Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Question about rear ends??

  1. #1
    b00m's Avatar
    b00m is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    241

    Default Question about rear ends??

    I found this 04 columbia, 13 speed,14.0 engine with 2.90 rears.What do you guys think about this set upfor power,fuel mileage,speed? Most of my friends haven't heard of gears this low and their views are different.Would like to hear from whom may know about this stuff.

  2. #2
    Scottt is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Low??

    That would be high geared. Should fly across Nebraska

  3. #3
    Fredog's Avatar
    Fredog is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    3,684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b00m View Post
    I found this 04 columbia, 13 speed,14.0 engine with 2.90 rears.What do you guys think about this set upfor power,fuel mileage,speed? Most of my friends haven't heard of gears this low and their views are different.Would like to hear from whom may know about this stuff.
    A guy called Rutherfords show last week, he bought one of those and hates it..he said it gets lousy mileage and runs like crap.
    kevin said with ultra low pro 22.5 and 60 mph it would do okay

  4. #4
    b00m's Avatar
    b00m is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fredog View Post
    A guy called Rutherfords show last week, he bought one of those and hates it..he said it gets lousy mileage and runs like crap.
    kevin said with ultra low pro 22.5 and 60 mph it would do okay
    Okay, 60mph wont cut it for me.I need to run at least 65 to 75 and still get decent mileage.I should mention that it has a 14.0 detroit.Just talked to one of my mechanics and said it was a good set up.But i still want to hear more from others.

    TY

  5. #5
    tracer's Avatar
    tracer is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b00m View Post
    Okay, 60mph wont cut it for me.I need to run at least 65 to 75 and still get decent mileage.I should mention that it has a 14.0 detroit.Just talked to one of my mechanics and said it was a good set up.But i still want to hear more from others.

    TY
    This little formula might help you decide:

    RPM at 60 MPH = Axle ratio X Tranny ratio X Tires revs

    I guess this truck has a direct drive tranny, so the "Tranny ratio" (top gear) will be 1. Regular 22.5 tires do usually 495 revs/mi; while tall rubber (24.5) do 473 revs/mi. To find out the RPM at 65 or 70 you put in all the numbers in this formula and then divide the result by 60 and multiply by whatever speed you plan to run at.

    Example: tires revs=495, direct drive (1 ratio), axle ratio-2.90. The engine RPM at 60 MPH will be: 2.90 X 1 X 495 = 1435. The engine RPM at 65 MPH will be: 1435 / 60 X 65 = 1555 RPM

    If you play with various tire types, you can find which setup will produce the RPM that Detroit recommends for cruising on the highway.

  6. #6
    sidman82's Avatar
    sidman82 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Long Island,NY & GA
    Posts
    528

    Default

    I have 3.55's and I do 70 at 1500 rpm. 24.5 low pro. I would get higher if I ever changed them.

    The faster I go the better fuel mileage I get.
    I can use power tools, and I'll think about doing your dry cleaning if the rates are good.

  7. #7
    sgreer78 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    90

    Default

    With the specs you listed I'm sure it's an old Swift truck. They have 2.93 rears with a direct 13sp. That tranny and rear end is near the exact same as an overdrive 13sp and 3.55's.
    That transmission was originally a RTLC-16609E, once converted it's a RTLO-16613B, Top hole is now .85

    That would put you at 1400rpms at 65 and 1600rpms at about 75.
    Last edited by sgreer78; 03-31-2009 at 06:30 PM.

  8. #8
    b00m's Avatar
    b00m is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sgreer78 View Post
    With the specs you listed I'm sure it's an old Swift truck. They have 2.93 rears with a direct 13sp. That tranny and rear end is near the exact same as an overdrive 13sp and 3.55's.
    That transmission was originally a RTLC-16609E, once converted it's a RTLO-16613B, Top hole is now .85

    That would put you at 1400rpms at 65 and 1600rpms at about 75.

    Yes.You are correct.It is a swift truck. Right now, my t 2000 with a 10 sp,3.55 rears runs me at 1500 rpm @ 65.Over 1500 at higher speeds.The problem is that it really needs a rebuild and that would cost me over 10k.And once you put money into it,It never ends.According to my numbers from last year,i had quite some big numbers on repairs.That's why i decided to go with another truck,less expensive, since the economy is the way it is.A little protection from both sides.

    But yeah, if any of you guys had any experience with this type of set up dont hesitate to post.

    TY

  9. #9
    sgreer78 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b00m View Post
    Yes.You are correct.It is a swift truck. Right now, my t 2000 with a 10 sp,3.55 rears runs me at 1500 rpm @ 65.Over 1500 at higher speeds.The problem is that it really needs a rebuild and that would cost me over 10k.And once you put money into it,It never ends.According to my numbers from last year,i had quite some big numbers on repairs.That's why i decided to go with another truck,less expensive, since the economy is the way it is.A little protection from both sides.

    But yeah, if any of you guys had any experience with this type of set up dont hesitate to post.

    TY
    I own an old Swift truck. One of the blue ones, just like the white ones except it has power windows. I had very bad luck with it at first, but a new engine, clutch, and rear main seal later, I'm in business. I get an average of around 6.8mpg pulling intermodal through the hills of Missouri. Heavy loads, 45,000 plus

  10. #10
    b00m's Avatar
    b00m is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sgreer78 View Post
    I own an old Swift truck. One of the blue ones, just like the white ones except it has power windows. I had very bad luck with it at first, but a new engine, clutch, and rear main seal later, I'm in business. I get an average of around 6.8mpg pulling intermodal through the hills of Missouri. Heavy loads, 45,000 plus

    New engine??? Man that's crazy!Let me know what issues you had with that detroit engine.I only dorve a cummings and had no problems at all but im new to detroit.Also 6.8 mpg is excellent on those trucks.

  11. #11
    sgreer78 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    90

    Default

    The engine had massive blow-by due to poor, if not non-existent maintenance. So it was covered under warranty. When they did the engine work they screwed up the rear main seal, so then that was replaced. After that, I was going home to find the clutch slipping like crazy bob tailing. I took it back to find out the clutch was soaked in oil. It wasn't like that when I had taken it in there. So after some intense "reasoning" with them, the clutch was replaced as well. Since then I've had no real trouble out of it. However my EGR valve needs to be replaced, but with how slow things are, I can't really afford to just throw 1200.00 at it.

  12. #12
    nightrider76 is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    23

    Default

    I'd stay out of the mountains with those gears. Be splitting all day. Wont be able to skip gears as easily also.

  13. #13
    Graymist is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b00m View Post
    Yes.You are correct.It is a swift truck. Right now, my t 2000 with a 10 sp,3.55 rears runs me at 1500 rpm @ 65.Over 1500 at higher speeds.The problem is that it really needs a rebuild and that would cost me over 10k.And once you put money into it,It never ends.According to my numbers from last year,i had quite some big numbers on repairs.That's why i decided to go with another truck,less expensive, since the economy is the way it is.A little protection from both sides.

    But yeah, if any of you guys had any experience with this type of set up dont hesitate to post.

    TY
    A disclaimer....I'm not an o/o, but a company driver.

    Upon reading your post, I became a bit curious about your logic, and I don't mean it in any disrespectful way.

    On the one hand, you state that your existing truck needs a rebuilt engine at an expense of approx 10k, something which you're not keen on doing : yet, on the other hand, you're perfectly willing to spend even more money on yet another used truck, which has probably been run ragged by its previous owners, along with questionable maintenance. What is the guarantee that you won't have to spend even more money on this other truck that you're looking at ? It's not as if you're getting yourself a brand new truck. At least with the truck that you currently own, you're quite familiar with its functioning.

    Don't you think that a known devil is better than an unknown one, especially in this economy ?

  14. #14
    Snowman7's Avatar
    Snowman7 is offline Water Board Administrator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    the Buckeye
    Posts
    1,705

    Default

    While I am certainly no expert I hear alot of truckdrivers prefer "Eaton rearends". As a matter of fact some of them just love Eaton rearends.

  15. #15
    Jumbo's Avatar
    Jumbo is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Northern Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,102

    Default

    Roehl runs a setup close to that. 10 speed direct with 2.64 rears. And that is why they,

    R oll
    O ver
    E very
    H ill
    L ast
    Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.

  16. #16
    amandaholder is offline BANNED Rookie
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default oops

    thought this was a question about girls, never mind

  17. #17
    Snowman7's Avatar
    Snowman7 is offline Water Board Administrator Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    the Buckeye
    Posts
    1,705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman7 View Post
    While I am certainly no expert I hear alot of truckdrivers prefer "Eaton rearends". As a matter of fact some of them just love Eaton rearends.
    Its a joke. Eaton rearends, get it? No?

  18. #18
    GTR SILVER's Avatar
    GTR SILVER is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightrider76 View Post
    I'd stay out of the mountains with those gears. Be splitting all day. Wont be able to skip gears as easily also.
    what would you suggest....????
    i thought the 13 & 18..were made for situations like mountains..heavy loads...etc.. YouTube - Shifting Jackass mountain
    www.townhall.com

    I know God will not give me anything I can't handle. I just wish that He didn't trust me so much.
    Mother Teresa

    "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." G.K. CHESTERTON

    "Qui non intelligit aut discat aut taceat"
    Who does not understand should either learn, or be silent.
    The Mark Levin Show

  19. #19
    sgreer78 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightrider76 View Post
    I'd stay out of the mountains with those gears. Be splitting all day. Wont be able to skip gears as easily also.
    How do you figure? It's almost dead on to an OD13sp and 3.55's. People see the 2.93's and **** themselves. They fail to realize the fact the the tranny is direct drive...

  20. #20
    b00m's Avatar
    b00m is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Graymist View Post
    A disclaimer....I'm not an o/o, but a company driver.

    Upon reading your post, I became a bit curious about your logic, and I don't mean it in any disrespectful way.

    On the one hand, you state that your existing truck needs a rebuilt engine at an expense of approx 10k, something which you're not keen on doing : yet, on the other hand, you're perfectly willing to spend even more money on yet another used truck, which has probably been run ragged by its previous owners, along with questionable maintenance. What is the guarantee that you won't have to spend even more money on this other truck that you're looking at ? It's not as if you're getting yourself a brand new truck. At least with the truck that you currently own, you're quite familiar with its functioning.

    Don't you think that a known devil is better than an unknown one, especially in this economy ?
    All right,
    No problem at all and no offense taken

    The rebuilt is around 10k or more.Radiator , air to air and all the hoses are around 2k or more, ac work would be around 1k, body work on the hood 5-6k, and things can go on and on.All these would cost me money out of pocket which i don have .This truck ate me last year around 24k in repairs.Small stuff here and there,headaches with lost loads etc.I'm just sick and tired of really dealing with it anymore. The truck that i'm looking at is around 25-35k financed for a period of no more than 30-40 months.I'm looking at a truck in the high 400's to low 500's miles.By the time the truck gets to 800-900 miles it would be paid off and i will get rid of it by buying a better one.I came to find out that there is no reason to keep a truck over a million miles, like i had this one.Stuff that starts breaking down, big or small is just too much and can add to the headaches.Trust me i have been there this past year with it and decided that it was enough.The amount of repairs almost knocked me down.

    But anyways, right now i would consider a volvo too.It is a central refrigerated, cummings engine,10 sp, 355 rears.I guess these would be pretty nice too.I really like volvo but i'm kind of afraid of the electronics part.Oh well, let me know what you guys think.

  21. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0