Quote:
BBA University of Michigan majoring in accounting. Work tax season for a CPA firm. Also have several Girl Scout badges :) |
Quote:
|
And she stayed last night at a Holiday Inn Express.
|
Quote:
Seriously though, this is what I am talking about. Dobry4u is obviously well versed in this area, but working for a CPA firm isn't necessarily going to expose you to ALL approaches to filing. Most CPA firms are firmly, strictly adhering to narrow IRS dictates and aren't liable to be in ANY WAY aggressive for their clients. At least not in relatively mundane, everyday-working-stiff affairs like this. They're like H.R. Block: just the plain- vanilla, super safe toe-the-IRS-line deductions, Ma'am. As I've asserted before, there is a definite reason why form 2106 is available for deducting employee expenses separate from (and in addition to) the "itemizing" process. It is also TYPICALLY MISLEADING of the IRS to (seemingly) limit the eligible parties to "reservists, performing artists, etc."....as is their limiting statement in the "Notes" section that I believe Dobry4u refers to. Those who blithely accept their self-serving, narrow "rulings" -- which aren't actual court rulings -- simply genuflect at the altar of our governmental "church." But I choose not to, as does the quoted person above....and there are CPA's THAT AGREE WITH THIS APPROACH. Imagine that! ....Because this particular approach has been shown to be legal and allowable, of course. I suspect these CPA's (that jonp refers to) aren't exactly anarchist skinhead tax protesters, either. They're just doing a good job for their clients. Don't really understand what dle's problem is; I've stated repeatedly now that I'm not a tax expert and am simply trying to help, and he or she continues to parade his or her mocking skepticism. That's fine with me; you may grovel at the feet of the IRS and it won't change my life one iota. But, really: I "survived an encounter with the IRS"? Survived? Wow. Not scared of them much, are you? :lol2: By the way, jonp, thanks for the post basically supporting my approach. This is the kind of feedback that makes this forum worthwhile -- not because you agree, but because it helps open up discussions and ideas, as well as some people's eyes. Unfortunately some folks mis-read such input as balderdash, just because it removes them from a certain way of thinking, or challenges a previous belief. Oh, well, that's why we're in this thread I guess... And I do also appreciate Dobry4u's energetic debate on this; although I probably won't ever use her services. No doubt she'd throw me out of her office anyway. Can the Rev explain the nuances of how the tax-free per diem pay -- IF paid by a trucking employer to an OTR driver -- affects a tax filer like myself, who normally lacks enough deductions to itemize? I'd appreciate any insights you have. Thanks in advance. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not a problem. The reason that I never itemize is pretty simple. Unless your eating 3 meals a day in a steakhouse and staying at the Ramada overnight you are never going to rack up an amount over your standard deduction. I can't imagine eating up over $50/day. At least I never have and why bother saving all of those receipts? I do save the receipts for items that are job related such as tools I keep in the truck, clothing with the company logo on it, etc.. I never get fancy so fly under the radar. If the IRS wants to waste time on me in an audit I have nothing to fear. The more deductions that you claim, the higher the likelyhood you will meet the IRS up close and in person.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've never found that it makes that much difference in my pay one way or the other because I don't take a great deal of deductions anyways. My taxes are pretty straight- forward. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.