![]() |
Cat C-13 opinions please!
I am shopping for an additional truck and ran across a 2005 with a C-13 at an incredible steal of a price. But is any price low enough to justify buying a Cat C-13? This truck is $22,000 with 350,000 miles, while the same truck with a 14L Detroit is $35,000.
Opinions? |
Originally Posted by Paul McGraw
(Post 475881)
I am shopping for an additional truck and ran across a 2005 with a C-13 at an incredible steal of a price. But is any price low enough to justify buying a Cat C-13? This truck is $22,000 with 350,000 miles, while the same truck with a 14L Detroit is $35,000.
Opinions? |
Originally Posted by Paul McGraw
(Post 475881)
This truck is $22,000 with 350,000 miles, while the same truck with a 14L Detroit is $35,000.
I don't have personal experience with C-13, but it's a CAT! Should do just fine! If everything else is OK, just grab it! |
Originally Posted by solo379
(Post 475887)
Wow! And not the other way around? A you sure?
I don't have personal experience with C-13, but it's a CAT! Should do just fine! If everything else is OK, just grab it! Still, a Mercedes is even worse. The same truck with a Mercedes is $19,000. |
Originally Posted by Paul McGraw
(Post 475896)
has a very bad reputation for reliability, and is known as a the worst engine for fuel mileage. All of this is bad enough, but the C13 has a history of actuator problems that are extremely problematic.
|
Originally Posted by Paul McGraw
(Post 475896)
Yes I am sure. I don't know about dump trucks, but any over the road tractor with a CAT will be thousands cheaper than the exact same truck with the same miles with a Detroit or a Cummins. This is because CAT is exiting the truck market, has a very bad reputation for reliability, and is known as a the worst engine for fuel mileage. All of this is bad enough, but the C13 has a history of actuator problems that are extremely problematic.
Still, a Mercedes is even worse. The same truck with a Mercedes is $19,000. Which Cat engine had the bad injector problems? |
Originally Posted by solo379
(Post 475898)
Well, i don't know what to say. We must be talking about different CAT's. Valve actuators "problem" cost me $680, and couple hours on my C-15, after about 500,000 miles. Fuel mileage average up to date 7.1 mpg. Last week, winter time, 7.55 mpg.
|
Originally Posted by Midnight Flyer
(Post 475900)
Which Cat engine had the bad injector problems?
|
Originally Posted by Paul McGraw
(Post 475911)
The C-15 is supposedly subject to lots of turbo problems. The C-13 has a history of actuator problems.
I'm averaging 6.5 mpg right now....after a lot of work on the truck! :deal: |
Well Paul, you know as well as i do, all engines might have a problems. But as far as I'm concern, CAT is still the best on a market.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 09:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved