Preventable Accident: You were moving in some fashion and hit something or something hit you.


Non-Preventable Accident: You were motionless and something hit you..


Useless 08-06-2007 02:45 PM

I think that many excellent points have been made here.

Reading the different perspectives offered here has caused me to go back and revisit my perspectives on this matter.

The issue of "prevetable vs. nonpreventable" are rather ambiguous, and it is easy for a safety officer or a review board to play "Monday Morning Quarterback" in making determinations.

There is a considerable degree of irony in that trying to apply "cut and dried" methods of determining preventability ro a matter that is so clearly ambiguous does seem to unfairly weigh upon the big truck driver.

What I also find ironic is the fact that labeling an incident as "preventable" would not only weigh aganst the driver, but also reflect negatively upon the company as a whole.

If a professional driver is going to be deemed "guilty untill proven innocent", then the driver should also be entitled to some type of representative to serve as his/her advocate.

As the father of a 12 yr. old child, my wife and me are currently dealing with issues such as "Fault" vs. "Accountability".

A classic example occured just a few weeks ago when my daughter's cell phone was ruined after she slipped and fell into a mud puddle after a thunderstorm had pounded us.

Was the destruction of her cell phone her fault?? Not really, although there WERE steps she could have taken to avoid it. There was also the matter of teaching her that although the incident may not have been her fault, the fact remained that her cell phone was ruined, and that it would cost money to replace.

In any event, threads such as these, which cause us to stop and thing, and look at things from different points of view can help all of us to become better drivers, and better at other things that we do as well.

That speaks well for everyone who posted here.

pacificjohn 08-06-2007 09:35 PM

Intelligent life?
 
Quote:

In any event, threads such as these, which cause us to stop and thing, and look at things from different points of view can help all of us to become better drivers, and better at other things that we do as well.

That speaks well for everyone who posted here.
HERE HERE!!! And yes...that was in all capitals for a reason! :D [/quote]

cmegobye 08-08-2007 04:45 AM

If the Titanic sank today, with the present definition of a P vs NP accident, a truck driver somewhere would at 'fault'.

papafish 08-08-2007 05:21 AM

heres a new twist...with a question.i had a rollover,and was charged with too fast for conditions.2 points and minimun fine.the facts are that i did rollover,but i was going less than 2 mph in sunny, dry ,clear condition.thank goodness for witnesses...the load,(steel racks in a reefer trailer) shifted on a curve at an exit ramp in rush hour traffic.the truck went over in slo motion.the racks actually burst thru the side of the trailer.they were not secured in any way,the bol was wrong in stating the actual weight of the load,and they were stacked higher than they should have been.why did i not check the load?we were not allowed to open the trailers for any reason...all are pre loaded and sealed...you open a door you get fired.....period..i was less than 300 yards from where i picked up the trailer and was on my way to axle out the load...it was not over gross...but the bill was still about 26,000lbs. short....i was injured on my left arm,workers comp. and all that good stuff........we were in the process of a bidding war to buy us out at the time......by the time i recovered,the court date had passed and the fine was lowered but not thrown out in spite of the fact that a company investigation found out all of the above problems had occured with the load thus causing me to roll over......i was cleared by my company,but the judge said it was preventable<though i dont know how).....i returned to work.....soon after,a large company i wont name for i might start a fight but we all know them,got the deal........we were all allowed to fill out apps.and bid for our jobs....so i did as i had been there 8 years......well,this new company refused my app. based on the fact that i had a rollover.period.....i have another job now...but my question is this.....with nearly 11 years driving with not so much as an overweight ticket,now i have this rollover with a fine on me,what will it take to get my self hired by a company that i might like better???how long does it take???

greg3564 08-08-2007 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papafish
heres a new twist...with a question.i had a rollover,and was charged with too fast for conditions.2 points and minimun fine.the facts are that i did rollover,but i was going less than 2 mph in sunny, dry ,clear condition.thank goodness for witnesses...the load,(steel racks in a reefer trailer) shifted on a curve at an exit ramp in rush hour traffic.the truck went over in slo motion.the racks actually burst thru the side of the trailer.they were not secured in any way,the bol was wrong in stating the actual weight of the load,and they were stacked higher than they should have been.why did i not check the load?we were not allowed to open the trailers for any reason...all are pre loaded and sealed...you open a door you get fired.....period..i was less than 300 yards from where i picked up the trailer and was on my way to axle out the load...it was not over gross...but the bill was still about 26,000lbs. short....i was injured on my left arm,workers comp. and all that good stuff........we were in the process of a bidding war to buy us out at the time......by the time i recovered,the court date had passed and the fine was lowered but not thrown out in spite of the fact that a company investigation found out all of the above problems had occured with the load thus causing me to roll over......i was cleared by my company,but the judge said it was preventable<though i dont know how).....i returned to work.....soon after,a large company i wont name for i might start a fight but we all know them,got the deal........we were all allowed to fill out apps.and bid for our jobs....so i did as i had been there 8 years......well,this new company refused my app. based on the fact that i had a rollover.period.....i have another job now...but my question is this.....with nearly 11 years driving with not so much as an overweight ticket,now i have this rollover with a fine on me,what will it take to get my self hired by a company that i might like better???how long does it take???

You need an attorney. One that specializes in vehicle code.

Raafi 09-03-2007 03:25 AM

i am a pretty new driver, and after reading this thread, it boils down to you drive as safe as you can, but when your time is up, you are just plain screwed

it makes no sense that an innocent person has to hire a lawyer based upon erroneous information that a company or review board puts on his record

am i justifying bad driving? no

i am just saying that it seems that innocent people get the shaft and it would just be better to try to make money doing something else.

i like driving, my father and uncles were drivers, i was taught as a youngster how to drive, i waited until i was 48yrs old to start and am enjoying myself every day

but i do dread the day that something happens, and someone gets hurt, or high value damage, i cant see myself pursuing going to court when the deck is stacked so high against me.

there are a few depressing things you learn as a truck driver, this thread has to be up there

mdgardner963 02-09-2008 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CannedSpam
I am not really looking to get into particulars about the accident, but I will say that the other motorist that struck the company truck that I was driving at the time was cited for failure to yeild. Anyone with some actual, intelligent
first-hand knowledge of such recourse a driver might have in such a circumstance as this please chime in. Thank you in advance.


We as pros are responsable for everyone and correcting there dum mistakes by not hitting them even when they hit us..

Now more over to your question if it is not your fault and you had no way of correrting the 4 wheelers mistake or could have taken evasive action to stop the accident. Then there is recourse 1 driver review board is 1st step, second step is if you think the driver review board is not going to see it you way.. Is to hire an atty and sue the company (sometimes just the threat from an atty will make them change it.) take your chances in court. At the very least i would get an attys comments on it and see what options you have..

Fredog 02-09-2008 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kreeper01
Looks like this pretty much sums it up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickbtubas
Ive sit in with review boards (they are boring).

they best and easy way to define an accident is as follows:

Preventable Accident: You were moving in some fashion and hit something or something hit you.


Non-Preventable Accident: You were motionless and something hit you..


still preventable, you should have been sitting somewhere else :D

mdgardner963 02-10-2008 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fredog
Quote:

Originally Posted by kreeper01
Looks like this pretty much sums it up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickbtubas
Ive sit in with review boards (they are boring).

they best and easy way to define an accident is as follows:

Preventable Accident: You were moving in some fashion and hit something or something hit you.


Non-Preventable Accident: You were motionless and something hit you..


still preventable, you should have been sitting somewhere else :D

Since i do not have all the facts means nothing.. If your not at fault then your not.

Fredog 02-10-2008 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdgardner963
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fredog
Quote:

Originally Posted by kreeper01
Looks like this pretty much sums it up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickbtubas
Ive sit in with review boards (they are boring).

they best and easy way to define an accident is as follows:

Preventable Accident: You were moving in some fashion and hit something or something hit you.


Non-Preventable Accident: You were motionless and something hit you..


still preventable, you should have been sitting somewhere else :D

Since i do not have all the facts means nothing.. If your not at fault then your not.


wonder who was at fault here?
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...3540/plane.jpg

golfhobo 02-15-2008 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Part Time Dweller
Quote:

Are we to have the ability to read other drivers minds? ( I'm talking about someone pulling out in front of you with NO room to stop.)
Not mind reading, but reading the road. One of the major parts of defensive driving is paying attention to other traffic. If you see a vehicle approaching a stop you have to assume they aren't going to stop. Make eye contact, if they don't look your way expect them to pull out and make the necessary adjustments. That is what a professional does anyways, a steering wheel holder plays with the radio and cell phone with total disregard to others, then when involved in an accident, can't understand how it was preventable and accepts no personal responsibility for their inattention.

Ask one of many drivers that have a million plus accident free miles, it isn't just luck. And NO, I am not one of them, but have learned from my mistakes. One reason they do these accident reviews whether an accident is preventable or not is to teach drivers what they could have done to prevent it and learn from it.

I know this post is old, and I don't always agree with PTD.... but this time I DO! A MAJOR part of the professional driver's job IS to "anticipate" the stupidity of other drivers!

We must ALWAYS be "on guard" for the actions of the stupid and irresponsible! There is NO time, while driving a truck, that it is safe to talk on the phone, diddle with your GPS, or read some papers!!

Being "at fault" in an accident makes NO difference! It is "preventable" because YOU should be doing your job! And your JOB requires that you understand the implications of letting your 80k lb missile hit another vehicle or pedestrian!

There IS a "double standard" and WE are held to it! That's why we are considered "professional drivers!" We MAY not be able to "prevent" EVERY accident..... but those we don't, MAY be fatal for someone else OR OURSELVES!

Personally, I am very GOOD at "reading the minds" of other drivers! And I make it my FIRST PRIORITY to do so all day, every day!! I ALWAYS know if I have an "out" and where it is, and I ALWAYS expect the 4wheelers (and most truckers) to do the most stupid thing they can do!

To the original poster..... there is a thread here somewhere with a link to USIS/DAC. You need to call them and find out how to have YOUR "rebuttal" added to the file so any future company will see YOUR side of the story. But, it better be GOOD, FACTUAL, and PERSUASIVE! Whining won't count!

Driving SAFELY is an ART, or at least a SKILL!! One should be practicing this art/skill EVERY mile that they cover! There is NO time to slack off! You are being paid to DRIVE A TRUCK!! The responsibilities and requirements of this job are STRINGENT to say the least! If you are not SMARTER than the average 4wheeler, nor more SKILLED than a "steeringwheelholder," you need to get OUT OF THIS BUSINESS!

I have a "rule." If you EVER say, "wow! where did HE come from?" more than ONCE a day.... you are NOT paying attention, you are NOT doing your job, and you are DANGEROUS!

I feel for those who have been "unjustly" screwed by company or LEO's, but I have NO pity for those who don't understand the GRAVITY of the situation, and the RESPONSIBILITY of the job! DO IT RIGHT.... or don't EVEN think you can DO it!!

I have no idea what kind of driver the O.P. is..... and I am not passing judgement! I am stating my opinions for ALL who desire to be a trucker! And NO, I don't have a million accident free miles YET.... but I INTEND to! It will be a bit harder for ME, because I don't get in the granny lane and follow the slower trucks! I am "proactive." I drive fast.... but I drive SMART! I am thinking WAY ahead of every mile I drive! I KNOW the capabilities/restrictions of my TRUCK, and I "know" what everyone else is going to do! And I leave ROOM for the possibility that I could be WRONG!

For those of you who don't HAVE this ability to think ahead, or to "read the minds" of others in traffic, I suggest you get in the granny lane AND spend ALL your time checking mirrors and the road in front of you! Maybe, if you're lucky, you will survive the trip! But, really.... I think you should find another career!

Driving a TRUCK is not something that just "anybody" can, or SHOULD, do! My last two "co-drivers" are clear examples of that! I'm sure there is no SHAME in coming to that realization. But, you MUST be honest with yourself and others when making that self-appraisal! LIVES can depend on it!! Maybe, even YOURS!

Nearly EVERY accident is "preventable" if you are driving a truck!! And hitting ANYTHING that is stationary, while trying to back in, or park, etc., is INEXCUSABLE! It MIGHT be "understandable" when you are six months NEW..... but it will COST you bigtime!

There is LITTLE, if ANY, room for mistakes in this business! And THAT is not just MY opinon.... that is a FACT!

wildkat 02-15-2008 02:01 AM

Hobo; spoken like the true professional you obviously are! WAY to GO! My thoughts exactly!

edited: damn it's hard to type with my wrist splints on LOL

golfhobo 02-15-2008 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wildkat
Hobo; spoken like the true professional you obviously are! WAY to GO! My thoughts exactly!

edited: damn it's hard to type with my wrist splints on LOL

Thanks, WildKat! Those words are GOLD from a "senior" driver like YOU! I KNOW I'm right..... but, it is nice to know that you appreciate my "professionalism."

I didn't get into this job to see how fast I could go while eating a sandwich! And I didn't get into this job because I had no ofther choice. I'm in this job because I KNOW I can be GOOD at it, and that means being "professional" at ALL times! If I was a street sweeper, I'd be the BEST at it! I believe strongly in being "professional" at any job, and THIS job REQUIRES it!

LIVES are at stake in this job, as you well know! We are not ringing up sales at a Walmart! Too many drivers think that if they can find 5th gear before they stall out, they are "driving a truck!" And with THAT mentality, they won't even, or EVER, realize that they are NO GOOD AT IT! No shame... no foul.... but they need to get OUT of it!

Truck driving is not, or SHOULDN'T be, a "catchall" for those who can't find their niche in life! This is NOT "fast food" or a "retail job."

This should NOT be a "last choice" for those who CAN'T.... but rather a "first choice" for those who CAN! Our industry will get stronger ONLY when the "enlistment" requirements reach a level of that of the better jobs in the military! I have been in BOTH, and I know a COOK from a Demolition Expert!

Sorry to get on a rant (again,) but I am passionate about this! Trucking is NOT FOR WUSSES! (just HAD to say that!) :lol:

Now..... WHAT have you been doing to need wrist splints? I thought that was a MALE thing! :lol:

mdgardner963 02-15-2008 04:07 PM

Ok i agree with 99% of what you said. But like i said i dont have all the facts and if i did then i could make a proper judgement.

I never assume anything any more.

But i totaly agree we are paid to watch out for the poor critters who can't think for them selfs :x

golfhobo 02-15-2008 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdgardner963
Ok i agree with 99% of what you said. But like i said i dont have all the facts and if i did then i could make a proper judgement.

I never assume anything any more.

But i totaly agree we are paid to watch out for the poor critters who can't think for them selfs :x

Yeah, but not ENOUGH!!! :lol: :lol:

I wasn't aiming anything at YOU MadDog. IIRC, you told the O.P. to get a lawyer or at least rebut the statements on DAC. I agree wholeheartedly with THAT! Personally, I pay monthly for a legal assistance group to do just THAT if I ever need them. I would NEVER just accept whatever the company wants to put on my DAC!

mdgardner963 02-15-2008 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfhobo
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdgardner963
Ok i agree with 99% of what you said. But like i said i dont have all the facts and if i did then i could make a proper judgement.

I never assume anything any more.

But i totaly agree we are paid to watch out for the poor critters who can't think for them selfs :x

Yeah, but not ENOUGH!!! :lol: :lol:

I wasn't aiming anything at YOU MadDog. IIRC, you told the O.P. to get a lawyer or at least rebut the statements on DAC. I agree wholeheartedly with THAT! Personally, I pay monthly for a legal assistance group to do just THAT if I ever need them. I would NEVER just accept whatever the company wants to put on my DAC!


I never took it personal at all.. And yes I have seen some shady companies I hear ya.. We are bound to a higher standard.. Those who think they can get away with driving irresponsible are just ignorant

ChikinTrucka 02-16-2008 08:21 PM

http://media.timesleader.com/images/...az+Crash+1.jpg
http://www.timesleader.com/news/Mult..._fatality.html
Anyone get caught in this snow squall last week? I wonder who is at fault? Everyone says "It was a sudden squall, out of nowhere, and all of a sudden, I couldn't see." Like all the accidents I hear about in the fog. Part of the job is knowing when to slow down because of what's anticipated. For example; I take my sunglasses off BEFORE entering a tunnel, I clean my windshield BEFORE turning into the setting sun, I slow down BEFORE entering fog, and I turn on my wipers BEFORE entering sever rainstorm.
The part I don't like is that no matter how careful you are, and well intentioned, there will always be the unforeseen incident.
SO, in order to avoid any "preventable" accident, we all need to drive at 5 MPH. (Of course then someone would hit me from behind!)
The truth is, there is no way to get a fair shake. If they want to screw you over, they will.
Recently a driver slammed on his brakes in front of a semi because the truck (allegedly) cut him off. The truck hit the car. The driver of the car was arrested for "reckless endangerment". (chalk one up for fair law enforcement) But I suppose it would still be called "preventable" by the company.
Be safe!

golfhobo 02-23-2008 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChikinTrucka
http://media.timesleader.com/images/...az+Crash+1.jpg
http://www.timesleader.com/news/Mult..._fatality.html


Anyone get caught in this snow squall last week? I wonder who is at fault? Everyone says "It was a sudden squall, out of nowhere, and all of a sudden, I couldn't see." Like all the accidents I hear about in the fog.

Part of the job is knowing when to slow down because of what's anticipated. For example; I take my sunglasses off BEFORE entering a tunnel, I clean my windshield BEFORE turning into the setting sun, I slow down BEFORE entering fog, and I turn on my wipers BEFORE entering sever rainstorm.

The part I don't like is that no matter how careful you are, and well intentioned, there will always be the unforeseen incident.

Be safe!

Well.... at least from the picture, I'd say that the trucker who took the ditch, and is still upright and intact, was NOT at fault!

I don't believe in "all of a sudden!" :roll: NOTHING happens without some kind of warning. Checking the weather forecast makes snow squalls EXPECTED!

KNOWING something about the TIME, location, elevation, surrounding terrain, etc., allows one to EXPECT fog!

It is not enough JUST to "anticipate" weather problems, or others....it is professional to RECOGNIZE the factors I mentioned above and to EXPECT them.

Fog occurrs in valleys surrounded by mountains (or hills) at certain times of the day/night and with certain humidity levels. It is often HIGHLY predictable based on the presence of bodies of water nearby!

Western and northern slopes of mountains or grades are more likely to be COLDER and therefore icy or snowy when the opposite are clear!

Deer and other animals MIGRATE during perrenial times.... and they don't recognize highways!

Winds are usually higher at night due to the lack of the sun's warming of the air which causes it to RISE instead of move laterally.

Drivers are more distracted and frantic during rush hours, including lunchtime.

More traffic leaves and enters the RIGHT lane of traffic than ANY OTHER.

More drivers are on cellphones in the hour just before/during morning and evening rush hours.

The skill, attentiveness, and confidence level of ANY driver.... and especially a truck driver.... can be judged by the frequency of the illumination of his brake lights.

There are a MILLION "clues" out there if we are watching.

I applaud YOUR efforts, ChickinTrucka! The only comment I would make is that a good time to TAKE a BREAK is during the 30 minutes of the setting or rising sun! We need breaks anyways..... why not take them at a time when our ability to see "down the road" is at its lowest point?

But, if you ARE going to be on the road at these times..... I would add THIS:

If the sun is setting OR rising BEHIND you, it is EASY for you/us to see ahead, right? So.... why bother with headlights? Because the traffic coming towards us is looking INTO the sun, and can't see us as well WITHOUT them!

And, in the opposite case.... our headlights won't HELP us much will they? NO..... but they'll help us to see the truck BEHIIND US... and the one ahead of us to see US!!! Almost as bad as the sun in our eyes.... is the sun in our MIRRORS!!

And 4wheelers have the SAME problem!!!

I was driving at dusk a day or two ago, the sun was not even a factor, but the truck behind me was an "oxidized" blue color. I couldn't BELIEVE how well he blended into the grey asphalt of the road behind me! At times, he was nearly "invisible!" I'm SURE he could see ME very well, and had NO IDEA how poorly I could see HIM! Had I been on the phone when he tried to pass me, I may have moved DIRECTLY into his path while passing the car in front of me!

Yes.... Virginia.... MOST accidents ARE preventable!! And many MORE would be if EVERY driver on the road (especially truckers) would recognize THEIR part in doing so!

It is not enough (IMHO) to just tell each other to "be safe." It is imperative that we ALL "pay attention" to those things that will MAKE us "safe!" And we cannot slack off for even ONE moment! The stakes are just TOO high!


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.