User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-14-2007, 01:25 AM
Mackman's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concordville PA
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default question about a tag on a tri axle.

This is a ? about tags on a tri axle. dump. In pa you can only get a tag for 73280lbs. We live real close to DE NJ. DE is 73280 but Nj is 80000lbs on a 4 axle truck. So with the truck being taged in PA can we on the apportion tag if we could get jersey at 80000lbs. So if we get loaded in jersey and dump in jersey we can haul 80000lbs. Cuz right now it says 73280. By the way the weight rateing on the door of the truck is 80000lbs so thats not a problem. Me and my dad where takin about it.

Do any of you understand my question.

The apportion tag reads like this now
PA-73280
NJ-73280
DE-73280

We want it to read like this
PA-73280
NJ-80000
De-73280
__________________
Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

"All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2007, 01:30 AM
marylandkw's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I went thru rounds with the MVA about this one. As far as Maryland is concerned you can only have one weight on your cab card. Mine is like this

MD-73280
PA-73280
NJ-73280
DE-73280
DC-73280
VA-73280

But in DC and Va I can only gross 54280(federal bridge law) and MD I can only go 70000.

And of course if you are over your RGVW (registered) you are illegal regardless of your chassis GVW.
__________________
Paranoia is nothing more than the pathological habit of paying close attention.
All ideas in this communication are sole property of the voices in my head. (C) 2006, "The Voices" (TM)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2007, 01:35 AM
Mackman's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concordville PA
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marylandkw
I went thru rounds with the MVA about this one. As far as Maryland is concerned you can only have one weight on your cab card. Mine is like this

MD-73280
PA-73280
NJ-73280
DE-73280
DC-73280
VA-73280

But in DC and Va I can only gross 54280(federal bridge law) and MD I can only go 70000.

And of course if you are over your RGVW (registered) you are illegal regardless of your chassis GVW.
Well how can you be taged for 73280 in MD when a tri-axle can only haul 70000. So could we pay the higher price of the tag and get all 3 states tagged for 80000???
__________________
Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

"All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2007, 01:40 AM
marylandkw's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mackman
Well how can you be taged for 73280 in MD when a tri-axle can only haul 70000.
Because MD wants all of my money for apportioned Tags I guess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mackman
So could we pay the higher price of the tag and get all 3 states tagged for 80000???
Yes, but you would be limited too whatever the weight limit for the state you are in.
__________________
Paranoia is nothing more than the pathological habit of paying close attention.
All ideas in this communication are sole property of the voices in my head. (C) 2006, "The Voices" (TM)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2007, 01:43 AM
Mackman's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concordville PA
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Thanks Maryland well it wouldnt be worth the xtra cost for us. So we will stick with 73280.
__________________
Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

"All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2007, 01:58 AM
Mackman's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concordville PA
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Maryland got this off of the PA dmv website. You sure MD dont do it like this.



List the weight to be carried in each state in which apportioned
registration is desired.
For each jurisdiction, the gross weight for single truck or the combined
gross weight for combination units must be shown for each power unit
apportioned.
An applicant may elect to register a vehicle at a different gross vehicle
weight in member jurisdictions. Example: if the applicant desires to
register in Iowa at 80,000 pounds and only 74,000 pounds in Texas, the
applicant must show 80,000 pounds for Iowa and 74,000 for Texas. the
applicant will pay the Iowa fees based on 80,000 pounds and the TExas
fees based on 74,000 pounds. The cab card issued with indicate the
applicant has paid fees for a combined weight of 80m,000 pounds in
Iowa and 74,000 in Texas.
__________________
Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

"All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2007, 09:37 PM
Blind Driver's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

My truck is tagged for 80k in Indiana. I can't haul that much due to the truck not having enough axles. But I can haul 80k in KY, but not on the interstate :roll: . Only on secondary roads. In Indiana I can haul only 68k legally. Even then, I'd still be over on my drives :roll:
__________________
"Professional stake killer with ability to operate heavy equipment"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2007, 12:14 AM
marylandkw's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Mackman, I got stuck with only being allowed to do the same in all the states. I went rounds with them at the MVA about it. But who knows, I might have gotten a different answer at a different mva.
__________________
Paranoia is nothing more than the pathological habit of paying close attention.
All ideas in this communication are sole property of the voices in my head. (C) 2006, "The Voices" (TM)
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.