| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cluggy619
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 839
Location: Denton, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After hours of writing on this board, I have finally come to a solution.
I'm moving to Mexico. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Goin Fer It
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 1383
Location: Couer d'Alene, ID
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
greg3564 wrote: Goin Fer It wrote: PackRatTDI wrote:
Don't need one, I'm born and raised in the USA, thank you very much.
I would not be surprised if he is here on a pass.
Goin Fer It's Wife
What part of "Don't need one, I'm born and raised in the USA" don't you get? I think PackRat established the fact that he's not "Mexican" or a "wetback" as you put it. Jesh! :roll:
I guess just a FOOL and or a traitor anyone who could possibly entertain the idea that Hemispheric Integration would be good for this country is off of their rocker :roll:
Goin Fer It's Wife |
|
| Back to top |
|
Orangetxguy
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 1472
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
roadrage wrote: This all started back under President Bush senior in 1992 and every President republican and democrate have supported it.
Here is the trick you will not want to drive in Mexico and the lawmakers already know this this is why Mexicans will take all of the runs.There are no rest stops flying j's etc. Mexican ports have updated endlessly the last few years because everything we import from China will come thru Mexico and delivered by Mexican drivers in the States.
Both Democrates and Republicans are hoping this goes over without a fuss from American drivers and citizens they are monitoring the news and congressional e-mails to see if we get pissed or do nothing.
I'm gonna step in here and say, that this assumption is wrong.! President Clinton, in 1993, placed an "Executive Hold", on Trucks from Mexico from traveling on American roads, beyond the 70 mile limit. He issued his order, based on available information, that Mexican Operations did not meet USDOT & FMCSA standards of operation. "It is about the safety of Americans".
NAFTA was not started by Bush 1. NAFTA was started by Reagan. Now, here we are with Bush 2, with a Supreme Court that has 3, Bush 2 appointees, and that Supreme Court has overturned the "Executive Hold" issued by President Clinton, and has determined that Mexican Trucking firms may operate "Nationwide", with the exception that they may not "Pick up & Deliver" between 2 American cities.
That is not word for word from the article..but it covers the Jist of the article. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Fozzy
Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2460
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone who thinks that the Mexican Companies and Drivers are going to cause any MORE problems than the run of the mill American Trucker has cause is being either completely hypocritcal or they are completely clueless and blind. To say that the industry has gotten were it is now and there is nothing wrong with the industry from the ground up is laughable.
I watched the self serving Ron Carey Jr or whatever that teamster wonk's name is on one of the talking head channels this morning. Last week he was probably making the same speech to his union comrades without inserting the word "Mexican".
The Mexicans can not possible do this job any worse than a huge segment of the supertrucker population that is already here destroying the industry.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
sweepwing
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 52
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think that it is a question of whether or how well they can do the job, it is the fact that this is another case of where the chair is being kicked out from under another whole industry of American workers.
The mega-carriers, hooked up with the large corporations, are the ones that can't fill trucks because they will not raise wages and working conditions to the point that Americans will take the jobs. Do you think that the good companies have any trouble filling trucks?
This is all about busting out the American worker down to Mexican levels. Just listen to Bush when he tours Detroit and talks about the need for Americans to be competative with the rest of the world and the need for a "level playing field". He's telling the truth in that he thinks that it is necessary for an American worker to work for the same wages as a Mexican, Indian, or Chinese.
And for Rat spouting his neo-socialist garbage about the global economy, he is correct that there is a failure of capitalism. Our capitalism is failing when we sell out the middle class in our nation in favor of wealth concentration to the global elite who are intentionally breaking down our national identity and sovereignty. The Rat is part of the Hate America First crowd and is commited to changing this country into a steamy, third world hell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
OK
Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:12 pm Post subject: Well Said SweepWing! |
|
|
Well said Sweepwing Well said!
I will include the same post I put in the other thread about this same issue:
My company, Celadon, is one of the worst offenders of this "Corporate Grreed" plan to replace many of their drivers with Mexicans and is chomping at the bit spending 10's of millions ln lobbyists funds to grant amnesty to the 20 million Mexicans already here illegally. They even have a fund to help train the illegals for their American CDL's once they get amnesty.
And yes, I'm leaving soon.
Check out this link from an earlier poster. Read all about in the Tombstone Tumbleweed, Page 8:
http://tombstonetumbleweed.com/PDF_Archives/TumbleSep0105.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
mowman
Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 61
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John Hill, head of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration was on CSPAN's Washington Journal call in show.
It was quite interesting.
He said that the national average for US trucks failing a DOT inspection and being put out of services is 23%. The rate is 21% for Mexican drivers inspected at the border or within the 35 mile limit. That's surprising.
He also said that this test program (100 companies from each country) will be safe because they're looking at the best of the best Mexican companies to participate.
Now what kind of nonsense is this? They're cherry-picking what should be a representative sampling of ALL Mexican companies to skew the results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
OK
Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mowman wrote: John Hill, head of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration was on CSPAN's Washington Journal call in show.
It was quite interesting.
He said that the national average for US trucks failing a DOT inspection and being put out of services is 23%. The rate is 21% for Mexican drivers inspected at the border or within the 35 mile limit. That's surprising.
Well for me this is not about the safety of the Mexican trucks but about my Company (and others) seeking to replace most of their Drivers with either Mexicans with H1B visa's or to train and hire some of the 20 Million Illegals about to get Amnesty!
Celadon has made it clear during their Investor Conferences (link avail on Celadon Website) that they intend to use their Jaguar (Mexican) division to run as many loads as they can. They state to their investors that this will substancially increase profits due to the much lower wage paid to the Jaugar drivers!
The president (T. Glaser) has even even sent a private letter to the Premium Stockholders that describes the exact intentions of Celadon in relation to immirgant (Mexican) workers. They talk about the vast sums that will be garnered by the stockholers once the plan is achieved!
Sure sounds like a pack of Traitors and Profiteers to me?
Something must be done about this NAFTA agreement with Mexico.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
mowman
Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 61
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK wrote: Celadon has made it clear during their Investor Conferences (link avail on Celadon Website) that they intend to use their Jaguar (Mexican) division to run as many loads as they can. They state to their investors that this will substancially increase profits due to the much lower wage paid to the Jaugar drivers!
Are you prepared to walk to another company? Are the other drivers in your company as well informed as you? How do they feel about it?
OK wrote:
Something must be done about this NAFTA agreement with Mexico....
Patty Murray (D-Washington) is holding a hearing March 8 regarding this. I think she heads the House Transportation committee.
Good grief. I'm going to align with the left. |
|
| Back to top |
|
OK
Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mowman wrote:
Are you prepared to walk to another company? Are the other drivers in your company as well informed as you? How do they feel about it?
[
Oh Yea! I have already applied to Crete at a starting wage that pays about $8k more per year They ran my DAC (I know cause I sent for a copy of what they got soon after applying) then called an said I could go to their nearest terminal (about 35 miles away) get a truck, a load and head to their HDQ in Nebraska for orientation!
Yea, I'v spoken to a few other drivers about their plans and they didn't seemed concerned at all? They are all too worried about themselves and their next paycheck. Pitiful, yes?
This is the kind of apathy that will sink this industry! |
|
| Back to top |
|
mowman
Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 61
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK wrote: Oh Yea! I have already applied to Crete at a starting wage that pays about $8k more per year
You deserve a lot of credit for taking action. You're right. Not many will. I don't know what the answers are, but I'm doing all I can to spread the word about what's happening.
I think that's a first step. I talk it up on the CB. It's amazing how few drivers out there know what's going on.
Education is a good first step. |
|
| Back to top |
|
OK
Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mowman wrote: OK wrote: Oh Yea! I have already applied to Crete at a starting wage that pays about $8k more per year
You deserve a lot of credit for taking action. You're right. Not many will. I don't know what the answers are, but I'm doing all I can to spread the word about what's happening.
Appreciate that. We must all spread the message and I commend you for being someone who at least is nvolved and not just worried about his next paycheck. Of course that's why were all members here.... because we all want to be involved... yes?
What do you think would happen if some drivers started putting envelopes under the windshield wipers of every Celadon truck they see at truck stops and inside that envelope was a couple of pages stating THE FACTS about the Company and their plans? |
|
| Back to top |
|
merrick4
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 865
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mowman wrote: OK wrote: Celadon has made it clear during their Investor Conferences (link avail on Celadon Website) that they intend to use their Jaguar (Mexican) division to run as many loads as they can. They state to their investors that this will substancially increase profits due to the much lower wage paid to the Jaugar drivers!
Are you prepared to walk to another company? Are the other drivers in your company as well informed as you? How do they feel about it?
OK wrote:
Something must be done about this NAFTA agreement with Mexico....
Patty Murray (D-Washington) is holding a hearing March 8 regarding this. I think she heads the House Transportation committee.
Good grief. I'm going to align with the left.
Don't worry Mowman, I said the same thing yesterday, but only aligning myself with the right, as I had to agree with Rush Limbaugh on this. Really BOTH parties are against this. This is an American issue not right or left. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Mr. Ford95
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 1818
Location: Orange, VA
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Can any of you actually show where the trucking industry falls under NAFTA?? The Mexican O/O's do not want this deal to go thru because it allows the US drivers the same rights to go into Mexico. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Twilight Flyer
Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Posts: 5486
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: Can any of you actually show where the trucking industry falls under NAFTA?? The Mexican O/O's do not want this deal to go thru because it allows the US drivers the same rights to go into Mexico.
The argument being that most American drivers will probably NOT want to head south across the border.
Again, this is a heated subject with a devastatingly large dividing line. In other words, there is no middle road here. So discuss it all you want, but keep the name-calling and anger to a minimum. Remember the saying...once you've resorted to name-calling, you've already lost the argument.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |