Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 68

Thread: 2006 387 MPG Results

  1. #1
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default 2006 387 MPG Results

    Ok, so I figured I would start a thread with my different MPG numbers for the new truck.

    I run a dedicated lane, 4,500lbs down and empty back in a J&L Dry Bulk tank for roughly 2,700 miles round trip. My route never changes and it goes as follows:
    Westville, IN (US421 to I-94 to I-57) to Tuscola, IL. Then from there I take I-57 to I-55, I-40, I-30 to Texarkana then AR549 to US71, I-220, I-20 to US79 to US59 thru Houston to Victoria then TX185 to Seadrift.

    On my 1st trip this week I set my cruise at 1,350rpm which put me at 67mph. I got fuel and avg 7.2mpg for the trip down.
    On the way back, i set my cruise at 1,250rpm which was 62mph and I avg 7.85mpg.

    Next week i am going to set it at the 1,250rpm down loaded and see if it makes a difference with the 4,500lbs in the tank, which i doubt it will, but ya never know.

  2. #2
    Malaki86's Avatar
    Malaki86 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    3,997

    Default

    Since you run the same route with the same freight, I'd do a week at each RPM, then use the average for that week as the MPG for that RPM. Even though minor, things such as the wind, temperature and humidity will affect the MPG's. Just an idea, anyway.
    Wanna play a couple online games that are absolutely free? These are the games I play on a very regular basis:
    Battle of the West & Mobs Law

  3. #3
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malaki86 View Post
    Since you run the same route with the same freight, I'd do a week at each RPM, then use the average for that week as the MPG for that RPM. Even though minor, things such as the wind, temperature and humidity will affect the MPG's. Just an idea, anyway.
    Yes, thats my plan...next week will be at 1,250rpm for the entire trip. Then the following week will be at 1,350rpm for the whole week, then I'll go 1400rpm (70mph) in the states I can go 70 in, the others will be at the 67mph setting

  4. #4
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    So, what's the point? What are you trying to find out? With that kind of weight, you don't need to worry about pulling power. You want better MPG, you run between 1250-1300 RPM. In your case it's 62-64 mph. You want to drive "faster", you'll have to pay for it. That simple. Have fun tho...
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  5. #5
    mitchno1's Avatar
    mitchno1 is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    new zealand
    Posts
    365

    Default

    in new zealand you could tow that weight behind a 4+4 ute and get 10ks to the litre,just a thought

  6. #6
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    So, what's the point? What are you trying to find out? With that kind of weight, you don't need to worry about pulling power. You want better MPG, you run between 1250-1300 RPM. In your case it's 62-64 mph. You want to drive "faster", you'll have to pay for it. That simple. Have fun tho...
    I just was seeing what the benifits were to driving slower compared to faster....or in this case, if things keep up this way, it will cost me $100 a week to go 4mph faster. Just was shocked at the idea was all. What can I say, i get bored doing the same damn thing each week LOL

  7. #7
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    What can I say, i get bored
    I hear you....
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  8. #8
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Not to mention i did plan on doing some mods such as Pittsburgh mufflers, and maybe a PDI ECM and figured with my run being the same, I could post some REAL WORLD numbers up as I go along.

  9. #9
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    i did plan on doing some mods such as Pittsburgh mufflers,
    Just for fun, ask any Pete dealer, how much is your muffler. I was thinking about the same thing, or Walker Noise-breakers, but it might be illegal emission wise.
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  10. #10
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    Just for fun, ask any Pete dealer, how much is your muffler. I was thinking about the same thing, or Walker Noise-breakers, but it might be illegal emission wise.
    I will do that tomorrow as the truck is going into the body shop to have the hood hinges replaced as they are bad (and the dealer is covering the total cost!)

    I know my truck is not CARB compliant, so it keeps me out of CA anyways, but that's fine with me as I don't like going there. The Pitt mufflers are $275 for my truck a piece... but their same muffler that is 10" shorter, but the same width is $189? Since I'm going to replace the top of the stacks anyways, I think I'll go with the shorter muffler and a longer top stack (tyes it will fit, I measured) so the tops will be basically free! And the are 50 states legal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    "Our new performance muffler solution for the 387

    This muffler uses a acoustic louver sound dampening

    This muffler is noticeably louder than our Quiet Performance muffler

    Up to 50 additional horsepower and improved response

    Lower exhaust gas temperatures

    Fast return on investment and easy fuel mileage gains

    Extra heavy duty construction. "
    Last edited by Steel Horse Cowboy; 03-06-2011 at 07:44 AM.

  11. #11
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    And the are 50 states legal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    They are legal noise wise, but i was talking about emissions. CAT ACERT suppose to have catalytic converters in it. I was quoted $2500 each(i've got 2) at KW dealer.
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  12. #12
    heavyhaulerss's Avatar
    heavyhaulerss is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    north alabama
    Posts
    1,189

    Default

    Why not just buy the donaldson 1000463 for $70.00 from ryder fleet products online? same as the p.p, one. straight thru design without the loud noise. http://www.ryderfleetproducts.com/ry...oductDetail.do
    Last edited by heavyhaulerss; 03-06-2011 at 03:10 PM.

  13. #13
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heavyhaulerss View Post
    Why not just buy the donaldson 1000463 for $70.00 from ryder fleet products online? same as the p.p, one. straight thru design without the loud noise. Ryder
    Because the DOnaldson one is only 9" wide, and mine are 11" wide. Unless I want to spend the money for someone to make a custom mounting set-up, I'm stuck with the 11" wide mufflers due to they mount to the truck AROUND the muffler, and the brackets would be too big for a 9" muffler.

  14. #14
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    They are legal noise wise, but i was talking about emissions. CAT ACERT suppose to have catalytic converters in it. I was quoted $2500 each(i've got 2) at KW dealer.
    I have no idea what you are talking about here....this is my 2nd ACERT CAT enigne and none of them had catalytic converters on them. And the Pittsburgh mufflers are 50 state legal EMISSIONS wise as well.

  15. #15
    heavyhaulerss's Avatar
    heavyhaulerss is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    north alabama
    Posts
    1,189

    Default

    S.H.C. I am like you on the m.p.g. I document the mileage at every stop & every fill up. I know the wind, hills, weight, e.t.c. have a lot to do with the different m.p.g we get, but I want to keep track to see too what is the optimum speed,rpm to get the best m.p.g. without lugging the engine or going ridiculously slow. I also keep tabs on my m.p.g. to help me determine if anything may be needed such as time for overhead run or cac leaking. these can affect m.p.g. I had a great tailwind pushing me down i-65 last week. got 7.0 mp.g. had to recalculate 3 times to make sure I added the numbers correct. some may think different on this, but I have always put 5 lbs more air in tires than posted on sidewall. all mine show 105 psi. I put in 110 psi. none of them stay at 110 in the cold weather, they all drop over time. keep on experimenting with your m.p.g. & any other truck related info. it will be of use to someone.

  16. #16
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    this is my 2nd ACERT CAT enigne and none of them had catalytic converters on them.
    That's why i've said ask your dealer. My truck is 2005, actually maid in may 2004, and engine february 2004. If it has no converters, why is such price? I'm trying to figer this thing out, let me know what did you find out....
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  17. #17
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    Because the DOnaldson one is only 9" wide, and mine are 11" wide.
    https://dynamic.donaldson.com/webc/W...210&item=21897
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  18. #18
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Still only 10" wide, plus it's 51" long...mine is 62.5"

  19. #19
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    That's why i've said ask your dealer. My truck is 2005, actually maid in may 2004, and engine february 2004. If it has no converters, why is such price? I'm trying to figer this thing out, let me know what did you find out....
    I asked them today and the parts guy thinks you are talking about the resonator under the cab. Some call it a convertor, and mine was $875 to replace. Mine has this resonator and then 2 mufflers on the stack, so I asked them how much louder it would be if I just bought spools and removed the mufflers, and he said maybe 20dbl? Since the convertor/resonator is the main sound deadner, so i may just go thay route too..... aparently most KW's that have the stack out the rear (like mine) such as a T600 or T2000 doesn't have mufflers, but pete's do....guess to be more costly LOL

  20. #20
    repete's Avatar
    repete is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,383

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    I just was seeing what the benifits were to driving slower compared to faster....or in this case, if things keep up this way, it will cost me $100 a week to go 4mph faster. Just was shocked at the idea was all. What can I say, i get bored doing the same damn thing each week LOL
    Are you sure it will ONLY cost $100 a week? That seems a little low to me after all thats only 25 gal. I'm just wondering. You get bored doing the same thing every WEEK? I do the same 3 roads every NIGHT! I watch the pot holes age!

  21. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0