Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers

Trucker Forum - Trucking & Driving Forums - Class A Drivers (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/)
-   Owner Operators Forums (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/owner-operators-forums-105/)
-   -   Dropdeck-48' vs longer (https://www.classadrivers.com/forum/owner-operators-forums/37627-dropdeck-48-vs-longer.html)

tracer 06-04-2009 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by GMAN (Post 446412)
I bought a 53' step deck a few years ago. There have been a few loads that I have gotten due in part to the 42' lower deck. I have 11' on top....

What do you guys think of having the upper deck as short as 8'? If my wheelbase is 230", can such a short upper deck cause the trailer to hit the rear fenders of the truck?

tracer 06-04-2009 12:49 PM


Originally Posted by dropdecks (Post 446427)
53 combo for me. Add some levelers and you can carry 60' long without a permit in a lot of states.

How important is the total weight for the stepdeck trailer? All steel ones with wooden floor are so much cheaper. My company requires flats not heavier than 11k lbs, but when I talked to the fleet manager he didn't mention anything like that for a stepdeck, just recommended a 48' transcraft combo. I'd think the weight capacity isn't as important for a step as for a flat. Am I right or wrong?

rank 06-04-2009 01:45 PM


Originally Posted by tracer (Post 452423)
What do you guys think of having the upper deck as short as 8'? If my wheelbase is 230", can such a short upper deck cause the trailer to hit the rear fenders of the truck?

I think it would create problems. I slid my 5th wheel about 5 notches fwd the other day and if I had an 8' deck I think it would have hit.

rank 06-04-2009 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by tracer (Post 452427)
How important is the total weight for the stepdeck trailer? All steel ones with wooden floor are so much cheaper. My company requires flats not heavier than 11k lbs, but when I talked to the fleet manager he didn't mention anything like that for a stepdeck, just recommended a 48' transcraft combo. I'd think the weight capacity isn't as important for a step as for a flat. Am I right or wrong?

Weight is really important for me. Just offloaded two loads this AM. One was a Link Belt 210LX and it weighed 49,000 lbs. The other step had a wheel loader and a dozer that totaled 45,000. You can compete with RGN freight because they can't scale 49,000. You can compete with extendable double drops because regular double drops don't have 42' long decks. The wheel loader was 10' - 7" high by the way.

I shouldn't be telling you this because you run my lanes LOL.

All combos are not created equal. Some only have a aluminum floor and the rest of the trailer is steel. Others have a wood deck and they can be heavy. They also have different cross member spacings and thicknesses. I have heard Transcraft are not solidly built....but that is just hearsay.

LightsChromeHorsepower 06-04-2009 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by GMAN (Post 446686)
For instance, there is one area of California that restricts trailer length to 45'.

Where is that?

tracer 06-05-2009 05:28 AM


Originally Posted by rank (Post 452431)
I think it would create problems. I slid my 5th wheel about 5 notches fwd the other day and if I had an 8' deck I think it would have hit.

So what do you think is the OPTIMUM LENGTH for the upper deck? 10'? 11'? I never pulled a stepdeck before, hence all the stupid questions. I did flatbed last summer, and the rest of the time it was dry van. Worked a 5 ton roll-off tow-truck for 2.5 years though in Toronto, ON ... that gave me lots of experience with smaller machinery and equipment: bobcats, scissorlifts, mini-exacavators etc. Loved working with them.

specialkay 06-06-2009 03:48 PM

I would run as shallow kingpin setting as practical (18-20") with a 10' upper deck and a 40' lower deck and a 10'1" spread. I know before we would get containers out of Baltimore for decent money because they were high cube units and wouldn't go on a flat. If your truck carries a lot of weight on the front axle you could get away with a shorter upper deck because you won't have run your fifth wheel so far ahead. When I pulled a step I was always wishing the upper deck was longer.

GMAN 06-07-2009 07:59 AM

I prefer an 11' upper deck. It offers greater flexibility. I would not personally buy anything smaller than a 10' upper deck.

tracer 06-07-2009 08:47 AM


Originally Posted by specialkay (Post 452604)
If your truck carries a lot of weight on the front axle you could get away with a shorter upper deck because you won't have run your fifth wheel so far ahead. When I pulled a step I was always wishing the upper deck was longer.

I don't follow the logic here ... So you slide the fifth wheel forward because there's too little weight on the front axle? So you like having a long upper deck so that you can bring the trailer closer to the truck in order to compensate for the lack of weight on the front, which you wouldn't have to deal with if you had a shorter upper deck? :) Something's amiss here.

tracer 06-07-2009 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by GMAN (Post 452671)
I prefer an 11' upper deck. It offers greater flexibility. I would not personally buy anything smaller than a 10' upper deck.

With a 10 ft upper deck, you'd have 43' at the bottom. I thought that would be a plus?


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved