Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: NASCAR sued and loses

  1. #1
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default NASCAR sued and loses

    AT&T filed suit with NASCAR and won it's suit. The #31 Cingular car of Jeff Burton will have the AT&T logo emblazoned for the rest of the year starting in tomorrow night's All-Star race.

    I had a good feeling this was a fight NASCAR would not win. It is not going to hurt Nextel/Sprint in the long run like NASCAR and Sprint kept piping about. The title is still going to be the Nextel Cup, the Series is still the Nextel Cup Series. Time for Shell or RCR to file suit over Harvick not being allowed to wear a helmet with a large Shell on it. Whatever happened to sponsor's like Winston and Unocal 76?? Oh wait....that's right, NASCAR went mainstream and all corporate. Get Brian France out and bring back racing the way it should be and used to be, un-coporated.

  2. #2
    Jackrabbit379's Avatar
    Jackrabbit379 is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wichita Falls,Tx
    Posts
    7,100

    Default

    Hmm. Weird. Is it because NEXTEL is the NASCAR sponser, and because AT&T is another phone company? I'm sorry, Mr. Ford, I'm not a moron, but it doesnt make sinse, filing the suit. Why didnt NASCAR just let Cingular change their decal logo back to AT&T without having to throw a fit?

    Or, did I miss everything?(Im known for that at times) :?

  3. #3
    Crash935 is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Grand Rapids MI
    Posts
    369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackrabbit379
    Hmm. Weird. Is it because NEXTEL is the NASCAR sponser, and because AT&T is another phone company?

    That was exactly the reason, NASCAR and Nextel had a contract tht said any wireless phone companies that were a sponsor prior to Nextel coming in could continue to be a sponsor, NASCAR was not to allow any new wireless sponsors while Nextel was the primary sponsor. Then AT&T bought Cingular and AT&T tried to put their logos on Burtons car, NASCAR said no to the wireless part of AT&T but they could put their other services on it and then the pissing match started followed by the lawsuit.
    My dispatcher wants to know why im not there yet, she says its only 2 inches away when she measured it on her map!

  4. #4
    Jackrabbit379's Avatar
    Jackrabbit379 is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wichita Falls,Tx
    Posts
    7,100

    Default

    Ok. I see. I was thinking that, but wasnt sure.

  5. #5
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    The problem was, Nextel was bought by Sprint. That should mean that the contract Nextel signed with NASCAR is null and void. If your going to allow the title sponsor to change names, then you have to allow the others to change names at least once also.

    It's sad we have sponsor's in NASCAR that are crybags. Winston was never like this as the title sponsor. Teams are already struggling to find full-time sponsor's and NASCAR is making it that much harder to find them by signing these stupid deals of exclusivity for certain sponsor's. Ok, they are the official sponsor, whatever. Don't be limiting other sponsor's though, fans already know who the official one's are and won't forget it. Nextel/Sprint is just too naive, people will use them if they have great service, if they do not, people will not use them. Stop holding other NASCAR sponsor's as the reason to your failures and shortcomings as a company.

  6. #6
    thebaldeagle655's Avatar
    thebaldeagle655 is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Wichita Falls, Tx
    Posts
    414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
    The problem was, Nextel was bought by Sprint. That should mean that the contract Nextel signed with NASCAR is null and void. If your going to allow the title sponsor to change names, then you have to allow the others to change names at least once also.
    Wrong, When Nextel signed the contract they were smart enough to include a clause allowing them 1 rename in the contract.

    I knid of feel that NASCAR "fought" the lawsuit jus tenough to make a show of good faith to NEXTEL. NEXTEL is paying 75 million a year for 10 years to be the "Exclusive Wireless Provider of Nascar" and in their contract for this AT&T was specifically listed as a forbidden sponsor of any future NEXTEL Cup team/car.

    I can see why they would not want to spend 750 million and not get the max for their money but I can also see why NASCAR wants AT&T's money too!

    Also, we can bet we have not seen the last of the lawsuits on this one!
    REMEMBER, guns don't kill! It's the jealous husband that comes home early!

  7. #7
    Jackrabbit379's Avatar
    Jackrabbit379 is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wichita Falls,Tx
    Posts
    7,100

    Default

    Crazy stuff. Bring back The Winston Cup. :P

  8. #8
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    Haven't heard for sure, but NASCAR had filed an emergency motion to not allow Burton's car to be changed over to AT&T for tonight's race. If it was granted, then Burton's car will either still show Cingular or will be blank.

    the "Exclusive Wireless Provider of Nascar"
    Bald, that is the thing, AT&T can simply say, we want on the car for our Home service not our Wireless. NASCAR cannot say no to that without being sued and losing. NASCAR allowed Shell into the show because they are not there for their gasoline(which would have pissed off Sunoco and violated that contract.) Shell wanted in for their lubes and got in. Motorola will be the next one to sue if they still want on Robby Gordon's car. They do not offer Wireless Service, just phones. They are Nextel's primary phone source yet Nextel told NASCAR they were not allowed in per the contract. :?:

  9. #9
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    Ok, word is in. Nextel is not planning to sue NASCAR. They are instead going to join NASCAR in their fight against AT&T. The injuction NASCAR filed this morning was not granted so AT&T will be on Burton's car tonight. NASCAR instead filed another motion higher up in the court's that won't be heard until mid-week this week. If NASCAR somehow wins AT&T will be off Burton's car for the Coke 600.

    Whew, what a mess. Stop the bickering and let'em race, NASCAR is more enjoyable that way.

  10. #10
    Jackrabbit379's Avatar
    Jackrabbit379 is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wichita Falls,Tx
    Posts
    7,100

    Default

    That's dumb. Just race, and let everyone use who they want to use as their cell phone provider. :P

  11. #11
    mike3fan's Avatar
    mike3fan is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    2,756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
    Winston was never like this as the title sponsor. Teams are already struggling to find full-time sponsor's and NASCAR is making it that much harder to find them by signing these stupid deals of exclusivity for certain sponsor's.
    Winston did have exclusivity in thier contract,Skoal and the others got around it by using smokeless tobaco sponsorship.
    "I love college football. It's the only time of year you can walk down the street with a girl in one arm and a blanket in the other, and nobody thinks twice about it." --Duffy Daugherty



  12. #12
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    Skoal and the others did not get around RJ Reynolds/Winston by using smokeless tobacco. RJ Reynolds was forced to introduce smokeless by the US govt. That same crackdown was what forced RJ Reynolds to get out of NASCAR and the NHRA.

    Skoal, Copenhagen and Kodiak were chew only so the smokeless wouldn't even be up their alley since you don't smoke chew.

  13. #13
    mike3fan's Avatar
    mike3fan is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    2,756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
    Skoal and the others did not get around RJ Reynolds/Winston by using smokeless tobacco. RJ Reynolds was forced to introduce smokeless by the US govt. That same crackdown was what forced RJ Reynolds to get out of NASCAR and the NHRA.

    Skoal, Copenhagen and Kodiak were chew only so the smokeless wouldn't even be up their alley since you don't smoke chew.
    You agree that Winston had exclusive rights as the only cigarette sponsor though right?
    "I love college football. It's the only time of year you can walk down the street with a girl in one arm and a blanket in the other, and nobody thinks twice about it." --Duffy Daugherty



  14. #14
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    I would have to say yes, I reckon. They came in before my time so I have no idea. All I can remember is Winston sponsoring a car, Jimmy Spencer and Hut Stricklin in the #23 Smokin' Joe's car. Don't remember a Marlboro car out there though.

  15. #15
    mike3fan's Avatar
    mike3fan is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    2,756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
    I would have to say yes, I reckon. They came in before my time so I have no idea. All I can remember is Winston sponsoring a car, Jimmy Spencer and Hut Stricklin in the #23 Smokin' Joe's car. Don't remember a Marlboro car out there though.
    Yeah all I know is what alot of the host on Sirius Nascar radio say ,but I do remember that smokin Joe's car,wonder what the deal was there.
    "I love college football. It's the only time of year you can walk down the street with a girl in one arm and a blanket in the other, and nobody thinks twice about it." --Duffy Daugherty



  16. #16
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    Smokin' Joe's was part of RJ Reynolds if I remember correctly. Could be wrong and it wouldn't be the first time. :wink: When Spencer was driving the car, he also had it decaled with Winston on it at times, particulary when they had the NO Bull races and stuff, and Joe Camel(a brand of RJ Reynolds) was also seen on it.

  17. #17
    yoopr is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    12,865

    Default

    It's a pretty confusing Issue and I think NASCAR is putting it into the Wringer.
    There are Federal Laws on the books about Monopolies.
    My personal opinion is that NASCAR has grown so fast the past few years they're now stubbing their toes and if it keeps up they're going to start losing fans.

  18. #18
    Mr. Ford95's Avatar
    Mr. Ford95 is offline Super Moderator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange, VA
    Posts
    4,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yoopr
    There are Federal Laws on the books about Monopolies.
    That is why Kentucky Speedway is suing NASCAR and ISC, to break up the monopoly. If they are going to do that though, they need to sue SMI and Bruton Smith also. Only Dover and Indy are independently owned. SMI and ISC own the rest of the Cup tracks.

    I don't blame ISC for looking like a monopoly. Some of the tracks they have bought were not because they just had to have them but because the track simply could not operate no longer on their own. Martinsville is one that sold out. When Mr. Campbell died, he left the track to a trustee. She died not that long after and the family owned track had to sell because nobody else was in line to take it from what I read without going to court.

  19. This ad will disappear if you login

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0