![]() |
fuel mileage test results
Truck News, a Canadian trucking rag reported results this month from an independent fuel mileage test on a track in Quebec.
1) Super singles on the drives and the trailer = 9.7% 2) Those areo wings that bolt to the underside of vans came in at ~7% 3) Boat tails were ~5% 4) There was an in-line fuel thingy the improved mileage by ~4% 5) Full fenders 1% |
I think I'm going to start experimenting with a few things in the new year.
|
Is the in-line fuel thingy. the illusive turbo 3000. LOL
|
Originally Posted by no_worries
I think I'm going to start experimenting with a few things in the new year.
So, if your results would be half of what's posted, don't get disappointed! :wink: |
Don't worry solo, my decision has nothing to do with any Canuck studies :lol: Although, I give a lot more credence to much of their info than what comes out down here. With the relatively recent emphasis on fuel mileage, there has been a boom in new studies and technologies resulting in lots of new products. The problem is much of it doesn't go through sufficient testing to verify claims. I'm just going to do my own 8)
Actually, I believe all the numbers in rank's study except for the fuel line thing...I don't know about that one :lol: |
Re: fuel mileage test results
Originally Posted by rank
1) Super singles on the drives and the trailer = 9.7% 2) Those areo wings that bolt to the underside of vans came in at ~7% 3) Boat tails were ~5% 4) There was an in-line fuel thingy the improved mileage by ~4% 5) Full fenders 1% |
Originally Posted by no_worries
I'm just going to do my own 8)
Tho, i still believer, that the most gain, could be achieved from the proper driving technique, I'm always open for the other options... 8) |
Tho, i still believer, that the most gain, could be achieved from the proper driving technique... |
Re: fuel mileage test results
Originally Posted by Dispatch_This
Originally Posted by rank
1) Super singles on the drives and the trailer = 9.7% 2) Those areo wings that bolt to the underside of vans came in at ~7% 3) Boat tails were ~5% 4) There was an in-line fuel thingy the improved mileage by ~4% 5) Full fenders 1% -Test was done in October. -Tests were 100km. -Test conformed to SAE J1321 fuel consumption test procedure - type II -Fuel line thingy was by a company called "Econoco" of St-Jerome, Quebec. Sadly, no mention of the test speed. |
Originally Posted by solo379
Originally Posted by no_worries
I'm just going to do my own 8)
Tho, i still believer, that the most gain, could be achieved from the proper driving technique, I'm always open for the other options... 8) |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 04:06 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved