New Posting Requirements
Effective 3/18/10 members will be required to have a minimum of 10 posts before they can pm. This is being initiated due to spam attacks on the website. Hopefully, the change will help to alleviate or at least minimize spam to member pm boxes. Please let one of us know if you continue to have problems with spam being sent via pm. Thanks.
|
I found a solution to this LONG ago! :lol2:
|
What did you find out, golfhobo?
|
He's still peeved that he can't have more than 50 messages in his in-box. :p
|
Quote:
Although, this is the first time I've heard of the spamming. I have not had a problem with any of it, so I don't know what to get to enlarge my penis.:clap: |
I hope this wasn't my fault. http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...on_redface.gif
I recently sent out another round of applications to be a Lingerie Consultant, to all the hott single female Celebrities I could think of. (even the lesbo's like Lindsay Lohan) Did I mistakenly send them here? http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l236/Leland10/24.gif |
:rofl: :eek2:
I thought the minimum was 50 posts? Did it change when they changed over to the new site? I've never gotten any spam either. I never really liked spam. It wouldn't be too bad if it didn't have that gooeey slime in the can. :hellno: :p :D |
Quote:
Because, as I understand it, my entire "allotted memory space" on your HUGE server, is driven by the amount of messages that continue to show in my INBOX. OR.... is just LIMITED to the amount of space that 50 messages would require if still IN my inbox. I've actually tried using the links you offer to download them to my computer, but after doing so, I find they are STILL there! I suppose I have to check to make sure they were downloaded and THEN "delete" them in a page by page effort to get down to a zero balance. I gotta run..... more later. |
Quote:
It seems our once demonized owners and administrators have found a way to spot spammers more quickly and eliminate them, while allowing REAL members to start PMing at an earlier stage. Bravo and Kudos to those who made this decision and change. |
|
Quote:
|
Windy, I think Geeshock is holding out. With a name like his, I'm sure he's tried this himself.
How to; enlarge & have a rock hard boner for 12-16 hours. http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...3D1FA179CC.jpg |
Quote:
|
You have to be a Natural. It's a gift from God. http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...nd10/shrug.gif
But I studied many years of internship at the Bottom Buffing/Breast Finishing School at Juilliard Conservatory of Professional Modeling where I minored as a Groomer. I just have this sticky Court Order preventing me from my career... but I'm no quitter. :smokin: |
Quote:
|
Hi,
Thanks very much for this comment. It help me to think about my ideals. Tks again and pls keep posting. |
Quote:
|
I love the fact that the spammers are posting in the 'posting requirements' topic.
|
Ahhh..... Spam... I remember driving past a huge billboard must nor4th of Albert Lea, MN that was advertising SPAM... It said: "YES, WE DO ANSWER THE 'INGREDIENT' QUESTION.":rofl::rofl::rofl:
But, I'm wondering if they're "hacking" their way in? |
Quote:
|
Yeah.. Welcome back, Mitchno1
Guess you guys missed the uncontrolled "FOOT FETISH" that posted in the comedy section. Either that, or he/she had a sticky "repeat" key on the keyboard... Sure trying to build up his number of posts in a big hurry.:rofl: |
Yeah, their normal MO has been to dig up old threads and put a post in. As of late they are now going after more up to date threads. Since Saturday it's been an all out assault from the spammers. I don't know about the rest of you but I'm not interested in UggBoots.
|
There are some old threads worth reviving.
I wonder if I put a list of my favorite old threads, maybe they could revive one of them for me? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Funny, that "her"(bot)'s first thread was started on 3/13 and her second thread was started exactly one month later on 4/13 ... give or take a day. The thread in the politics forum was on 5/6 (one week later than her last started thread.) Seems our little "family" here at CAD comes around to her attention on a monthly basis, with a weekly follow-up to "data mine" any possible responses. "Her" next thread in the O/O forum (where the money is...) might have been expected on or about 5/13... with NO followup from her on her own threads. But, after no positive responses on her weekly followups, she found that the real action was on the Politics forum. Voila! A "newbie" who hasn't even introduced themselves yet, or told us WHY they are asking these questions about being an O/O... is suddenly interested in our political views about a "non" candidate. Maybe, I have been listening to too many Conservative "conspiracy" theories lately... but, something smells fishy to me. Quote:
Oh yeah... I almost forgot... I brought up this old thread because Clee's "bump" was closed before I could add: Quote:
I just did the same the other day for my company's "personnel policy" handbook. I promise them to be a good driver and stay out of trouble... and they let me stay employed there. It's a Win/Win situation. But, as SOON as I leave the yard I, like every other driver they have, get OUT of those "funky" uniform pants ( at least,) and put on my Blue Jeans! I just would like to point out that... without TRUCKERS.... there would be no need for this website and all the jobs (and profits) it represents. Nothing would get delivered, not even SPAM! [Okay... the trains do carry SOME of the chit.] No, really... that was my only reason for digging up this old thread! I just wanted to sign off on the forum policy. I've read it many times. I TRY to abide by it. If I've stepped on any toes, I apologize. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.