|
What I am trying to say is Bush and his DOJ could declare any US citizen right now an ENEMY combatant and their is NOTHING any of our FAMILIES or all of our LAWYERS could do since he took the right of HEBAS CORPUS away from us. We would be given an all expense paid trip down to GITMO and thrown in with the rest of the terriosts that have been caught subjected to whatever treatment is being given out at this time. Since we are by the way not following the Geneva Convention for the treatment of prisoners subject to torture and beatings and who knows what else thanks George W Bush for removing us from that one if we do end up in a war with Iran they will make sure to treat our Soilders with respect.
|
Originally Posted by ironeagle2006
Yoopr I do not want ot get a mod mad at me but remember this about Bush he has taken away Hebas Corpus the foundamental right of ALL good Legal systems. All someone in the DOJ has to do is declare anyone an Ememy Combatant and off you go with NO WAY TO FIGHT THE ChARGES IF ANY brought against you. You can not even have a lawyer file a Hebas Corpus which means where is the body in latin in court since he Decided that does not apply to Combatants at all. He was told by the leaders of his own party in Congress do not do anything with Libbys sentance at all yet him being the Decider did what he did. Yes I can not stand the man for the simple reason he lost his focus and went after the wrong man that being Hussian which was contained instead of keeping after Bin Laden and finshing his butt off.
When is the last time you've heard from bin Laden? He's dead-mission accomplished. Since we are by the way not following the Geneva Convention for the treatment of prisoners subject to torture and beatings and who knows what else Now you're just plain Wrong-Give me your PERSONAL Knowledge of this other than something you've read or heard from Main Stream Media. For terrorists captured they're treated well. As far as I'm concerned they should be hung by their Nads. |
Originally Posted by ironeagle2006
What I am trying to say is Bush and his DOJ could declare any US citizen right now an ENEMY combatant and their is NOTHING any of our FAMILIES or all of our LAWYERS could do since he took the right of HEBAS CORPUS away from us. We would be given an all expense paid trip down to GITMO and thrown in with the rest of the terriosts that have been caught subjected to whatever treatment is being given out at this time. Since we are by the way not following the Geneva Convention for the treatment of prisoners subject to torture and beatings and who knows what else thanks George W Bush for removing us from that one if we do end up in a war with Iran they will make sure to treat our Soilders with respect.
|
Thje Miltary commisons bill of 2005 removed the right of Hebas Corpus to all people deemed Enemy Combantants by either a Miltary Lawary or Goverment Offical. Also Bush in a speech in 2005 stated since that terroists have no recoinized country the Geneva Conevtion does not APPLY to how they will be treated when they are in our custody. That means you could be an Iranian Iraqi National but deemed a terrorist and have no protection under the Geneva COnvention.
|
Originally Posted by ironeagle2006
Thje Miltary commisons bill of 2005 removed the right of Hebas Corpus to all people deemed Enemy Combantants by either a Miltary Lawary or Goverment Offical. Also Bush in a speech in 2005 stated since that terroists have no recoinized country the Geneva Conevtion does not APPLY to how they will be treated when they are in our custody. That means you could be an Iranian Iraqi National but deemed a terrorist and have no protection under the Geneva COnvention.
|
Giving same rights as we have to Terrorists????
Are you for REAL??????????? Screw em. They're treated well and thanks to the Libs they're treated TOO well. Try em and hang the bastards |
Lets see. Slick Willy pardoned so many criminals when he left office it took 500 pages of printed paper to list them all. Many of them were absolute scum and you are upset that Bush pardoned one man who had never been in trouble with the law prior to this? Willy lied in front of a grand jury and nothing happened to him!!!!!!!!
Its amazing how selective memory works, isn't it? Once again you have proven the point that liberals defined the word hypocrite. |
Originally Posted by Karnajj
Willy lied in front of a grand jury and nothing happened to him!!!!!!!!
Its amazing how selective memory works, isn't it?Once again you have proven the point that liberals defined the word hippocrite. |
Originally Posted by golfhobo
Well, you can't say Dubya doens't pay his bills to his master Dick Cheney.
Libby has been "commuted" BEFORE he spent a DAY in jail, and HIS crime was obstruction of justice in a trial concerning National Intelligence! If you can't see the difference in THAT, then you are drinking too much Koolaid, and dare I say, are bordering on plain "ignorant and stubborn" stupidity! President Clinton's eleventh-hour pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich has sparked a firestorm of controversy, launching investigations in both houses of Congress and igniting fierce protest from both Democrats and Republicans. The U.S. House and Senate have issued a rash of subpoenas calling for witnesses as well as financial records, as the House Government Reform Committee continued its hearings and the Senate Judiciary Committee geared up for its own proceedings. Thursday, the controversy took another step forward — no, we're not at impeachment yet, but it's been suggested — when federal prosecutors in New York officially opened a criminal investigation into whether Rich did indeed buy his pardon with his ex-wife Denise's pointed largesse to the First Couple and the Democratic party. In 1983, Rich was indicted in federal court of evading more than $48 million in taxes. He was also charged with 51 counts of tax fraud and with running illegal oil deals with Iran during the hostage crisis. Marc Rich's socialite ex-wife has donated an estimated $1 million to Democratic causes, including $70,000 to Hillary Clinton's successful Senate campaign and $450,000 to the Clinton presidential library fund. She also lobbied heavily for Marc's pardon. Investigators want to know if Denise's contributions led to a direct quid pro quo exchange for her ex-husband's pardon. Clinton has denied any connection, saying he relied solely on the information provided by Jack Quinn (former White House counsel and Rich's current lawyer) when he was weighing the pardon request. |
Originally Posted by golfhobo
But, as someone said, there are hundreds of people serving jail terms today for the same offenses of lying to the FBI and obstructing justice. Most of their terms are no more or less than what Scooter got!
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved