Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34

Thread: CARB is at it again....

  1. #21
    Walking Eagle's Avatar
    Walking Eagle is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my own little world, that rides right behind the cab.
    Posts
    610

    Default

    The shippers of the containers just aren't going to pay the extra tax or the extra freight rate after it lands the y will move up or down the coast (Mexico) to land their stuff. Think they are shooting themselfs in the foot.

  2. #22
    fdmax's Avatar
    fdmax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Huntington Beach, Ca
    Posts
    97

    Default

    The Ports have a $100 fee for long haul trucks, called the day-pass. Thats on top of the other fee's.

  3. #23
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fdmax View Post
    The Ports have a $100 fee for long haul trucks, called the day-pass. Thats on top of the other fee's.


    Trucking companies can easily afford to pay an extra $100 to haul one of those containers. After all, those are HIGH DOLLAR loads. It is time for truckers to say enough is enough. Stop paying these ridiculous taxes. They may call it a fee, but it is still a tax. If I have to pay a tax to haul a container out of one of the California ports they will need to find another way to move their container. It should not matter whether the truck is a long haul truck or not. Long haul trucks are not going to pollute any more than a local truck.

  4. #24
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    All the trucking companies should simply "pass on" these costs to the customer. That's what the big telephone companies did when the FCC came out with a bunch of fees for them. Here's a site explaining:

    http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/phonebills/samplePhonebill.html

  5. #25
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,247

    Default

    Unfortunately, Allan, there are too many carriers who will take those loads for a cheap rate and still absorb the fee. There is no need for otr carriers to be subjected to paying an additional fee that the local trucks are exempted. I don't see why otr should be treated any differently than the local trucks.

  6. #26
    fdmax's Avatar
    fdmax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Huntington Beach, Ca
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Your Right GMAN, some carrier's do take cheap freight. The Day-Pass is paid by the shipper.
    But it's a must for O/O's to negotiate a rate that does include a profit, because if you take a load without negotiating a fair rate, we left money that will keep us in business.....
    This can never be said enough..........Tell the Shipper or Broker, what your rate is.
    I have Haz-Mat, TWIC, SeaLink, SCAC, E-Modal, UCR, KY, AR, NY, NM, OR, CA, IFTA, IRP IRS, BOE, BOC3, 2290, Truck, Fuel, Insurance, Driver(me), accessories....ect, ect, ect.
    Tell them what your rate is, "negotiate" a fair price.
    And if they don't pay for what it's all worth, I'll say no, thanks.

  7. #27
    eplurubus is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    102

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDiesel View Post
    Don't worry LightsChromePickleParkStalker......

    Now that's funny!

  8. #28
    rigidsporty's Avatar
    rigidsporty is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ask and ye shall receive.
    Posts
    695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fdmax View Post
    Beginning October 1, 2008, pre-1989 trucks will be banned. The program progressively bans all trucks that don't meet 2007 emission standards by 2012.
    So much for my plan to save up and buy an older truck.
    You can kiss the lower part of the back of the canister that is my body!

    http://www.sassnet.com

  9. #29
    fdmax's Avatar
    fdmax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Huntington Beach, Ca
    Posts
    97

    Default

    I have a 2003 Pete with a C-15 475HP.
    And I like it just fine.
    And it's paid off.

    Retrofiting an emission is possible,
    one contact is IronManParts.com
    http://www.ironmanparts.com/iro_index.cfm?id=svcs
    I mistakenly wrote the wrong web page in my other post (ironman.com <<< wrong).
    Ironmanparts.com say they have a diesel particulate filter they could put in and service too.

    They say on the web page that the internal guts need to be professionally cleaned on a regular basis to maintain performance.
    And during the cleaning process, heat and high pressure is used to burn and blast off, any baked-on diesel soot and particulate matter to reopen the small air passages in the diesel particulate filter.
    This is their # (800) 889-1882 , never hurts to ask what it would cost.and how it really works.

    You can read about the regulations at www.epa.gov
    and at www.arb.ca.gov

    It's all really intense reading, but basically these two agencies are holding hands, EPA has the money CARB wants some of that money.

    I just want to keep on truck'in. I'm barely broken in, and so is my truck.
    Last edited by fdmax; 11-05-2008 at 07:21 PM.

  10. #30
    rgordon212's Avatar
    rgordon212 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    96

    Default

    I can see China and other countries sending their cargo ships to Mexico or over to Houston instead of Cali ports just to save the $$$$ fees on the millions and millons of containers they ship....

    I personally wont haul into cali for less than $5 miles, because all the friehgt I ever find comming out is usually under $1mile???

    Also note that the "2007 Emissions" regulations that they are putting into place are ONLY for trucks plated in California. If your truck is plated elsewhere you will be fine.
    1999 Freightshaker FLD120.... my 1st baby
    2005 Pete Low and Mean
    2005 9400i Cheap and making money

  11. #31
    fdmax's Avatar
    fdmax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Huntington Beach, Ca
    Posts
    97

    Default

    “Truck and Bus Regulation”

    PROPOSED REGULATION
    Title 13, CCR, section 2025

    The "2007 Emissions" for Small Fleets – Small fleets can delay compliance until 2013 for one vehicle, 2014 for the next, and 2016 for the third if the second is 2010 model year engine.

    http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2008/truckbus08/appa1.pdf

    Page 8
    Exemption for Low-Use Vehicles and Three Day Pass Vehicles.
    (A) Vehicles that drive less than 1,000 miles or operate less than 100 hours
    per year are exempt from the requirement of the regulation but must
    continue to report and keep records.
    (B) The mileage accrued during emergency operations need not be counted in
    determining whether a vehicle meets the definition of a NOx mileage
    exempt vehicle.
    (C) Vehicles that exceed the 1,000 mile limit must comply with the regulation.

    *(D) Each year, a fleet may allow one vehicle within that fleet to travel in
    California for one single three day period per year without complying with
    regulation.

  12. #32
    fdmax's Avatar
    fdmax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Huntington Beach, Ca
    Posts
    97

    Default

    I've only hauled a few HVCC a year for 2006 and 2007, none 2008, and i think, the year 2007, the day pass started, not really sure, but, prior to Oct 1 2008 the day pass was paid by the shipper. Now there this at the Ports Begining Oct. 1, 2008.

    DRAYAGE SERVICES

    CONCESSION AGREEMENT

    FOR ACCESS TO THE
    PORT OF LOS ANGELES

    http://www.portoflosangeles.org/CAAP...eement_New.pdf
    Page 9

    2.1 Concession Fees
    2.1.1 (A one time Concession fee of $2500) will be assessed to the Concessionaire.
    The Concession fee shall be collected at the time of submission of the
    Concession Application.
    2.1.2 For each Permitted Truck, (an annual fee of $100) will be assessed to the
    Concessionaire (Annual Truck Fees). The Annual Truck Fees will be collected (i)
    within 30 days of the Effective Date of this Concession for Permitted Trucks
    registered as of the Effective Date, (ii) within 30 days of registration of additional
    Permitted Trucks into the Drayage Truck Registry, and (iii) on the annual
    anniversary date that each Permitted Truck was registered in the Drayage Truck
    Registry (unless the Permitted Truck was registered prior to October 1, 2008 in
    which case its anniversary date shall be October 1). Trucks for which an annual
    fee has been paid for a particular year may be registered under multiple Port of
    Los Angeles Concessions without the payment of any additional annual fee of
    that year.

    Landline said long haul trucks can enter the ports 12 times annually, ($100 a pop) until they roll out a permanent day pass plan in Jan 2009.

    The commission said they would hold a public hearing on all the port plans, but any resolution will take until Jan. 22, 2010.
    Since they did'nt listen to the truckers before,then why would they resolve anything.
    OOIDA sent me a survey, they're going to try something, or at least look busy.
    The Federal Maritime is investigating, prolly to see if they can squeeze some heavy money out of the ports.
    Seems like everywhere is a freakin race to socialism and Big Government.

  13. #33
    ELGAUL's Avatar
    ELGAUL is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    HOUSTON,TX
    Posts
    55

    Thumbs down

    you caught that too bigdiesel,sounds like that peice of s@#t works for the other side..

  14. #34
    fdmax's Avatar
    fdmax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Huntington Beach, Ca
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Don't feel like it's only you, its being seen all over.
    A lot of carriers ie O/O are in a frenzy now cause theres no freight volumes to keep rates up, and the limited freight there is they're just trying to keep their doors open.
    They know theres dozens of trucks for every load.
    They'll just make a call and give it to the next carrier.

  15. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0