I think Obmam uses the race card, just like others have done in the past. He uses it to his advantage, when necessary. And him saying that attacks on his wife are off limits. Oh,please!!! Then get out of politics. :roll:

That's a great thing for a "future first lady" to say. And if she becomes the first lady, all of a sudden she'll start saying how great this country is. Our country's leaders are suppose to set examples for us and for those around the world. What are these two saying about our country?

Which guns do you need? AK47? Mac-10? M-16?

Are you one of those folks, who will insist that those are "sportsmen's" guns? If so..... :roll: :roll: :roll:

If you are a hunter...then why would you feel the need to own a gun meant for only one thing...mass murder?

I am a hunter...a .270, a 30.06, a .7mm, a .303, or even a 22-250 work great for long shot's. I like a 357 with a 9" barrel, as a pistol...Ruger Blackhawk. Am I concerned that any or all of those guns will be "otlawed"?? No.

As for the rest..give em back to the military....which was what their original intent was.

And if your argument is that you need one of those "Killer" guns for self-protection....I would ask...Why?


I believe in the individual's right to keep and bear arms.....but I don't believe that any individual needs to keep an arsenal that includes fully automatic weapons that are designed specificly for killing "Human" prey.

If you want to proclaim yourself a "collector"...then...collect guns worth collecting...say...a Sharps .50 caliber...1872 model...or a Colt .45 caliber..1860 model. I have a best friend...whom has the rifles and pistols that his great-great-great grandparents carried, when they migrated from New England to Montana....in 1823. Shotting an original "black powder" gun is an incredible experience. Far better than a "reproduction" model...and by the way....the "original" black powder weapons, are what the Constitution allows you to "keep & bear".
I seriously doubt that the fine men, whom wrote that important document, ever dreamed that one day there would be guns that a man could hold in his hand...and use to kill 100 people in seconds, instead of in days. I'm just not buying that argument.

As for having weapons on hand, to beat down a rebellion by our military....give me a break...not gonna happen.

On the orginal posted question....Obama would be a better choice (in my opinion) than McClain..and Hillary would be a better choice than Obama (again..in my opinion).

Is the country, as a whole prepared to elect and support a "black" president? If it isn't now......then it won't ever be.

Is Obama ready to run this country? I seriously do not know. Given the comments I hear from so many "African-Americans" and what they expect him to do for them...I would say no.

With a statement like that "Given the comments I hear from so many "African Americans" and what they expect him to do for them" I doubt that you really even know and black americans!

All the blacks that I know, want the same thing most other Americans want (As a Nation for us to go in a different direction)!

Let's try something new and refreshing! We have had eight years of old grumpy men running the country, I sure hope we do have four more!

Let's give some new refreshing/young ideals a try!!

New and Refreshing...Like what???

The United States doesnt need "new and refreshing". It needs a good slap in the face for steering away from its core values. Oh...what are those core values...that would be the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which our Government has so successfully steered us away from, We need a Government (or less of) that will steer the United States back in that direction. That is the only change we need.

Obama's proposed "changes" have been tried and proven ineffective and dangerous to this nation in the past. I won't vote for him simply because I think he is wrong on the issues and a danger to the security of this nations. There are several black men/women whom I respect and if they ran I would vote for them. Obama is not one of them.

Oh and as for being in Iraq for 5-10 more years. We probably will be but then it will be settled and done. If we leave now we will be back in 5-10 years starting all over again. We HAVE to stay and finish the job correctly. we are so close. So very close. To pull out now would undo it all.

If Michael Steele or JC Watts were running for President, they would get my vote. Hussein Obama is by far the most left wing, radical, ambition minded, dangerous candidate we have ever had run for President. You think fuel prices are high now? Just wait and see what happens when he taxes the "windfall profits" of the oil companies.

McCain is spineless, not conservative at all and buys into the global warming hoax.

I wouldn't call McCain spineless but I don't think he is as right wing conservative as some would like. More middle of the road than most politicians. Like most people in this Nation are. I think we need someone who is less left or right and more middle.

Global warming is a bunch of crap though. Heck when I was in school they warned us about the coming ice age. :roll: ( No age jokes thank you very much :wink: )

Middle = spineless. This global warming farce that is being propagandized by the media and the marxist environmental lobby is the greatest single threat to our economy. McCain drank the kool-aid.

And I especially don't like the way McCain is more willing to buddy up with his leftist pals than his conservative base.

I don't trust BIPOLAR people and I especially don't trust BIPARTISAN people!

NO!!!

And, since when is economy Bush's strong point? Who's kidding who? There are locations in Indianapolis that I used to deliver to five and six years ago. At the time, they were going GANGBUSTERS and expanding in order to handle the volume of business they had. Now, in the same areas, I'm seeing "REAL-ESTATE AUCTION" signs, and guess what's going up to the highest bidder? Those same locations that are now empty. They've gone out of business.

I've also seen something else I've only seen in pictures before. Look at some of the old pictures of the GREAT DEPRESSION, with cars, pickups, and pulling trailers with all their belongings loaded up. That's what I've seen on occasion over the last few months, only the vehicles were much newer. No, I have not seen the volume of it that I read about during the GREAT DEPRESSION, but is that previews of coming attractions? Is it going to get worse before it gets better?

We're seeing trucking companies shutting down. In the past, companies were being sold out. Now, no one is buying them. They are simply going out of business. And, look at the used truck lots. I've gone by new housing developements that have BILLBOARDS saying: "60% OFF ON OVER-STOCK HOUSING. The developers are trying to "dump" them just to get out from under the property tax because they aren't selling. What should have been a GOLD-MINE has become an expensive liability. A few months ago, a customer I delivered to, gave me a clue to look for. If a home is going up for forclosure, the grass should be cut and has not been. As you go around the country, look at the front yards you pass and see how many haven't been mowed in a while, and in what areas you see them.

And, when Clinton and Obama were both campaigning, they BOTH were talking about RAISING TAXES on an already OVER-BURDENED society. McCaan was the only one I heard that did not say he was going to raise taxes. Although I have often wondered how he planned to take care of the deficit Bush is going to leave behind. The fact that Obama is new and has virtually no record suggests that he's a "DARK HORSE". We really don't know what he will do.

While Ron Paul does have some support, I really don't think he has enough to get the Republican Nomination that he wants. But, something to keep in mind... "NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS". There are a lot of people that are elligable to vote, and do not. That is "NO NEWS". Things have gone far enough and have gotten bad enough that we NEED to send them a "NO CONFIDENCE VOTE". We need many more people to go to the polls and vote for a "complete unknown". Then, when the news media catches up with that person, he/she gets a national voice to talk about issues that NONE of the current candidates are addressing. A voice to talk about ambiguous numbers that make it convenient for anyone in government to say we're doing well when we are not. That person does NOT have to win the election in order to succeed.

A letter writing campaign can be ignored. Letters, and U S MAIL are private. Unless the official chooses to make them public, no one knows how many people wrote letters, and which side they were on. But votes are a public matter, and can not be swept under any rug. At this point, that is the only way I see any kind of real change coming.

I think it was last year I found out that Bush is a "RECOVERING ALCOHOLIC". Well, Winston Churchill drank a fifth of scotch every night. So, I don't really know if that's a strike against Bush or if it has anything to do with which way the country is going, but it does make me wonder. A bit odd that during one president's administration, we first open up the Mexican Boarder, then decide to build a wall to keep them out.

Has anyone seen the list of benefits that foreign nationals get when they come here? Our government needs to make a commitment to AMERICANS first. Our tax dollars need to go toward helping AMERICANS BEFORE they go to foreign nationals. In America, AMERICANS need to get a PRIORITY. How about setting up AMERICANS with gas stations and motels? And, why can't I understand the person on the other end of the line when I call about my credit card?????

And then, it really gets laughable. There was a bill before congress, last week I think, that had support from both sides of the floor. It did not pass... Because the Democrats and Republicans began arguing about just who was more sympathetic to the public about gasoline prices.

"Oh, gee whiz, we're so very sorry about the price of oil, now would you turn around, bend over, and spread 'em?"

I agree. McCain has a long time constituency that includes both sides. This is something that becomes very important to the President, since he can't accomplish anything if he has no support in the legislature.

Obama hasn't had time to build any kind of support group in the Senate because he hasn't spent any time there. He can talk all he wants about making changes, but his hands will be tied if the legislature isn't behind him.

I think too many people mistakenly believe that one person in one office can change everything. NOT TRUE!

I still want to know who is behind Obama's candidacy. I've lived in Chicago all my life and NO ONE ever heard of him until he ran for the Senate 2 years ago. He wasn't involved in politics at all. He was/is an attorney with some questionable clients. And the people he has been associated with, like Rev. Wright, are even more questionable. Add to that the fact that he now wants to distance himself from the hate spewing Rev. and claims to not have known the Rev.s views, is a bald faced lie. A political ass-covering. You don't attend the mans church for 20 years and NOT know what he stands for.

Sorry I don't trust him and believe he will be a puppet for whatever machine is behind this.