Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials | Spell Check

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: I-80 Tolling Gunned down

  1. #1
    csramsey640 is offline Member csramsey640 is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    128

    Default I-80 Tolling Gunned down

    I live in Central PA, and just heard last night on the news that the deal has fell through. They are now moving forward with leasing out of the PA pike, which explaines why they are re-building all the service plazas, major interchanges, ie New Stanton, cutting the mountain in Somerset, etc

  2. #2
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,108

    Default

    I am glad to hear that I-80 will not be tolled. I find it interesting that Pennsylvania is spending so much money to upgrade the old toll road only to lease it out to a foreign entity. I wonder how much money these politicians are getting under the table for this little anti American venture. I think any of these politicians who sell our infrastructure to a foreign entity are guilty of treason and should be thrown out of office and prosecuted. They mismanage public funds and then try to cover up their folly by selling off the infrastructure. I read an article about the Pennsylvania toll money. They are using the funds for things other than repair and building of roads. They are using fuel taxes for things other than building and maintaining roadways. It is a blatant misuse of public funds. In the private sector we would consider it fraud. You collect money for one purpose but use it for something else. Pennsylvania is not alone in their mismanagement of public funds. There are many others. When these states start talking about putting in toll roads or tolling existing roadways you can bet something has happened to the funds they have already collected and they are trying to cover it up. According to a study that was done not long ago, approximately 30% of collected fuel taxes are spent for things other than road building and maintenance. And as a footnote, it is my understanding that most of these so called toll road leases have a guaranteed profit built into them so that the lessee is guaranteed to make a minimum profit and some states are moving forward with plans to restrict traffic, especially trucks, to force them onto these toll roads. Perhaps when some of these politicians start talking about adding toll roads or leasing out our infrastructure we should start talking about recalling their election.

  3. #3
    Orange Andy is offline Member Orange Andy is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley Calif.
    Posts
    137

    Default

    And these are the exact things that revolutions are based upon. Lying elected officials, who we elect to work for us, and steal our money to pay for programs we not only dont want, but dont need.

    In California our fearless Governor Arnold is calling an emergency fiscal meeting monday the 17th to address the possible 14 Billion dollar state budget shortfall. And get this........they are un-decided as to whether they will cut spending.......or raise taxes!!! GIVE ME A BREAK!!...We are facing a crisis because we are facing recession, and a tax increase is an option? Insanity.

    Revolutions are becoming a more logical solution day by day.

  4. #4
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,108

    Default

    Things were great in California until the mid 70's when they got the idea of increasing property taxes at an unbelievable rate. Since then, they haven't met a tax they didn't like. For those who are imposing these taxes it doesn't matter. When they want more money they just tap the public tax system. Need more money, raise taxes. They don't seem to understand that what they really need to do is reduce the size of government. :shock:

  5. #5
    Orange Andy is offline Member Orange Andy is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley Calif.
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMAN
    Need more money, raise taxes. They don't seem to understand that what they really need to do is reduce the size of government. :shock:
    Amen, nor do they realize that being anti-industry is not helping the required revenue & tax dollars that must support this Gorilla size government they have created.

    I guarantee you they could learn a few things about efficiency from truckers. :wink:

  6. #6
    person is offline Board Regular person is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    258

    Default

    [quote]
    Quote Originally Posted by GMAN
    Things were great in California until the mid 70's when they got the idea of increasing property taxes at an unbelievable rate.
    Proposition 13, officially titled the "People's Initiative to Limit Property Taxation," was a ballot initiative to amend the constitution of the state of California. The initiative was enacted by the voters of California on June 6, 1978. It would eventually be upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992). Proposition 13 is embodied in Article 13A of the California Constitution.

    The most significant portion of the act is the first paragraph, which capped real estate taxes:

    “ SECTION 1. (a) The maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property shall not exceed One percent (1%) of the full cash value of such property. The one percent (1%) tax to be collected by the counties and apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties.
    The Howard-Jarvis tax initiative was the best thing that ever happened to CA. It can be circumvented somewhat by county things that they add to your tax bill via voters consent. That's small potatoes compared to where things may have gone w/out this proposition being passed.
    I would like to add that the property tax of 1% STAYS at the purchase price, regardless if your property has gone up in value since it was bought. The tax for that property doesn't go up until it changes hands. (Or maybe gets re-appraised for another mortgage by the same owner. I don't remember about that second mortgage part.)

  7. #7
    ncnewbie is offline Member ncnewbie is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    162

    Default

    CA will have to continue raising taxes to pay all the state, county and local workers retiring and moving to nearby states with lower or no taxes. Not to mention teachers. 80% of your pay for the rest of your life for doing your job is one sweet deal. Not to mention almost free medical on top of that. Did the public have any say in the creation of the retirement plans by and for these public employees? Not much I'll wager.

    Once taxes, doesn't matter from where, hit the politicians' coffers, they consider them to be in their personal "wallets", to be spent as they and their lobbyists see fit. imo.......

  8. #8
    Orange Andy is offline Member Orange Andy is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley Calif.
    Posts
    137

    Default

    It used to be the government jobs were a place to go earn a humble wage, but in return have total job security. Now it is job security of the highest order plus retirement packages of the highest order.

    And when business cannot compete with them, they go overseas and set up shop, and get barbequed by the press / liberals for doing that.

    It's actually great comedy

  9. This ad will disappear if you login

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0