![]() |
Re: The Will of the People, Yada, Yada
Quote:
|
Re: The Will of the People, Yada, Yada
Quote:
Get YOUR facts straight. |
Quote:
|
Re: The Will of the People, Yada, Yada
Quote:
|
Re: The Will of the People, Yada, Yada
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There inlies the problem with "random sampling". |
Re: The Will of the People, Yada, Yada
Quote:
|
Re: The Will of the People, Yada, Yada
Quote:
I think it would have passed, no matter who was president, we were destined to have it shoved down our throats. certainly, the buffoon who is president now would have signed it since it was his daddys idea and he loves illegals.. |
READ HIS POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Even on THIS BOARD full of truck drivers, maybe 50%............ :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Just the automatic reply from the Company Men. :roll: |
OK!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which poll is NOT random sampling? DUH!!!!!!!!! :? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A new poll released by the groups today and conducted by the nonpartisan Lake Research Partners found that a majority of Americans (56 percent) believe the Bush administration's plan to allow Mexico-domiciled trucks to travel outside the current commercial zone and throughout the United States is dangerous. Majority agreement that this is dangerous for U.S. drivers transcends gender, age, political identification and region. Notably, self-identified independents (60 percent) are most likely to agree that the Bush proposal is dangerous, though majorities of Democrats (54 percent) and Republicans (58 percent) concur. |
Hmmmmmm... :roll: Where do you find this objective polling group?
Can you actually be objective? I'm really not trying to pick a fight here, but isn't objective ignorant? How can you be objective of something that has an impact on you? Convince me, I have an open mind! ! |
BTW, last I've checked, 56% was a majority. :lol:
|
Quote:
But just wait, there will be a massive accident that kills someone in the US by one of these guys. And all hell will break loose and those same people who kept their heads in the sand will be screaming for congressional hearings and filing lawsuits. |
Quote:
From another forum: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Has any body thought about this, all these drivers coming north are gonna have to be english speakers because we do not use the International road signs which are symbol based and used all over the world except the US and Australia(I think). A majority of our signs are written like MERGE LEFT, SHOULDER CLOSED,and .....so on. Also Mexico uses metrics and not our foot and lbs unless I am mistaken. Drove for 20 years in Europe and lots of American tourists have gotten theirselves into serious trouble because of their ignorance of the international road signs. My German wife really had to watch it when she got here because she was still learning English and some of our signs can be pretty confusing for someone who doesnt speak the language.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i dont think the canadians will haul as cheap as the mexicans.
i know alot of our big limber mills are are scrapped and removed because they cannot compete with the canadian government. for some reason the "world court" believes canada is entitled to half our lumber market. the canadian born drivers are excellant and have good equipment and an effective dot who is profitting from nafta? mex trucking is not in the same league as the us and canada |
Quote:
|
i see the rcruiters for the greedy trucking companies are all for the labor day slap in the face and dont appreciate the efforts the teamsters have made for the otr drivers.
just use these mega carriers for experience and get a good job |
ive seen them on the border ramming that trailer in the hole repeatedly to make it fit and replaced the missing lights and tires. its just wonderful
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Look up pyramid schemes and how they work and then get back with me on this. The few at the top make deals using the "chaff" at the bottom of the boards. They cut their brother's throats until there are no more throats to be cut. |
i hope that ata throws you bone sometime. they wont need you soon. i wont work for a big company that wants to exploit these mexican truckers and i hope they get what they pay for.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The point I was trying to make was he "caught" me speeding with no radar gun and pulled out of a side street right behind me. When I asked to see his non-existant radar, he said "gringos who want to see the radar go to jail." I was then told that I would "have to pay cash to leave." I offered $20 and he said more. I offered $40 and he took it and left. There was nothing on the up and up about what this crooked cop was doing. I've heard many other first hand stories about cops extorting Americans in Mexico. So, no their HOS or whatever it's called is a joke and we all know the crooked cops will be paid to look the other way. But we'll all be happy when JB Hunt, Schneider and Celadon haul goods across from Mexico with Mexican drivers for .10 cpm. Those are just the few I can think of that have Mexican subsidiaries. Now in all reality, freight can come from Mexico to Canada and never be driven by an American. The Mexican will take it to the Canadian border and relay it to a Canadian. 1500 miles through America with no American driver ever touching it. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
So If im to understand all of this right. You people dont want mexican drivers over here because they MIGHT be on drugs, run over hours and drive unsafe trucks. I can see your argument. They might take some of the work away from our americans who MIGHT be on drugs, run over hours and drive unsafe trucks.
|
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: Bush has what....18 month's..to complete the North American Union.
I firmly believe if Mexico and Canada are both folded into the United States, we will be better off. That way...any driver who wanted to could go to the Nrthern Provinces and drive on the Ice Roads. We would not have an "Illegal Alien" problem with Mexicans, because they would automatically become citizens. No need for Border Patrol in the north, so all those agent could be transfered to the south. Now...that border has been greatly reduced as regards distance, so with the transfer of Border Patrol Agent's from all 3 "former" nations, to the southern border..we have a decent chance of reducing the "Illegal Alien" problem to say...5 an hour, from the hundred's that cross per hour now. Drugs? Might as well just make them all legal. That way, taxes will be paid by the user's. If the "Poor" can not pay taxes, then we just throw them in a prison. Mexico has plenty of open spaces, so remodeling their prison system, to accomodate the "Poor" won't be a problem. Now..Canada & Mexico are "Non-death Penalty" regions...so..does the "Old" US of A put an end to using the "Death Penalty"..or do Canada and Mexico, become supporter's?? Our Congress people will have plenty of teachers (from "Old" Mexico), whom will be able to assist them in learning how to better accept larger bribes. Of course...will Canadian law makers be able to make the transition to "Bribery" Now...we lower class truckdriver's and store clerk's, as "peon's", are going to have to learn to live a more frugal life-style. Of course we will have the lower class from "Old" Mexico to assist us in the learning proccess. Do you think that the Corporate leaders will be willing to reduce the cost of living, to give us all a "fair" chance to live a decent life? After all...someone is gonna have to do the commoner jobs..like haul the product from the port's, plants & factories, to the store shelves, so the "Superior" class can maintain their current lifestyle!!!! Hey...it worked for the Soviets didn't it?? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: |
Quote:
|
Folks, repeat after me, there is no "North American Union" in the works that means that the US, Canada and Mexico will become operating as one country under one government.
I love to listen to conspiracy theories for a while, but this is a perfect example of one that has gone entirely too far. Plain and simple, and it is nothing more than that. I love how Bush gets the blame for all of this when he is simply following the actions agreed to in the terms of NAFTA. Everyone cries, "well the will of the American people was spoken in HR 1773 and Bush ignored it...". How do you expect W to act on something that has never even reached his desk? There is a process involved in which that resolution would have to go through the Senate before it would ever even reach the Oval Office. Why is it not a huge conspiracy by the Senate to squash the will of the American public since Bush has never been given the opportunity to even act on this resolution? Does anyone have the slightest clue as to how many resolutions are passed by the House and then die on the Senate floor before they even come before the President? IMO, this is nothing more than a bunch of people getting all worked up over nothing. They choose to get their education from America's Truckin Network, the Teamsters and OOIDA (which is short for "Teamsters for Owner Operator's). The jobs of these people are to get you worked up, it improves their ratings and increases their membership which makes more money for them. NAFTA was first broached by Jimmy Carter, tossed around a little by Reagan (who at the time had bigger fish to fry), was worked out by Bush SR (thanks to the work of Reagan, he had more time on his hands). Clinton claimed to hate it and campaigned that he would kill the deal while he was running for the office. Then in the first year of his presidency he complimented on it that it was great for America, signed it into law without removing anything that SR had agreed to and continued to be a bigger proponent of the Agreement than any President before him. It was the first (and IMO, only) significant result from his Presidency. Bush comes along and the rent is due, he has to take action to follow the terms of the agreement so he does. Nothing more, nothing less. My guess is that Al Gore or John Kerry would have done the same thing. I'm a huge supporter of Bush, I wished he could serve 8 more years. I don't agree with everything he's done, but I do with most. His policies have been great for the economy during a time when we certainly had multiple opportunities to falter. I'm better off than I was 10 years ago, everyone I know is better off. The economy is thriving, unemployment is at an all time low (yet the Help Wanted section is 20 pages long) and the median income continues to rise. So spare me the crap about how all the new jobs are minimum wage. The GDP and the markets are flourishing. All in all, it's a great time to be an American! I'm also a huge supporter of Fred Thompson. What amazes me is that people can support him and bash Bush to no end. When you study the issues and where each of them stands, it's almost like looking at twins. They are both men of conviction and faith, who will stand their ground and do what is in the best interest of the country, regardless of the opinion of the largely uneducated public. We can have a great politician, who talks out of both sides of their mouth and accomplishes nothing like we had in the 8 years preceding Bush or we can have one who takes a stand, makes a decision and sticks to their guns. It's pretty much impossible to get both. I'll leave the same standing bet I've offered before. Let the Mexican trucks roll in and in 10 years if there is still not hundreds of companies where I can go and make far more than 15 cpm, I'll buy you a steak dinner... |
Scary mexican truck picture
http://www.tmm.com.mx/esp/english/se...es/Trailer.jpg Actaully, looking at TMM, mexicos largest transportation company. It looks like a very well run company. Nice trucks, very profitable and pays their employees pretty well by mexican standards. Their containers have been going trough our country for years and you always see their trucks down in south texas. They dont seem to be causing any problems. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved