User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-05-2007, 12:49 AM
fishmonger's Avatar
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lower Delaware
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default Swift and Teamsters?

Hello everyone I'm new around here and considering a career in trucking. From what I'm reading everyone says to stay away from Swift. But I'm at least curious to what is happening with Swift and the Teamsters. Are they going union? If they do will other OTR companies follow suit? Will the Teamsters make Swift a better company to work for? Tougher to get in?

I was raised in a "Union House" as my father has been a member of the STA/ILA for over 35 years so I've seen the benefits/draw backs for working in an organized labor situation 1st hand. To me the benfits outweigh the negitives for the most part.

I'm not really interested in LTL and want to run OTR so I'm thinking Swift (don't shoot me just yet as this is just a thought) may be looking good to get in a union situation and do what I want to do. I'm not sold just yet.

Any information or thoughts on this subject would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in Advanced,

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2007, 12:58 AM
BigWheels's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I'm curious too....

What is happening between Swift and the teamsters?????
__________________
Anything worth living for is worth dying for.
- anonymous
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2007, 01:02 AM
ben45750's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,863
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Yeah me too...... (It will never happen in a million years) but curious what is happening.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2007, 01:02 AM
redsfan's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Near Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 573
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!

Keep em comin, Joe! Keep em comin! I think my side is gonna split!
__________________
The opinions expressed are those of the author's only. They do not represent the views of CAD or of the other members of CAD...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2007, 01:07 AM
BigBird01's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

:lol: I work for swift and still rofl, there is no way in %^*( that swift will go union. Jerry just bought us out again that is all I know of.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2007, 01:09 AM
redsfan's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Near Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 573
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

From what I have read the Teamsters are pushing for the ousting Jerry Moyes and opposing the transaction. I haven't seen anything serious at all as to Swift going "union".

Of course, the only reason that the Teamsters are sticking their nose into the affair is because of their concern for the shareholders... The Teamsters actually own shares in the company, or at least they did in January of this year.

http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_R...t%20buyout.htm
__________________
The opinions expressed are those of the author's only. They do not represent the views of CAD or of the other members of CAD...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2007, 01:22 AM
fishmonger's Avatar
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lower Delaware
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsfan
From what I have read the Teamsters are pushing for the ousting Jerry Moyes and opposing the transaction. I haven't seen anything serious at all as to Swift going "union".

Of course, the only reason that the Teamsters are sticking their nose into the affair is because of their concern for the shareholders... The Teamsters actually own shares in the company, or at least they did in January of this year.

http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_R...t%20buyout.htm
Thanks Reds that was much more informative than your 1st post. Since the teamsters own shares in Swift wouldn't unionizing make it a conflict of interest? The reps would just sit around and talk to themselves trying to keep their own interest (both sides) in mind while screwing the employees.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-05-2007, 01:46 AM
PackRatTDI's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishmonger
Quote:
Originally Posted by redsfan
From what I have read the Teamsters are pushing for the ousting Jerry Moyes and opposing the transaction. I haven't seen anything serious at all as to Swift going "union".

Of course, the only reason that the Teamsters are sticking their nose into the affair is because of their concern for the shareholders... The Teamsters actually own shares in the company, or at least they did in January of this year.

http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_R...t%20buyout.htm
Thanks Reds that was much more informative than your 1st post. Since the teamsters own shares in Swift wouldn't unionizing make it a conflict of interest? The reps would just sit around and talk to themselves trying to keep their own interest (both sides) in mind while screwing the employees.
The Teamsters do something illegal? Say it ain't so, Joe!
__________________
You can take the driver out of the truck but you cant take the truck out of the driver.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2007, 05:11 AM
heavyhaulerss's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: north alabama
Posts: 1,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

does anyone know what the chicago teamsters & the movie casino have in common ? no this is not a joke....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2007, 06:05 AM
greg3564's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leander, TX
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsfan
From what I have read the Teamsters are pushing for the ousting Jerry Moyes and opposing the transaction. I haven't seen anything serious at all as to Swift going "union".

Of course, the only reason that the Teamsters are sticking their nose into the affair is because of their concern for the shareholders... The Teamsters actually own shares in the company, or at least they did in January of this year.

http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_R...t%20buyout.htm
Jerry Moyes bought the company's shares and it is now a privately held company. Hell would freeze over before he let his drivers go union.
__________________
Check out the new 2008 Microsoft Streets and Trips! Sweet!

Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.