Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 65

Thread: Quality Carriers threatening to match logs to satelite transponders

  1. #1
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default Quality Carriers threatening to match logs to satelite transponders

    Welcome, Big Brother!

  2. #2
    partssman's Avatar
    partssman is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Thomasville,N.C.(Occupied) CSA
    Posts
    59

    Default

    And DOT being able to acess your qual com as you drive thry the scales ain't far off either I'd bet.

    Hope they have plenty of drivers....they gonna need 'em if they start that

  3. #3
    Red Clay Rambler's Avatar
    Red Clay Rambler is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    361

    Default

    I assumed any company that uses Qualcomm/transponders was already doing that.

  4. #4
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Clay Rambler View Post
    I assumed any company that uses Qualcomm/transponders was already doing that.
    The last time I had Qualcomm they weren't. A friend of mine used to drive for JB and he was always having trouble with the Qualcomm and logs, so maybe some are.

    I stop and go, take breaks, nap, use the internet...it's going to be a pain if I've got to record every little thing I do and it's going to mess with the way I like to drive.

  5. #5
    partssman's Avatar
    partssman is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Thomasville,N.C.(Occupied) CSA
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Most I reckon like a comapny I worked for used the qwual com just to keep up with equipment and communicate with drivers.....or so they said.

    Couse I know of 2 companies right off that would have to hire a wad of drivers and buy more equipmnet if they started running legal, bet you do too.

  6. #6
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by partssman View Post
    Most I reckon like a comapny I worked for used the qwual com just to keep up with equipment and communicate with drivers.....or so they said.

    Couse I know of 2 companies right off that would have to hire a wad of drivers and buy more equipmnet if they started running legal, bet you do too.
    I probably don't do 2,000 miles a week, yet I like to relax when I want to relax and drive when I want to drive. I could spend a lot of time just drawing little lines if I have to record everything. They've taken away split logging, nobody sleeps for 10 hours but some of us need to sleep a little during the day!

  7. #7
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    A company is essentially required to use every tool under its power to ensure you're logging legally, otherwise they're setting themselves up for a huge lawsuit.

    Could you just see it now? Huge fatal accident, involving a truck. Turns out the truck may have been running over hours.

    Lawyer to company representative :

    "So you guys use the qualcomm system, we know it logs where the truck is, do you use this system to match the logbooks of the driver, to ensure compliance?"

    "no"

    case closed.... multi-million dollar settlement....

  8. #8
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allan5oh View Post
    A company is essentially required to use every tool under its power to ensure you're logging legally, otherwise they're setting themselves up for a huge lawsuit.

    Could you just see it now? Huge fatal accident, involving a truck. Turns out the truck may have been running over hours.

    Lawyer to company representative :

    "So you guys use the qualcomm system, we know it logs where the truck is, do you use this system to match the logbooks of the driver, to ensure compliance?"

    "no"

    case closed.... multi-million dollar settlement....
    How common is this, then?

    Also, we don't use qualcommon. But they put these transponders on the trailers.

    Seriously, we all know logbook rules are rough and they'll never know when a driver is actually tired and when he's actually alert like the driver himself can judge. Arguments can be made in favor of logbook rules, but they contradict the way I like to run and what I'm comfortable with. It's one thing to make us do logs that generally reflect what we've done, it's another thing to computer and satelite check them minute by minute. I hate it, but like everyone else, I'll do what I have to do.

  9. #9
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Unfortunately it doesn't matter when you're tired, when you're not tired, when you can run, or when you cannot run.

    What matters is, if your logbook is legal or not. Have you broken federal laws?

  10. #10
    Red Clay Rambler's Avatar
    Red Clay Rambler is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    361

    Default

    I don't think lowrange is interested in cheating, my guess is he doesn't want to fool with having to draw a line for every 15-minute catnap, etc.

  11. #11
    Orangetxguy's Avatar
    Orangetxguy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Clay Rambler View Post
    I assumed any company that uses Qualcomm/transponders was already doing that.


    The last time I had Qualcomm they weren't. A friend of mine used to drive for JB and he was always having trouble with the Qualcomm and logs, so maybe some are.

    I stop and go, take breaks, nap, use the internet...it's going to be a pain if I've got to record every little thing I do and it's going to mess with the way I like to drive.
    I've been at Miller 18 months. They have matched logs against the QC and fuel receipts the entire time.
    Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! Star Trek2009

  12. #12
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Clay Rambler View Post
    I don't think lowrange is interested in cheating, my guess is he doesn't want to fool with having to draw a line for every 15-minute catnap, etc.
    Thank you.

  13. #13
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Just for the record, I was not accusing anyone of fudging their logbooks.

  14. #14
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,247

    Default

    There are a number of things a carrier can do with qualcomm. They can check your mpg, average speed and even set your maximum speed. They can give real time locations within minutes. I don't personally care for qualcomm, but when you work for a carrier who does use them and they want to match their records with yours, it is best to work with the system.

  15. #15
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allan5oh View Post
    Just for the record, I was not accusing anyone of fudging their logbooks.
    No, no, don't apologize for accusing me or anyone of fudging the logbook. If we can't tell the truth anonymously on a message board, then...

    I look at it like this: which is most important for doing a logbook, a watch or a calculator? If your answer is 'a calculator', you fudge your logbook. But, that doesn't mean you run 3300+ miles per week or that you run 800 miles in a day. What it does mean is that you don't want to spend 10 hours just sitting around all day because you got to your consignee at midnight and began unloading at 7 am.

  16. #16
    Walking Eagle's Avatar
    Walking Eagle is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my own little world, that rides right behind the cab.
    Posts
    610

    Default

    Also even if your carrier doesn't compair logs with Qualcom DOT can if they come in to do an audit. They just pick drivers at random and have their past XXX months of Qualcom reading printed out (believe Qualcom "hits" the truck for location every 15 minutes automaticaly, more if dispatcher is watching you, and then you have to explain how you got from Baltimore to Pittsburg in 30 minutes

  17. #17
    lowrange's Avatar
    lowrange is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    continental 48
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walking Eagle View Post
    Also even if your carrier doesn't compair logs with Qualcom DOT can if they come in to do an audit. They just pick drivers at random and have their past XXX months of Qualcom reading printed out (believe Qualcom "hits" the truck for location every 15 minutes automaticaly, more if dispatcher is watching you, and then you have to explain how you got from Baltimore to Pittsburg in 30 minutes
    Have you ever, ever heard of anyone getting a ticket that way? Even right now, I'm catching up on the internet: this board, a sports board, email... You know, I really don't draw all that many lines...

  18. #18
    BIG JEEP on 44's is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    pod# 110 -Shared with a high risk in a red jumper.
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    The DOT can't use the QC against you in court...the qc is not always accurate ...it can lose track of the vehicles location . Unless you're werner an the qc is the log the dot has to go by the drivers log not qc

  19. #19
    Walking Eagle's Avatar
    Walking Eagle is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my own little world, that rides right behind the cab.
    Posts
    610

    Default

    Just ask CR England, 1999 they paid $100,000 something fine for letting drivers run illigal logs after DOT checked against QualCom. 2001 CCC $97,000, Oh and you could ask Landstar, couple of years ago the got a hefty one over the trucks that run QualCom, why they got so anal over logs the last few years. They may not go after the driver but they go after the company, and you know that is gona put you right at the top (favorite) spot with dispatch. Right.

  20. #20
    rgordon212's Avatar
    rgordon212 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Log it as you do it..... there is NO reason for you to go over the 14hr rule, and 11hrs is plenty of time to drive during the day. If you think otherwise and you use the excuse "i dont make any money if I dont push it the extra" then you need to find another job because your at the wrong place making the wrong amount of money

    Just my .02 and i'm sure there will be plenty of you who disagree with me, but the point is to be safe and make it there, even if it's late, than not at all..... work smarter and not harder.
    1999 Freightshaker FLD120.... my 1st baby
    2005 Pete Low and Mean
    2005 9400i Cheap and making money

  21. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0