|
Originally Posted by MACK
We win like we did in World War2 by taking 300 planes at once each one haulling 20,000lbs of bombs and and droping them on cities untill they aren't anything more than a cloud of dust that is how we win the war.
Now you want to annihilate the people entirely? |
Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by MACK
We win like we did in World War2 by taking 300 planes at once each one haulling 20,000lbs of bombs and and droping them on cities untill they aren't anything more than a cloud of dust that is how we win the war.
Now you want to annihilate the people entirely? |
Originally Posted by MACK
Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by MACK
We win like we did in World War2 by taking 300 planes at once each one haulling 20,000lbs of bombs and and droping them on cities untill they aren't anything more than a cloud of dust that is how we win the war.
Now you want to annihilate the people entirely? If we kill everyone in the cities, then the enemy will be gone and we will have won? What did you think of the recent Israeli strikes in Lebanon, then? |
Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by MACK
Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by MACK
We win like we did in World War2 by taking 300 planes at once each one haulling 20,000lbs of bombs and and droping them on cities untill they aren't anything more than a cloud of dust that is how we win the war.
Now you want to annihilate the people entirely? If we kill everyone in the cities, then the enemy will be gone and we will have won? What did you think of the recent Israeli strikes in Lebanon, then? As far as Israel I wish they would have just kept pounding the crap out of Lebanon. |
Originally Posted by MACK
No the enemy is not the whole city but the enemy is in every city and you cannot and will not win this war until you are willing to use force. Such as going into each and every city and going into every building and dragging everybody out into the street and shooting anybody who you even suspect to be the enemy and just leave them lying in the street that is what those people understand and you will not have anymore problems or like what I said with the bombers if there is a section of the city that is not acting right turn it into dust and people will learn to stay away from those kind of people.
As far as Israel I wish they would have just kept pounding the crap out of Lebanon. I'm pretty sure that most of the people in the Middle East see/believe Americans to all have your thoughts. I know what Cheney got out of the war, his stock in Halliburton went up over a thousand percent. What are you getting out of it? |
Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by MACK
No the enemy is not the whole city but the enemy is in every city and you cannot and will not win this war until you are willing to use force. Such as going into each and every city and going into every building and dragging everybody out into the street and shooting anybody who you even suspect to be the enemy and just leave them lying in the street that is what those people understand and you will not have anymore problems or like what I said with the bombers if there is a section of the city that is not acting right turn it into dust and people will learn to stay away from those kind of people.
As far as Israel I wish they would have just kept pounding the crap out of Lebanon. I'm pretty sure that most of the people in the Middle East see/believe Americans to all have your thoughts. I know what Cheney got out of the war, his stock in Halliburton went up over a thousand percent. What are you getting out of it? You and all you cut and run democraps are keeping us from wining this war. |
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/13/iraq.graves/
Human rights groups list the dead from Saddam's regime at something more like 300,000. And these people in the mass graves were not caught up in a war where they have FOREIGN insurgents hiding and fighting amongst them in their communities and use them as shields. They were removed and gassed and or just machine gunned and pushed into pits by bulldozers. I wonder why there are so many people who rationalize the latest versions of the warsaw ghettos as none of the worlds business. How brave of you. I guess we were in the wrong when we attacked France, Belgium, Holland and then finally Germany in 1944-45. Was it worth the thousands of civilian casualties that these countries suffered to rid the world of a force that had killed millions. |
Consider THIS....
what are you even doing here but deliberately trying to push someone's buttons. Are you even interested in any ones opinion...or what? Must everyone simply agree with you?? |
Originally Posted by Fozzy
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/13/iraq.graves/
Human rights groups list the dead from Saddam's regime at something more like 300,000. And these people in the mass graves were not caught up in a war where they have FOREIGN insurgents hiding and fighting amongst them in their communities and use them as shields. They were removed and gassed and or just machine gunned and pushed into pits by bulldozers. I wonder why there are so many people who rationalize the latest versions of the warsaw ghettos as none of the worlds business. How brave of you. I guess we were in the wrong when we attacked France, Belgium, Holland and then finally Germany in 1944-45. Was it worth the thousands of civilian casualties that these countries suffered to rid the world of a force that had killed millions. At first I read your post to be about Falluja where it is estimated that we killed 300,000. http://discussions.pbs.org/viewtopic...w=flat&start=0 read the post, "Killing people is like squashing an ant:" on the second page. Then, there is a post in this thread: http://discussions.pbs.org/viewtopic...ghlight=barnes "Choosing Civilization" by Juliania. So, with these things in mind I thought you really were saying that I was brave to post a dissenting opinion. I don't know if you caught the news yesterday, but Saddam was saying that the reason the Kurds got gassed was that he was fighting Iran and they just happened to die when he attacked Iran. Sound familiar? So should they let Saddam off when he was just doing what Bush does? |
Originally Posted by roadhog
Consider THIS....
what are you even doing here but deliberately trying to push someone's buttons. Are you even interested in any ones opinion...or what? Must everyone simply agree with you?? Nor did anyone write in agreement. Do you think that there should only be agreement with your opinion? I had asked you what you are getting out of the war. I wonder... what are you getting out of the war that makes you so keen on it? As I said, I know what Cheney is getting: major increase in value in his Hallaburton stock. (oops, I've forgotten how to spell Halliburton.) Oh, sorry.... I missed your post in caps and red ink. Let me ask you this, don't you think that if the country's young men are being sent to fight possibly to their death, that you and I should be getting something out of the war? I do. A war purely for the profit of a few people is morally unacceptable to me. Isn't it to you? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved