Ok I know this post has been dead for a bit, but I have a question :?: I used to manage auto repair shops for a large chain. Over the 11 yrs I had hired "5" female auto technician. They were all entry level tech's fresh out of tech school and qualified from that stand point.
After the same interview process that I always used these are the ones that were hired. Well 2 quit within 2 weeks claiming that the conditions were too dirty and hot (this was the summer in Chicago area) and that no one would help them with lifting things like the tires to back on the cars :?: .
One got pregnant so I moved her upfront as a sales person until she left for maternity, she then decided to not return to take care of her child (this I had no problem with except that she was a good employee

).
Another was a great tech especially with drivability problems, but she fit the feminist appearence stereotype. She left to move to SoCal so that leaves the last one.
This one was lazy, but not stupid. She would flirt (literally sit on their tool boxes and cross her legs and giggle and toss her hair) around with the male techs to get them to do her work (as a down side to the males of the world this worked

). She would call in sick about twice a month. She also had issues following company guidelines for torquing wheels and double checking oil levels (more to follow on this). When I approached her with this and tried to fire her for attendence and failure to follow directions the district mgr. said I could not because she had called and said she was being discriminated against :twisted: . So I put up with her for another month or so and finally was able to let her go due to not torquing the lugnuts on a car that the wheel came off of (this cost me $7500 in personal bonus money :evil: and the company was sued for over a million because of personal injury and "future fear of driving

" stated by the plaintiffs legal staff). My point is with the last one that if she had not been female I could have gotten rid of her no problems and prevented this costly and tragic outcome. I truly beleive that this is why some people are hesitant to hire
minorities in any field of work is that they are afraid if they do the right thing which would be to give them a fair chance to prove they can do the job they will not be able to do anything about it if the applicant can not.
Now I know that these are no more of a problem then I had over time with male techs but with them I could get rid of them with a couple of simple write ups. I know that the entire gender can not be judged on one example but I can tell you that it certainly made me hesitatant to hire another female in that industry which is really sad

.
So now after all this can you tell me what I did wrong or what can be done better to
EQUAL out all sides of employment.
Sorry about the long post, but I get I little heated at this subject. :wink: