Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials | Spell Check

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Pre-EGR ISM vs. Cat C12

  1. #1
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default Pre-EGR ISM vs. Cat C12

    According to the local Kenworth salesman, the truck I'm looking for (t800SH) only ever came with the ISM/c12 or the EGR ISM/C13 in emissions years. I do not want an EGR/ACERT engine so I'm looking for the former two.

    Which is better and why? The salesman suggested the ISM, in 425 HP trim. He said it is a very good engine.

  2. #2
    Kranky's Avatar
    Kranky is offline Senior Board Member Kranky is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,108

    Default

    Why the prejudice against the C12 or C13 Cat?

    We've got a whole bunch of those in the fleet of dump trucks where I work and they kick *****, no major mechanical problems.

    Now, if you're gonna use the KW for OTR, you may want the C15.

    We've got C15's in our heavy haul tractors and those have also performed well.
    If you can't shift it smoothly, you shouldn't be driving it.

  3. #3
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default

    When I said "former" I meant C12/pre egr ISM.

    c15's aren't available in the t800SH. I wouldn't consider them either.

  4. #4
    Kranky's Avatar
    Kranky is offline Senior Board Member Kranky is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allan5oh View Post
    When I said "former" I meant C12/pre egr ISM.

    c15's aren't available in the t800SH. I wouldn't consider them either.
    Well, excuse me!
    If you can't shift it smoothly, you shouldn't be driving it.

  5. #5
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default

    Don't worry buddy you're excused!

    So you think the C12's are good motors? I know someone with one and he's very happy.

  6. #6
    Copperhead's Avatar
    Copperhead is offline Board Regular Copperhead is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kellogg, IA
    Posts
    374

    Default

    I would have no problem getting an EGR version Cummins. Just disable the EGR like I did on my ISX and gain about 1 mpg better fuel mileage, less wear and tear on the engine (oil samples look better), and engine runs w...a...y cooler, even on a warm day with the AC on and under a good pull, it never gets above 190-195F and the fan hardly cycles anymore... only if sitting in traffic or idleing. Recently pulled about 43,000 lb payload over the WV turnpike and then on hwy 460 into VA and the fan never had to cycle once pulling those hills with the AC on.

  7. #7
    ironeagle_2006 is offline Board Regular ironeagle_2006 has a checkered past and should take up chess.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    417

    Default

    The C12-13 cats are a VERY good motor can and will out pull a Cummins and will also out last them when it comes to time before an inframe. There is a decent sized company over 200 trucks and all he has is C-13's in his fleet some are approaching 1million miles in Bulk Service and still have not been inframed yet. Only issues he has were a couple did puke some injectors but that can happen to ANYONE. MPG's are in the mid 5 range loaded with tanks with the T-800's 6+ coming back empty.
    The orignal Ironeagle2006 Yes I am BACK.

  8. #8
    Maniac's Avatar
    Maniac is offline Senior Board Member Maniac is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    956

    Default

    The C-12 and C-13 are both very good engines, BUT they are considered small blocks, for OTR and maximum gross type of loads you are better off with the big blocks, C-15 or ISX Cummins.

    Remember you can always drive a big engine slowly and conservatively, rather than have to run a small engine at its limits.

    Personally I'd rather have the power and never use it than not have it when its needed, lots of real world testing has proven smaller is NOT always more economical.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In the back of your mind
    Posts
    421

    Default

    I've been driving a C12 for a year now, pulling flat, curtain van & tanker. IMHO;

    1. It's been dead reliable. I'm at almost 450K & as far as I know it had no probs under the previous drivers either. I add 1-2 gallons of oil on a 15K cycle.

    2. It feels & sounds like a CAT motor, which I like, it has the fly by wire throttle feel which I don't like.

    3. I have gotten 7 mpg once, with a light load in a curtain van. At 80k, with some hills I will get down into the low 6's, maybe even high 5's. With a flat (I'm usually d/h one way) I probably average 7. If you want I will check for more precise #'s. One thing I find interesting is that I am now on a dedicated tanker haul, running the exact route & loads as one of our other trucks. It has a pre-acert C15, 475 HP, 1750 torque. I pulled flat with it for a couple of days once & it just might be the best performing motor I've ever driven. On our route he uses the same fuel as I do. It kind of shoots a big-azz hole in the idea that you get better fuel mileage from less power. Of course getting our mechanic to look at anything like a potentially leaking air cooler is impossible. If the truck moves I will drive it.

    4. We've got 2 C13's, they out-pull me easily. So does almost everybody else. I think if you want a C12 you need a 13 speed and a rear end ratio that keeps you at 14-1500 RPM at your desired cruise speed. Under 1500 & you will down shift to pull a big overpass with a curtain van. Mine does not feel happy under 1300, I just can't keep my foot in it down to 1200 like with a big block. Of course a 1500 cruise will likely lower your mileage #'s too.

    I hope this helps- any questions, feel free to ask.
    The Big Engines
    In the Night-
    The Diesel on the Pass

    -Jack Kerouac, "Mexico City Blues"

  10. #10
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member tracer is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperhead View Post
    I would have no problem getting an EGR version Cummins. Just disable the EGR like I did on my ISX and gain about 1 mpg better fuel mileage, less wear and tear on the engine (oil samples look better), and engine runs w...a...y cooler, even on a warm day with the AC on and under a good pull, it never gets above 190-195F and the fan hardly cycles anymore... only if sitting in traffic or idleing. Recently pulled about 43,000 lb payload over the WV turnpike and then on hwy 460 into VA and the fan never had to cycle once pulling those hills with the AC on.
    I picked up a load of 44,700 lbs in Texas the other day and took it to Montreal, Quebec thru Louisianna, TN, OH and then NY. Did 60 MPH all the way and my Dyno-tuned CAT C15Acert (550 HP at 1,425 RPM, 2000 lb-ft torque) did 6.4 mpg. These are U.S. gallons measured at the pump (the computer showed 7.1).

    By the way, I threw out the ACERT muffler last summer and put a free flow one. Did emissions this year and was a bit worried. The funny thing is without ACERT my emissions were actually LOWER than last year when I had their muffler! Go figure.

  11. #11
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member tracer is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Copperhead View Post
    I would have no problem getting an EGR version Cummins. Just disable the EGR like I did on my ISX and gain about 1 mpg better fuel mileage, less wear and tear on the engine (oil samples look better), and engine runs w...a...y cooler, even on a warm day with the AC on and under a good pull, it never gets above 190-195F and the fan hardly cycles anymore... only if sitting in traffic or idleing. Recently pulled about 43,000 lb payload over the WV turnpike and then on hwy 460 into VA and the fan never had to cycle once pulling those hills with the AC on.
    You mean you disabled EGR in the ECM/computer settings? Maybe I need to do something like that on my CAT... I removed their proprietary muffler but didn't change anything in the ECM...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In the back of your mind
    Posts
    421

    Default

    I don't think your CAT has an EGR. ACERT is supposed to be a catalyst in the muffler, variable valve timing & really high turbo boost as an alternative to an egr. CAT spent hundreds of millions on it before conceding it was/is a failure.
    The Big Engines
    In the Night-
    The Diesel on the Pass

    -Jack Kerouac, "Mexico City Blues"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LightsChromeHorsepower View Post
    I don't think your CAT has an EGR. ACERT is supposed to be a catalyst in the muffler, variable valve timing & really high turbo boost as an alternative to an egr.
    Many have an EGR, CAT just tries their damnedest not to call it that. It takes exhaust after the DPF and uses an intake flap to force "scrubbed" exhaust into the engine pre-turbos.

    Attached Images
    Former Trailer Tech for Swift Transportation. Laid off as of 10-1-09

    Mercedes 1982 300D VNT
    OM617.952, GT2256V VNT turbo, Air-water intercooler

  14. #14
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member solo379 is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,611

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tracer View Post

    By the way, I threw out the ACERT muffler last summer and put a free flow one. Did emissions this year and was a bit worried. The funny thing is without ACERT my emissions were actually LOWER than last year when I had their muffler! Go figure.
    Did your muffler has a catalytic converter in it? Cause i have 2 mufflers at $2500 each, and sure not gonna buy new one at that price. So you are saying your test came out good, on all parameters?

    Hell, i might put a "Liberator" muffler, chipper than that....
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In the back of your mind
    Posts
    421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
    Many have an EGR, CAT just tries their damnedest not to call it that. It takes exhaust after the DPF and uses an intake flap to force "scrubbed" exhaust into the engine pre-turbos.

    Do you think they got enough plumbing on the side of that thing? Our mechanic claims CAT spent half a billion on ACERT and still couldn't get it to work.
    The Big Engines
    In the Night-
    The Diesel on the Pass

    -Jack Kerouac, "Mexico City Blues"

  16. #16
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member tracer is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    Did your muffler has a catalytic converter in it? Cause i have 2 mufflers at $2500 each, and sure not gonna buy new one at that price. So you are saying your test came out good, on all parameters?

    Hell, i might put a "Liberator" muffler, chipper than that....
    Yes, I had that expensive original muffler from CAT with a converter inside. I thought my emissions would go thru the roof ... I went to the local exhaust shop Texis Exhaust in Mississauga, Ontario, and they took off the CAT muffler with the converter and gave me a performance free-flow muffler. I love how the engine sounds now and emissions actually went down! The people who designed the converter must have been on drugs. I also think my fuel mileage has slightly improved, maybe by 1/10 of mpg.

    So, throw out the CAT mufflers and put on something that doesn't restrict the air flow. Your engine will thank you

  17. #17
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default

    ACERT does work, I just think they were having a hell of a time trying to meet the 2010 EPA regs.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allan5oh View Post
    ACERT does work, I just think they were having a hell of a time trying to meet the 2010 EPA regs.
    The EPA cut the NOx limit by 99%, everyone is having problems. 2010 emissions limits are already near zero, yet there are still the 2012 and 2016 emissions cuts to worry about....
    Former Trailer Tech for Swift Transportation. Laid off as of 10-1-09

    Mercedes 1982 300D VNT
    OM617.952, GT2256V VNT turbo, Air-water intercooler

  19. #19
    Copperhead's Avatar
    Copperhead is offline Board Regular Copperhead is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kellogg, IA
    Posts
    374

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tracer View Post
    You mean you disabled EGR in the ECM/computer settings? Maybe I need to do something like that on my CAT... I removed their proprietary muffler but didn't change anything in the ECM...
    Nope... just 30 seconds of my time, no tools, no parts, no hooking up a computer. Just a simple unplug of the lower plug on the EGR.

  20. This ad will disappear if you login

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0