Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers

Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/)
-   Rules and Regulations and DAC, Oh My (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/rules-regulations-dac-oh-my-16/)
-   -   Rocky Mtn Doubles (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/rules-regulations-dac-oh-my/26109-rocky-mtn-doubles.html)

Ian Williams 04-04-2007 05:45 AM

Rocky Mtn Doubles
 
Assuming the pup is heavier than the van, can you legally pull a 53' behind a 28 trailer in Nevada?

Management wants me to do this on occasion here in Reno. I've gotten conflicting info on the legality of this setup.

Ian

ben45750 04-06-2007 12:21 PM

Hey Ian, I searched all over and I can't find anything that says you can't pull a 53' behind a pup. I also didn't find anything that says you can though either. I would think even though the pup is heavier it would be safer to pull it behind the 53'. The reason why I think that is because the 53' trailer has tandem axles where the pup has single axles, I would think the tandems on the 53' would give the pup more stability even though it's heavier. I might be wrong because I have never pulled a RM combination but just seems like the 53' behind the pup would whip more than the pup behind the 53' trailer?

Uturn2001 04-06-2007 01:08 PM

Lets also consider turning radius. If you have the short trailer in the front, there is no way the longer trailer is going to be able to train around corners.

kjax 04-06-2007 01:32 PM

I've seen short straight trucks pulling 45-48's, but no tractor trailer combos reversed like that. I wouldn't want to pull it like that, regardless of what the law says. Not loaded, not empty. YMMV

marylandkw 04-06-2007 01:50 PM

When I was out west I sure never saw one pulled like that. And I am pretty sure it would stand out if I did see one. I would not do it myself for the same reason Uturn would not, tracking around corners would be a nightmare.

Ben, My memory is rusty now(8 years since I pulled a RMD) but IIRC the pup has to be a tandem with a tandem dolly as well to meet the bridge law.

ben45750 04-06-2007 02:12 PM

I just figured since Ian worked for Conway they would be single axles.

marylandkw 04-06-2007 02:16 PM

You know I almost didn't say anything but once again my foot tastes funny :lol:

Ian Williams 04-06-2007 07:05 PM


Originally Posted by ben45750
I just figured since Ian worked for Conway they would be single axles.

Thanks for the feedback guys..I guess I'll just have to get off my duff and read the Nevada vehicle code and/or check with a DOT officer here.

We only use our reverse rockies for P&D; in this case we are pullling out of a customer where a fully "loaded" trailer may have 6-10k in it, so weight is not much of an issue.

We mostly have single screw sterlings, but for the past two years locations in Western that see a lot of snow like Reno, Boise, etc have been getting twin screw line units. We also have a handful of Old Freightliners and brand spankin' new Volvos (8k on the odo) that are used for team runs.

This pic is of our power line on a Sat last summer:
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m...7-30-06_01.jpg

Ian

allan5oh 04-07-2007 10:06 AM

I see em here, and I see turnpikes a lot too. Ab, Sk, Mb, and ND run a lot of turnpikes.

FYI a turnpike is 2 53's.

ben45750 04-07-2007 12:35 PM

Cool pic Ian,weird to see them with twin screws (Conway's Sterlings) used to seeing them with the single axle drive.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 06:18 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved