Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials | Spell Check

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Opinions Please

  1. #1
    Scottt is offline Board Regular Scottt is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    346

    Default Opinions Please

    I have narrowed my choices on a truck down to 2. Both are about the same money and I am going to pay cash.

    2001 Peterbilt 387
    Cat C-15
    455hp
    3.55 rear gear
    10 speed
    app. 650,000 miles

    2003 Volvo 610
    VED 12
    450hp
    358 rear gear
    10 speed
    app 385,000 miles

    Pulling 53' van from midweat to Az and Southern Ca and back.

    Feedback??

    Thanks

  2. #2
    BanditsCousin's Avatar
    BanditsCousin is offline Senior Board Member BanditsCousin is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    Prices?
    Mud, sweat, and gears

  3. #3
    Sammonman is offline Rookie Sammonman is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Volvo.
    The miles and the cost of the rebuild.
    The fuel milage would be the kicker but I believe that would be the Volvoo too.

  4. #4
    Scottt is offline Board Regular Scottt is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    346

    Default

    Pete $35,000
    Volvo $32,000

  5. #5
    tweety bird is offline Senior Board Member tweety bird is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    535

    Default

    I've owned 2 Volvos and driven 4.

    The lower miles alone are a good basis for the choice- I mean, barring unknown problems etc. But that could go either way.

    There are guys for whom a Pete is the ultimate truck- and that's why the prices are higher for them. I like the Volvos, though. It's a tool. Period. I mean, you want to go out and get a fancy chicken ride, be my guest. I'd rather put money in the bank!

    I think the Volvos are good looking trucks.

  6. #6
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,108

    Default

    The Volvo has fewer miles and should go longer before an overhaul. On the other hand, the Volvo engine may cause a problem with parts availability and finding a mechanic who will work on it. You will likely need to go to a dealer for engine work. The Peterbilt will probably need an overhaul sooner, but could go over a million miles before any major work, depending on how the truck was maintained. I have driven a 387 with a CAT and 10 speed transmission. I got over 7 mpg. I was shocked to say the least. I drove it for a week while my Peterbilt was in the shop. I liked it. The Volvo should be lighter in weight, but may not have as much room as the Pete. If I felt that the Pete has been well maintained, I would opt for it over the Volvo. One reason would be the easy available of parts and mechanics who can work on it, should I have a problem. Personally, I prefer CAT engines.

  7. #7
    Scottt is offline Board Regular Scottt is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    346

    Default

    Gman that is something I was thinking about too

    The Pete has a 72" standup sleeper and the Volvo has a midroof. When you are looking at them it doesn't look that small but after you get home and think about the difference it's really alot.

  8. #8
    LOAD IT is offline Senior Board Member LOAD IT is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    713

    Default

    That Pete is going to have a higher resale value and in 3-4 years that Volvo is only going to be worth about half of what you paid for it. I had a 660 with VED about 425 horses, good truck.

  9. This ad will disappear if you login

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0