User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 08-26-2016, 12:25 AM
Roadhog's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tartuga .......me thinks
Posts: 9,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David714104 View Post
----- Worse yet, how about the trucks going 65 passing those going 64.9. Governors are and inexact science.
That isn't the worst of it. The poor driver who has a defective hymanburg compensator all dried out, and your truck pegs out at 65.9mph now yer looking at a $2000 fine.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-27-2016, 12:03 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

If you don't want speed limiters in trucks, you need to take advantage of the comment time to express your views. Be concise and factual in your opposition. Write and/or call your congressman to see if they will take a stand against having speed limiters in trucks. As I recall, Ontario had a law that forced truckers to limit speeds of trucks. I believe that legislation was later changed. It isn't any other province but Ontario that was involved in the speed limiter issue, as I recall. If you don't like a bit of legislation that is being proposed, don't just complain about it on a trucking forum. Take action. Write and make phone calls. I guarantee you that those on the other side will make their views known. What these politicians and special interests may not be telling about speed is that the speed limiters won't make any difference with accidents. Drivers can still speed through work areas and places where posted speeds are lower than what the speed limiters will allow. It isn't speed that causes accidents. It is the poor judgment of the drivers. Besides, they may not be telling the entire story. Of those accidents reported I wonder how many the truck driver was a fault and what percentage had the 4 wheeler at fault?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-28-2016, 01:14 AM
Jackrabbit379's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wichita Falls,Tx
Posts: 7,197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Is that for everyone? Even for owner operators?
You know them outlaws ain't going for that! What about older trucks? 359's, old W9's etc? How do they install limiters on them?

Could you imagine a long nose Pete with a speed limiter?
__________________


http://watsonsysco.com/
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-28-2016, 07:03 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackrabbit379 View Post
Is that for everyone? Even for owner operators?
You know them outlaws ain't going for that! What about older trucks? 359's, old W9's etc? How do they install limiters on them?

Could you imagine a long nose Pete with a speed limiter?
This finally broke as national news yesterday, the trucks from 1990 and back, are grandfathered in the current proposal to not be limited, so as I said, we will see a run on the older trucks! The problem is that the ATA has joined the private group that is pushing this. The ATA is looking to the fuel savings mainly.

More than likely, owner ops won't have a choice, to register with DOT you will have to submit to having the limiter installed via the ECU. You don't agree, your not legal to run then, that is how they will force everyone to do it. And they will prolly start making manufacturers change the gearing to limit the overall top speed for new trucks, no way around it then without some serious money having to be dropped!

As GMAN said, make your voice heard, it's not set in stone to happen yet. Many seem to favor 68 mph if the limit comes in.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-29-2016, 10:41 PM
Jackrabbit379's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wichita Falls,Tx
Posts: 7,197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Everything is going dumb. Common sense has gone out the window.
__________________


http://watsonsysco.com/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-29-2016, 11:24 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

The head of the private group pushing this lost their son years back to a single truck that was "speeding" at 8 mph over the limit............the truck plowed into the back of the stopped car. So how fast was the truck going then? I can't find that info.

Some outlets are now quoting the FMCSA as saying this will only be on new models, no retrofitting to previous models....as in, only on vehicles in the 2017 model and beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-31-2016, 06:32 AM
belpre122's Avatar
Local Advocate
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Speedway Indiana
Posts: 1,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95 View Post

As GMAN said, make your voice heard, it's not set in stone to happen yet. Many seem to favor 68 mph if the limit comes in.

All due respect Mr. Ford. Looks like there is too much momentum on this one. If the ATA is behind this reg.......not a whole lot the individual can do at this point. (IMHO)

How's that truck stop tonight GDAD?
__________________
Fuel for free. Pre/Post trip for free. Sit at shipper/receiver for free. "Work 80-100, log 70, get paid for 40." Welcome to OTR coolie carrier truck driving!

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-31-2016, 08:01 AM
belpre122's Avatar
Local Advocate
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Speedway Indiana
Posts: 1,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95 View Post
The head of the private group pushing this lost their son years back to a single truck that was "speeding" at 8 mph over the limit............the truck plowed into the back of the stopped

How quickly we forget. What about the 'safety oriented' CRETE driver that drove over top of seven children and a mother a few years back? After driving for something like 34 hours! I think that CRETE's "OUR BEST RESOURCE IS SITTING HERE" trailers are the ultimate asskiss to the FedDot." LOL I bet those poor schmucks hate pulling those trailers. Oh my god! So horrible to see those things. What a joke. Albeit, a very very bad one.

Agreed, this has nothing to do with speed. Regulation is what this is about.

'The MAN will have his way' No matter what we think.
__________________
Fuel for free. Pre/Post trip for free. Sit at shipper/receiver for free. "Work 80-100, log 70, get paid for 40." Welcome to OTR coolie carrier truck driving!

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-01-2016, 06:39 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Yes Belpre, it's coming but make your voice heard as to what the max limit should be. They haven't decided on the limit and would like to hear opinions so they say! The heads of the group want 55 mph, the FMCSA wants 65 but would be fine with 68. Personally, at this point I could care less. Only road near me that is above 65, I rarely go that far South. Anyways, my current truck tops out at 68 but I tend to sit at 65 as my max.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-01-2016, 09:39 PM
Roadhog's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tartuga .......me thinks
Posts: 9,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

.....I know.... ... we could form a National Truckers Strike.
What do you guys think?

__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.