What brand filters do you like, and why ?

[Bobby]

Also, do any of you run additional filters ( fuel or oil ) from what came stock on the engine ?

[Rev.Vassago]

Fleetguard. You get what you pay for. :wink:

[bob h]

Also, do any of you run additional filters ( fuel or oil ) from what came stock on the engine ?

IMO;

Cat engine? ... Cat filters.

Detroit engine? ... DDC filters.

Cummins engine? ... Fleetguard filters.

I am of the belief that if more filtration was required for the engine, it would be required by the manufacturer .... can't see them skipping out on something that they have to provide warranty on.

Any filtration problems I've ever encountered working as a technician were NOT related to lack of additional filtration, it's always an issue of not following the base recommendations for filtration. Eg - plugged filters from lack of maintenance, or misapplication of filters due to selecting the "cheap" filters off the shelf that "fit".

[Bobby]

Fleetguard is what I've been using, or the Kenworth dealer has been installing. I just want what's best, hence the question.

Thanks

[Bobby]

Yes, it's an 2001 C15. I've had it serviced at the KW dealer and they do have Cat filters, I guess I'll have to request them.
Thanks

[watevr777]

lets see

Cat are made by wix
Detroit ------fleetgaurd or donalson ....can't remember
Cummins
Basically they all meet the Manufacures Requirements and cannot force you to use a certian brand

Like
Rev said you get what you pay for

[Maniac]

Basically they all meet the Manufacures Requirements and cannot force you to use a certian brand

While this is true I know that Cat will stand behind their filter if it causes an engine problem, where as if you put a Fleetgaurd or Wix on a Cat they (Cat) will NOT stand behind it.

And you DON'T have to use the manufacturers filter or anything else they sell.

[bcbasher]

fleetgard on my cummins. that's whats always been ran on it and that's what i plan on running on it. do the job very well i have never had a problem with them.

[bob h]

Fleetguard is what I've been using, or the Kenworth dealer has been installing. I just want what's best, hence the question.

Thanks

if you're running cummins, you have the best ;0)

[Buzzard 21]

I know for a fact that Caterpillar filters are not made by Wix. Cat owns a filter plant that is called AFSI. "Advanced Filtration Systems Inc" The best way I have seen to compare filters go get one of each and cut them apart and just see for yourself. Donaldson used to make some of their filters but WIX has never been involved with Cat's filters.

[Bobby]

I know for a fact that Caterpillar filters are not made by Wix. Cat owns a filter plant that is called AFSI. "Advanced Filtration Systems Inc" The best way I have seen to compare filters go get one of each and cut them apart and just see for yourself. Donaldson used to make some of their filters but WIX has never been involved with Cat's filters.

Yes, I did a web search, and AFSI is owned by Cat partnered with Donaldson. About all they make, 92%, is Cat filters.

Also, Cummins now owns Fleetguard.

[Birken Vogt]

I generally use Fleetguard and have found they are usually cheaper than comparable Wix or NAPA, and reputedly better.

Birken

[bob h]

lets see

Cat are made by wix
Detroit ------fleetgaurd or donalson ....can't remember
Cummins
Basically they all meet the Manufacures Requirements and cannot force you to use a certian brand

Like
Rev said you get what you pay for

cat's IS NOT made by wix, they make their own filters.

detroit filters are certainly NOT built by cummins (fleetguard).

[Bobby]

Well, I put Cat filters on this last service. They were a little more but not that much...about $15/20 more for all 3 filters over the Fleetguards.

I did see a display compairing Cat filters to every other brand at the dealer.
They had them all cut open to show how their made. The Cat use a nylon center that the oil/fuel flows thru, The others all use a stamped tin center. Their thinking is " no chance of metal contamination w/nylon.
They also have nylon rings around the paper element to keep it spaced evenly so it won't bunch up, none of the other filters did this either.
There were other differance too, but overall IMO they were trying to make a better filter.

[Birken Vogt]

Nylon center is also cheaper for them to make but of course they are not going to tell you that nor are they going to pass it on to you...as with all information consider the source and their motivations....

Birken

[brian]

baldwin filters, because their the best and thats what I demand.


as far as non factory filters go I run a bypass filter, I made the mount on a bridgeport mill and it also uses a baldwin filter, it takes in about 15% of what the factory filtration system takes in and filters it even further, I find it makes a huge difference in my oil change intervals.

[Bobby]

Nylon center is also cheaper for them to make but of course they are not going to tell you that nor are they going to pass it on to you...as with all information consider the source and their motivations....

Birken

Motivation ? I figured a company as BIG as Caterpillar sure didn't need to start a small filter mfg. plant (165 employee's ) to make cheap filters for extra money... and create risk for all their products.
Just the opposite IMO, make a better filter... they benifit the customer benifits.

[bob h]

Bobby wrote; Well, I put Cat filters on this last service. They were a little more but not that much...about $15/20 more for all 3 filters over the Fleetguards.

Bob h wrote; good choice

I did see a display compairing Cat filters to every other brand at the dealer.
They had them all cut open to show how their made.
The Cat use a nylon center that the oil/fuel flows thru, The others all use a stamped tin center.

the cutaways can be an eye opener; in my shop, i have about a dozen different makes all cut open for a good view... the differences are pretty obvious in many. the nylon center tube is stronger than the stamped tubes so that justifies the increased cost of production as well, the center tube is what stops the filter media from collapsing and blocking oil flow

Their thinking is " no chance of metal contamination w/nylon.
They also have nylon rings around the paper element to keep it spaced evenly so it won't bunch up,

filter bunching has been almost eliminated by their use of "spiral roving"......... bunching causes restriction to flow

none of the other filters did this either.

the roving is patented by cat

There were other differance too,

the filter media is molded to the end caps instead of gluing as the other mans do, they also use a cast aluminum base and a thick metal wall can... all demonstrates a "no expense spared" approach to filter manufacturing intended for their own equipment --- you simply cannot acquire a better filter for your cat engine

but overall IMO they were trying to make a better filter.

[Buzzard 21]

Nylon center is also cheaper for them to make but of course they are not going to tell you that nor are they going to pass it on to you...as with all information consider the source and their motivations....

Birken

Well maybe you should check with your filter manufacture of choice and ask them if they have a 2 micron fuel filter. When they tell you yes ask them if it is an absolute rating or a nominal rating. The difference is a nominal rating is 50% effective an absolute rating is 98% effective. The last time I checked Cat was the only one that had a 2 micron absolute rated filter. How many of those cheap filters do you have to run to pay for 1 injector failure due to improper filtration. IE "Don't you think that the manufacture knows what they need on an engine for filters?" For me the extra 4 or 5 bucks for the Cat filter is worth it.

[Blacksheep]

My Cat gets Cat filters. :wink: