User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-08-2011, 01:41 PM
sc5952's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Great Bend, KS
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default possibly buying new truck-help

Need opinions on trucks. Buying new (to me) sleeper truck 1998-2005. I am needing truck that has plenty of power but also need something that gets best mpg at 70 mph. What's your guys opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2011, 02:50 PM
crb
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Drive slower.

Depends on what you consider good mpg. We got 6.5 in a cfi t2000 with a c15 13sp running 65 to 70. Not sure what rear end ratio it had. The t600 setup the same got a little better. If you stay 2004 and older you can avoid the egr junk.

Last edited by crb; 12-08-2011 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2011, 03:39 PM
sc5952's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Great Bend, KS
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

6.5 would be awesome. Im used 5.25-5.3 in one truck and 4.5 in other. The 4.5 mpg one we are working on because it should get better, I will know soon what it's doing now, my driver filling up soon. I replaced thermostats in it because were stuck wide open. Also was going to change air charge cooler before it went out last but they sent me incorrect cooler so sent out without swapping (has little leaks where cores/tank meet), it will be swapped Saturday morning before I send him back to Texas.

Last edited by sc5952; 12-08-2011 at 03:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2011, 08:00 PM
Copperhead's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kellogg, IA
Posts: 534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Everything is relative, and one person's mpg in their operation might be good, but it would be horrible in another operation. 6.5 average in my operation would cause me to pull out my .45 and shoot the truck and put it out of my misery. I won't settle for less than 7. But then, 70 mph is not my game. Fuel, tires, and maintenance running like that is too wasteful for my taste. I prefer to take more money home. I can bury the speedometer in my truck, but it will never happen.

But that is my operation. I wouldn't expect that if I was pulling logs or hogs. But for general freight, I wouldn't settle for less.
__________________
Freedom does not mean the choice to do whatever you want. It means the choice to do what you ought.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-18-2011, 12:38 AM
firebird_1252's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 975
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

it really depends on a lot of things. where do you go? what kind of loads do you pull? i'd try to find a pre emissions detroit. that should do the job for you. a lot of people call me crazy.. the 14l detroits are hard to beat.. when they run right.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-18-2011, 02:16 AM
rank's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sc5952 View Post
.....need something that gets best mpg at 70 mph. What's your guys opinions?
No truck gets its' best fuel mileage at 70 mph.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-18-2011, 02:09 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I would go with an engine with around 400-450 hp and 10 speed with 454 rears. That would give you at least 6 mpg+ have good pulling power. You could probably improve your mpg with something around 323, but might lose some of your pulling power.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2011, 11:55 PM
classictruckman's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa Valley Ontario, Canada
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMAN View Post
I would go with an engine with around 400-450 hp and 10 speed with 454 rears. That would give you at least 6 mpg+ have good pulling power. You could probably improve your mpg with something around 323, but might lose some of your pulling power.
4.54 sounds pretty slow for a highway tractor, my truck has a 4.64 and it runs almost 1700 rpm at 62 mph, my dads truck has a 4.33 rear end and I would still consider that a truck which only spends some time on the highway.
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:12 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.