KC0IV, I apologize if you took that to mean you, by the time I had gotten to that point in the message, it had basically become general in nature. That post started directed towards you, at the statment regarding the when and where, which was in the original post. And I did place the (whoever), which was meant to direct to those that it would apply to.
I try not to imply that anyone does anything illegal, until that point were they have basically incriminated themselves or admitted to wrongdoing.
As far as the PA law or whether or not the feds were involved, I have no idea, like I said, I was waived through the checkpoint and not inspected, thus did not have the oppurtunity to ask. I personally saw the confiscated equipment on the back of a PennDot Truck next to the inspection area. The article in the paper that I read was in actual print, so I made the mistake (I suppose) of assuming it would be in their online archive.
I far as binary and morse code, your statements and fact make since, but, no matter how you stack it, Morse Code has been credited as being the first form of digital communication, regardless of current definitions. I cannot find the article copy, but an article printed in QST magazine, back in the '60's referenced Morse Code as being the first digital form of communication. That was my only point, it is the grandfather to what is known as digital today.
Another note, I draft and sent an e-mail to the FCC Enforcement Division today, referencing several issues that have been brought up on this and other threads. With any luck I will receive a response in a few days, and will be happy to share the findings.
They have come down hard on radio shops over the last year or so for selling non-type accepted radios and/or making modifications to such radios. I suppose the fixed targets are easier to enforce than the moving ones. There are several references on the FCC Enforcement site, but make note, there is a disclaimer on the site stating, that not all current, pending or past actions are posted on the site. This may well explain the lack of information regarding actions against individuals or companies.




Reply With Quote

: It doesn't mean there aren't people working diligently behind the scenes to put a hurt on the dealers AND the users of illegal radios. It is a matter of the outlaw radio users who believe they have "rights" to talk on 'them there channels" versus the legitimate, authorized, licensed users of spectrum. Right vs wrong. Right usually prevails. When it doesn't, we ALL suffer, for when the forces of evil (and the theft of radio spectrum is as much a crime as as any other because it creates a problem for other users) win, we suffer a breakdown in moral fiber and character. Each successive "win" for that which is WRONG, eats away at the foundations of law that sustain us and damages society.

