Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Traded my truck

  1. #1
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default Traded my truck

    So I broke down (litterly) and bought a different truck....

    I got stuck in a nice 9 mile long stop-n-go thru Shreveport last week. After heating up the clutch a bit, it started slipping pretty badly. I made it to the peterbilt dealer back in Indy and was going to have it fixed when I noticed a nice 387 that caught my eye. It was the same truck i had looked at a month ago. Aparently it was in having a few things done to it for the same little dealership I had seen it at before. So I drove on over and talked to the salesman again. He cut me a good deal, and a trade-in on my rig so I said WTF and jumped on it.

    They gave me $10,000 trade (with the bad clutch) and sold me the truck for $25,000. I am also keeping all my brand new tires I just put on my FLD and they are swapping them over to the new truck for me.

    2006 Peterbilt 387 w/513k miles
    C13 475hp
    13spd
    3.36 rears
    New brakes all around
    full gauges ect ect.....

    I figured it should net me another 1mpg, which will save me about $150 a week on my run, and I get the write-off which my accountant said I really need!!!

    Anyways, i'm excited to get it on the road, but have a TON of paperwork to do so it should be ready for my run on monday.

    pete2.jpgpete4.jpgpete3.jpgpete1.jpg

  2. #2
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Well, congratulation! Sounds like a good deal for 15 grand. What makes you think about better fuel mileage? Did you look at ECM printout?
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  3. #3
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    Well, congratulation! Sounds like a good deal for 15 grand. What makes you think about better fuel mileage? Did you look at ECM printout?
    My old truck was a flat-top w/3.90 rears, this is a condo w/3.36's so it should net me at least 1 more mpg. I pull a 13' dry bulk tank and my old truck was 1500rpm at 62mph, this one is 1200 at 62mph..... just guessing.

  4. #4
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    just guessing.
    Yes, i kinda figured that out. Don't forget, you've got a real engine now, and it's all different ball game. Your specs are good for a "yellow" motor tho.....
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  5. #5
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    My old truck was a flat-top w/3.90 rears, this is a condo w/3.36's so it should net me at least 1 more mpg. I pull a 13' dry bulk tank and my old truck was 1500rpm at 62mph, this one is 1200 at 62mph..... just guessing.
    3.36 will seem sluggish to you after 3.90. The truck will drive faster but acceleration especially when loaded will suffer. I had that when changing from 3.73 to the current 3.42. Mine does 60 MPH at 1270 RPM and I think it's too fast. I want to put on RY023 Yokohama 295 tires... they spin 520 revs/mile. With those tires on, the truck will do 1,300 RPM at 60 MPH. That's more practical.

  6. #6
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tracer View Post
    3.36 will seem sluggish to you after 3.90. The truck will drive faster but acceleration especially when loaded will suffer. I had that when changing from 3.73 to the current 3.42. Mine does 60 MPH at 1270 RPM and I think it's too fast. I want to put on RY023 Yokohama 295 tires... they spin 520 revs/mile. With those tires on, the truck will do 1,300 RPM at 60 MPH. That's more practical.
    My IH had 3.23's so this won't be a big deal. And you have to remember, when I'm loaded it's only 4,500lbs of product, and the trailer onmly weighs 10,850lbs empty. I don't think I will have any problems with getting up to speed, and i am looking forward to seeing how much my MPG really is!!

    As for the speed I plan on going, I think I will start off at 65mph for my 1st trip and see where it puts me, then go from there. And since QC is switching to EOBR in May, i can use the extra hour each day

  7. #7
    Mackman's Avatar
    Mackman is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Concordville PA
    Posts
    3,699

    Default

    Nice truck. Wish you good luck with it.


    But it aint no rawhide
    Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

    "All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug



  8. #8
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mackman View Post
    Nice truck. Wish you good luck with it.


    But it aint no rawhide
    Thanks buddy.... I'm thinking about a year in it then it might be time to look at them Rawhides again

  9. #9
    no_worries is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,108

    Default

    Weren't you already getting close to 9 mpg? Another 1 mpg...I don't know. All the new EGR engines are temperamental (yes, Acert is EGR) and I know the C13 has had issues. Hopefully you'll luck out and get a good one like Solo did.

  10. #10
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by no_worries View Post
    Weren't you already getting close to 9 mpg? Another 1 mpg...I don't know. All the new EGR engines are temperamental (yes, Acert is EGR) and I know the C13 has had issues. Hopefully you'll luck out and get a good one like Solo did.
    Pittsburgh Power says they can change a CAT from being an Acert (EGR) to a regular engine, including a switch from dual turbos to a one big one. They say, it's 'expensive' but that you can gain a mile per gallon after the conversion.

  11. #11
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by no_worries View Post
    Weren't you already getting close to 9 mpg? Another 1 mpg...I don't know. All the new EGR engines are temperamental (yes, Acert is EGR) and I know the C13 has had issues. Hopefully you'll luck out and get a good one like Solo did.
    I was averaging about 8.5mpg if I didn't idle the truck (which I did all winter and it dropped to 7.5) but I think I will gain with this truck. Not just the gearing, but also the fact that it's a condo and will cut back on the top section of the trailer dragging in the wind. There is a guy who runs the same gig as i do but out to Norfolk, VA and he has a 2006 T-600 w/C13 and 3.55's. He drives at 70mph and is getting around 10mpg, so if I can net 9mpg I will be happy.

    As for the problems with the C13, can you please elaborate? I haven't heard anyting about that, but my C15 had a few problems, but were mainly electrical.

    And tracer, for the $13k Pittsburg want's to do the changeover, I'd rather buy a rebuilt 6NZ motor and swap it into the rig

  12. #12
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    And tracer, for the $13k Pittsburg want's to do the changeover, I'd rather buy a rebuilt 6NZ motor and swap it into the rig
    What was the last year they made non-Acert CATs? 2003? Mine is technically a 2004 but was assembled in December 2003 and it is an Acert

  13. #13
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tracer View Post
    What was the last year they made non-Acert CATs? 2003? Mine is technically a 2004 but was assembled in December 2003 and it is an Acert
    2003 was the last year for the non-acert motors, tho some 2004's have a NON-acert motor if they were assembled before 2004, but since your's is a 2004, I'm guessing IH must have ran out of 03 motors in stock early and started putting ACERTS in it.

    I'm not worried about the C-13 i am getting. I had them run a oil analysis and all came back good. Also, it was too cheap to pass up. If I can get 2yrs on it w/o a rebuild, I will be very happy, and I don't see it being a problem since I don't pull anything close to heavy.

  14. #14
    no_worries is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,108

    Default

    I agree, if you can pull 9-10 mpgs that's just the icing on the cake. I don't know specifics on the C13's. I've talked to several guys over the years that have cussed them to no end regarding component failures. Since I haven't run Cats in years, I didn't pay much attention. It seems like there were the usual issues with the new emissions gear and guys were having to do rebuilds fairly early. Of course, this is merely anecdotal and a small sample size, so who knows how indicative it really is. I know there's an attorney in TX trying to put together a class action against Cat. I thought it was just the C13's, but I think they've added the C15's to it. They're running ads in several industry rags.

    One thing about it, if you've got a clean bill of health now, it's not like you're going to be putting any strain on the motor. It will probably serve you just fine.

  15. #15
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tracer View Post
    Pittsburgh Power says they can change a CAT from being an Acert (EGR) to a regular engine, including a switch from dual turbos to a one big one. They say, it's 'expensive' but that you can gain a mile per gallon after the conversion.
    There might be a legality issue, since it will still be required to EPA standards.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
    he has a 2006 T-600 w/C13 and 3.55's. He drives at 70mph and is getting around 10mpg,
    He is full of it!
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  16. #16
    Heavy Duty is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post

    He is full of it!
    Very full of it.

  17. #17
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    No, he is not..... we run basically empty tanks for our entire run. They don't weight more than 15K lbs loaded and only 10,900 empty. My FLD flat-top with 3.90's got close to 9mpg in the summer...... but I will do my very 1st run next week and i will start a running total on my fuel, mpg and so. I'm just hoping to see the same if not better than my old truck

  18. #18
    Heavy Duty is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    414

    Default

    Fuel mileage figured the old fashion way, not off the computer.

  19. #19
    no_worries is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,108

    Default

    I hate to call BS because you never know, but the only time I ever consistently hit 9-10 mpg was as a company driver bobtailing in a Schneider pre-egr Century.

  20. #20
    Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
    Steel Horse Cowboy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy Duty View Post
    Fuel mileage figured the old fashion way, not off the computer.
    yes, at the pump

  21. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0