User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-30-2007, 04:50 AM
ISMAR132's Avatar
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default stoughton or utility

in load boards if it doesn't specifeid 53 ft it usualy means 48ft traILERS

SO MOST LOADS WOULD BE FOR 48FT TRAILERS,
RIGHT!

I know a 53ft vented gives me more of a chance at a load but i never hade a 53ft loaded all the way to the door there is always a good 7ft left empty.

I feel a 48ft is good enough to make money
but i will like some imput on this options.

1996 stoughton 48x52 @ $ 9400.00 dry van

1998 utility 53x102 @ $ 8900.00 vented

both in good condition, it seems the 53 ft would be a better choice but why is the stoughton more expensive?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-30-2007, 04:52 AM
ISMAR132's Avatar
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

stoughton is 48x102 dry van
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2007, 05:23 AM
person's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

That 98 Utility should weigh 11,500. Light is good. No doubt it is air ride. Already vented is a small plus.

Is the Stoughton air ride? It is 2 years older, $500 more and shorter. I don't know much about it, but I know there are plenty of Utilitys out there doing the job.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-30-2007, 05:41 AM
ISMAR132's Avatar
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

their both air ride
aren't there plenty of loads for 48 footers or is it best to go with the 53x102
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-30-2007, 06:30 AM
allan5oh's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

go with the 53.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:41 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default Re: stoughton or utility

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISMAR132
in load boards if it doesn't specifeid 53 ft it usualy means 48ft traILERS

SO MOST LOADS WOULD BE FOR 48FT TRAILERS,
RIGHT!


A 48' should work on most loads, but some shippers think that they need a 53' whether they really do or not. I have known of some who start with a 48' and then trade up, but given a choice I would go with a 53'.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:11 PM
person's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Don't make the mistake of not having the trailer you want to buy looked at by a mech or by some one who truly knows his stuff. Even if, or especially if it is at a dealer, unless you can get the dealer to sign a seriouly worded warranty. I would have it looked at by someone outside the dealership even with a warranty. An ounce of prevention.........
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:14 AM
Bandit102's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I run reefers, not vans. I have two 48's and one 53. Legally, you're not supposed to load 34k past the 48 foot line anyway. I prefer the 48's for reefers but don't know about vans. I've never had much trouble loading my 48's but you can ALWAYS load a 53 and NEVER have to pass on a load because you don't have enough trailer. I keep my 48's because that's what my best driver and I like - personally.
__________________
1999 FL Classic, N14+ 525 hp, RTLO16-9-13A
1997 Van's Aircraft RV-6, IO-360
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.