Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers

Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/)
-   Rules and Regulations and DAC, Oh My (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/rules-regulations-dac-oh-my-16/)
-   -   Traffic stoppage and logbooks (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/rules-regulations-dac-oh-my/25678-traffic-stoppage-logbooks.html)

golfhobo 03-27-2007 05:18 AM


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
So, where does it say "was known"? :roll:

From 395.2: .......none of which were apparent on the basis of information known to the person dispatching the run at the time it was begun.

Rev.Vassago 03-27-2007 08:10 AM


Originally Posted by golfhobo

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
So, where does it say "was known"? :roll:

From 395.2: .......none of which were apparent on the basis of information known to the person dispatching the run at the time it was begun.

I repeat:

Where does it say "was known"? :roll:

golfhobo 03-27-2007 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago

Originally Posted by golfhobo

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
So, where does it say "was known"? :roll:

From 395.2: .......none of which were apparent on the basis of information known to the person dispatching the run at the time it was begun.

I repeat:

Where does it say "was known"? :roll:

You're RIGHT, Rev! I added the word "was" to differentiate from "should have."

The past tense word KNOWN stands alone as all the verification needed for my interpretation of the regs.

I don't have the time or patience to teach you Englilsh Comprehension. I'm through with this discussion because, as you said, enuff was said last week.

You can take the exception or not, as you please. But, you have said nothing to change my comprehension of the regulations.

I'll leave it to the others to take what they want from this "discussion."

time for me to go OTR again! C'ra!!

Rev.Vassago 03-27-2007 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by golfhobo

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago

Originally Posted by golfhobo

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
So, where does it say "was known"? :roll:

From 395.2: .......none of which were apparent on the basis of information known to the person dispatching the run at the time it was begun.

I repeat:

Where does it say "was known"? :roll:

You're RIGHT, Rev! I added the word "was" to differentiate from "should have."

The past tense word KNOWN stands alone as all the verification needed for my interpretation of the regs.

I don't have the time or patience to teach you Englilsh Comprehension. I'm through with this discussion because, as you said, enuff was said last week.

You can take the exception or not, as you please. But, you have said nothing to change my comprehension of the regulations.

I'll leave it to the others to take what they want from this "discussion."

time for me to go OTR again! C'ra!!

Plain and simple. It doesn't say "was known", but it does say "should have known".


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved