Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: looking to buy a truck.. deciding between kenworth t600 and t800

  1. #1
    kanodogg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default looking to buy a truck.. deciding between kenworth t600 and t800

    Hello all, I'm on the market right now for possibly a T600 or maybe T800, just wanted to get an idea on what differences these two models have. As far as basic design goes, the shape looks somewhat similar, is the T600 more fuel efficient?

    The T800 I'm looking at has 317,000 miles, C-15 motor and 62" sleeper, dealer asking 46,900 (it's a 2005).

    The T600 has 330,000 miles, c-15 motor and 72" sleeper, dealer asking 54,000 and it is also a 2005.

    On the surface to me the T800 seems like more of a deal than the T600, just wanted to get the opinion of some fellow truckers that may have had experience with either model.

    Truck I'm replacing is a 2002 KW t2000 which was totalled after being hit by a drunk driver headon. Wound up being allright though, since insurance is paying me 29,000 for that truck which had 800,000 miles on it, can't really complain.


    Any help appreciated, Thanks.

  2. #2
    Rev.Vassago's Avatar
    Rev.Vassago is offline Guest Board Icon
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The other side of the coin
    Posts
    9,411

    Default

    The difference is in the nose, and (I believe) how far the steer axle is set forward. I believe the T600 has a longer nose than the T800. I've driven both, and I personally prefer the T800.

    I wouldn't buy anything with a Cat in it myself, though. I'm still predicting that the price of parts will shoot through the roof.

  3. #3
    floored Guest

    Default

    Personally I hate both trucks, T800s are very uncomfortable (for me) to drive for long periods of time (leg room issues). I ran team with a T600 for a while, only real complaint there was due to the size of the truck I felt cramped in overall space (I came out of a Columbia prior). Have you driven these trucks at all to be sure you would like them? Its a big change from the openness of a t2000

  4. #4
    heavyhaulerss's Avatar
    heavyhaulerss is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    north alabama
    Posts
    1,189

    Default

    In these times you should be able to get a better deal. imo a det would get u beter mpg.

  5. #5
    Sparks280zt is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    56

    Default

    I always love how people complain about there not being much room in the KWs (other than the football helmet t2000) I have driver both, they are identical other than the t600 axle is a bit further out and the hood is different. I think a t800 looks better and it is more of a tough looking work truck I think. Anyays, I rather have a KW with NO room in it than a Freighshaker with all the room in the world, I prefer quality!
    Sparks Industrial Services Inc.

  6. #6
    kanodogg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default

    thanks for the replies guys.. MPG is not so much of an issue, the t2000 that i had before also had a c15-475 cat and fuel economy was good enough. nothing against detroit or cummins though everyone i know that has trucks w/ those engines are ready to bury them at 700k+ whereas that cat that i had was solid even at about 800k. know loads of people with columbia/centurys and those things are always in the shop.

    i think i'm gonna go with the t800, i run regional so space is not much of an issue, again, thanks for the replies.

  7. #7
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    the c15 you currently own is totally different from the c15 in those trucks.

  8. #8
    kanodogg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default

    allan5oh, could you please elaborate, how is the c15 in that t2000 different from the t800 one? For better or worse? Thanks.

  9. #9
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    It's the model year, not the make and model of the truck, that makes the difference.

    Starting in 2003 were the "EPA" engines. Cat went with ACERT. Your engine now has a single turbo, the ACERTS ha ve two turbos, called sequential turbos(some people mistakenly call it twin turbo).

    Fuel mileage with these new engines is not as good as the old engines. Plus going from your aerodynamic t2000 to a less aerodynamic t600 and an even less aerodynamic t800 will hurt things.

    It's very unfortunate that your truck is totaled, because now you're under the gun. Please take your time looking for trucks.

    One thing I would recommend, and that could eliminate either or even both trucks, is a full ECM printout. This printout will have the lifetime fuel mileage on it(although it's not always 100% accurate) it will give you an idea.

  10. #10
    kanodogg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default

    allan5oh, could you please elaborate, how is the c15 in that t2000 different from the t800 one? For better or worse? Thanks.

  11. #11
    Sparks280zt is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    56

    Default

    I just looked at an 04 w900 with a c15, its a single turbo. And I also looked at an 05 and its a single turbo. So I dont think all of them after 2003 are twin turbos.
    Sparks Industrial Services Inc.

  12. #12
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,247

    Default

    I have a friend who owns a T800. I have a T600. About the only noticeable difference is the hood. I believe that I get a little better fuel mileage on my T600 than he does on his T800. That may or may not have anything to do with the aerodynamics. It could have as much to do with gearing or the driver than anything else. The T600 was the first aerodynamic truck. I think it is more a matter of personal preference. I would go with which ever one that I could get the best deal.

  13. #13
    solo379's Avatar
    solo379 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparks280zt View Post
    And I also looked at an 05 and its a single turbo.
    Better look again.
    Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

  14. #14
    kanodogg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default

    thanks for the tips! got the dealer to get me an ECM printout so i can see what mpg that trucks been doing and then if i like what i see after that, the dealer gonna get me a dyno done. quite a contrast from back in 2004 when i bought the t2000, they weren't willing to do that stuff unless i paid for it. that t800 was run on southwest freight, with a name like that i'm hoping those guys ran only western states.

  15. #15
    Rev.Vassago's Avatar
    Rev.Vassago is offline Guest Board Icon
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The other side of the coin
    Posts
    9,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanodogg View Post
    that t800 was run on southwest freight, with a name like that i'm hoping those guys ran only western states.
    I just ran the name in Google, and came up with a Southwest Freight Inc, which has terminals in Texas and New Orleans.

  16. #16
    heavyhaulerss's Avatar
    heavyhaulerss is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    north alabama
    Posts
    1,189

    Default

    I rather have a KW with NO room in it than a Freighshaker with all the room in the world, I prefer quality!





    yeah. so would I. so would most. but quality usually cost more. & less quallity does not mean more break down. take cars, or even houses. most of us did not buy top quality, but I bet most of us have stories of great value &a good deal on both items. Well you know I'M a lil biased. lol. that comes from buying a ole walmart cabover for $15,000 10 years ago & still going strong. 1.1 mil. I think the main thing is take your time deciding. if you get that gut feeling of regret after you buy, then you probably should of waited.


    my beleif is the folks responding here are honest. however.. we all know that we all will have different experience from our trucks. just like our first cars. i'll swear by my chevy cause it gave me years of minimum problems & when i bought a ford, had nothing but problems. you'll have others having just the opposite position. sice the holidays are near.. the big EMPHASIS is dont be in a hurry to buy. the thrill of a new truck wears off long before the payments do. wish you the best of luck.

  17. #17
    kanodogg is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago View Post
    I just ran the name in Google, and came up with a Southwest Freight Inc, which has terminals in Texas and New Orleans.

    that's what i thought at first too, but turns out it is actually this southwest.. www.swtrucking.com looks like they only have a terminal in watsonville, ca, but it also says that they bought out some company in phoenix so maybe they have one in az too. from the looks of things it doesn't look like a western states operation.

  18. #18
    Jackrabbit379's Avatar
    Jackrabbit379 is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wichita Falls,Tx
    Posts
    7,100

    Default

    The 600, and 800 are the slope nose KWs right? 900, or W9 is the regular? (Like the one that Jerry Reed drove )

  19. #19
    slodsm is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tyler Texas
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
    Better look again.

    My 07 T600 I had while I drove for Melton was a single turbo C15. I pretripped it every morning, think I would have noticed an extra turbo hanging off the side.

  20. #20
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackrabbit379 View Post
    The 600, and 800 are the slope nose KWs right? 900, or W9 is the regular? (Like the one that Jerry Reed drove )

    That is correct, Jackrabbit. I love those Bandit movies.

  21. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0