Funny, I knew of a guy over there that was their biggest fleet owner. Fella out of Texas, had about 75 trucks, all Petes. One day the paper on all his trucks got called in by Schneider Finance. Seemed he wasn't making his payments. Trucks were shut down at OC's all over the country. He didn't even bother bringing his drivers home. Maybe he "retired." Rumor was his wife had money and that's how he got his start. Can't vouch for the truth to that one though.I know of a man who had 75 trucks on over there...He just retired a multi-millionaire
I thought about leasing trucks on with Schneider. But after running with them myself for almost a year, the numbers just didn't add up. These were my numbers from that year.
Rev. $1.08/mile all miles
Fuel .39 2.52/gal 6.4 mpg
Ins .04
Maint .04
Misc .03 (cell phone, scales, etc.)
This was for a team so the truck actually runs a little more efficient than a solo would, less DH, fixed cost spread out more, etc. Plus, no workers' comp. Brand new truck so my maintenance is lower than someone running an older rig.
That was on 175,000 miles. So, in the interest of simplicity, let's say a solo could do that at .42/mile. My FICA liability would be a little over .03/mile. That gives us driver costs of .45/mile assuming no benefits. That leaves me with .13/mile to cover a truck payment and profit. That works out to $1895/month. So I'd have two options. Go with new equipment and have no profit...not a great business plan. Or go with older equipment. I'd have a lower monthly payment and insurance but higher maintenance costs. I'd also have to worry about when I was going to get hit by a major mechanical issue which could suck up that difference in payments at one shot.
For me, the margins just weren't there to justify the gamble. For those that make it work, I applaud them. However, I think there are a lot more who think they're making it work than there actually are.




Reply With Quote
