Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers

Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/)
-   Anything and Everything (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/anything-everything-106/)
-   -   Double L's 20 Questions (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/anything-everything/34759-double-ls-20-questions.html)

Rev.Vassago 07-29-2008 06:12 AM


Originally Posted by golfhobo
Rev once again ignores the first part of a statement for the purpose of emphasizing the last part:


golfhobo wrote:
I think YOU are the only one who misunderstood both my post AND my explanation and motives.

Since nobody else weighed in on the subject, the only way I can see that you could come to this conclusion is the belief that you are psychic.
Thanks for proving my point. I said you didn't understand clausal relationships in English composition, and you just proved it.

I find it hilarious that you claim that I can't comprehend English, when you clearly cannot do it yourself.

You came to a conclusion. You "thought" that I was the only one who misunderstood. Since nobody else weighed in on the subject and there was no evidence to support the "thought", the only logical conclusion to bring you to that "thought" must be because you believe you are psychic.

Does that make more sense to you, or do I need to draw a picture to get you to understand it?


If you include the first part of my statement....


Only time will tell, but as of now...
you would not be so BLIND as to only see what you want to see.

So you chose to come to a conclusion prior to the facts being presented? Again, you must think you are psychic.


But, you have proved several times that that is the way you "see" things.
I see what is in front of me. I don't see "spirits" of anything.


Perhaps, I DID give everyone else too much credit. I'm sure a few of your groupies will see it your way.
I have no groupies, but if I did, I'm sure they would be thankful that you used your psychic powers to predict how they will see things.


But "thinking" others will understand my words is not the same as "claiming" that they do.
So your thoughts aren't necessarily correct? This is getting very interesting!


Rev also says...


I don't need to quote you using the word.
Of course not, if you insist on making the rules.
No, I just choose to not follow your rules:

Originally Posted by golfhobo
Please find one quote where I CLAIM any such thing. Don't include anything you THINK implies psychic powers. YOU used the word psychic. Either quote ME using it, or drop it.

It would appear that you are trying to set the rules, and then whining when I won't follow them.



But then, how can you ask...


What theory would that be? I wasn't aware that I presented a theory on capitalism or market competition.


Do I call it Socialism? Where?

Did I insist that you present a quote of where I stated that specific thing? Nope. I asked for some clarification, since I don't recall ever presenting any theories on capitalism, market competition, or Socialism.

Rev.Vassago 07-29-2008 06:30 AM

BTW, I find it very funny that all I had to do is mention your name in one little line:


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Golfhobo's post shows exactly what is wrong with politics today - it has become a game of "yeah, my guy isn't qualified, but let's look at how bad the guy on your side is!"

And suddenly you are ranting and raving about English comprehension. :lol:

golfhobo 07-29-2008 06:47 AM


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
BTW, I find it very funny that all I had to do is mention your name in one little line:


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Golfhobo's post shows exactly what is wrong with politics today - it has become a game of "yeah, my guy isn't qualified, but let's look at how bad the guy on your side is!"

And suddenly you are ranting and raving about English comprehension. :lol:

Well, if you had misinterpreted someone ELSE'S post and used it to substantiate your opinion of what is wrong with politics today, I would have let THEM clarify their own post. It would not be impossible for you to make a statement of opinion on the subject without referencing ANY other post as the basis for your opinion.

It ALSO would have been possible for you to just accept my clarification without trying to tell ME what I meant, or to justify your lack of interpretation, or to just throw out another insult.

No..... I take that back. It would NOT be possible for you to do that.

Go ahead, Rev...... YOU can have the last word. I'm done here.

Rev.Vassago 07-29-2008 07:07 AM


Originally Posted by golfhobo
Go ahead, Rev...... YOU can have the last word. I'm done here.


Double L 07-29-2008 07:10 AM

Y'all done fighting now? It seems like we can't even talk about politics without a fight going on. Anyway keep the questions coming though seriously!

Rev.Vassago 07-29-2008 07:47 AM


Originally Posted by Double L
Y'all done fighting now? It seems like we can't even talk about politics without a fight going on. Anyway keep the questions coming though seriously!

Consider that a crash course in politics. :wink:

Double L 07-29-2008 07:54 AM


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago

Originally Posted by Double L
Y'all done fighting now? It seems like we can't even talk about politics without a fight going on. Anyway keep the questions coming though seriously!

Consider that a crash course in politics. :wink:

Trust me I rather hear debates/arguments from a bunch of truck drivers over them so called "experts" on the news networks anyday.

Colts Fan 07-29-2008 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by golfhobo
Thanks to people like Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh.... MANY if not most Conservatives espouse their hatred for ALL Liberals. The recent church shooting is a manifestation of this "class" hatred. When was the last time we heard of a Liberal shooting down a bunch of conservatives in church?

Conservatives don't hate liberals. Conservatives hate liberalism. It's funny when liberals bash conservative policies and conservatives themselves. We have had European stlye liberal policies in effect since FDR. Conservative policies in pure form have not had a chance to work.

Your last statement is ridiculous. Ever heard of the Weather Underground? Bill Ayers? Charles Manson? I'm sure there are plenty of other classic liberal nuts from the 60's and 70's I could name.

Rev.Vassago 07-29-2008 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by Colts Fan
Your last statement is ridiculous.

Only his last one? :lol:



(that was too good of a setup.)

Colts Fan 07-29-2008 10:55 AM


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago

Originally Posted by Colts Fan
Your last statement is ridiculous.

Only his last one? :lol:



(that was too good of a setup.)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved