Anyone else remember when that used to be the litmus test for new legislation? Senators would step up to the microphone and say that their new bill was "good for the middle class because...", or "would strengthen the middle class by...", or "would result in a savings of x number of $ for the middle class", etc, etc. That used to be THE test for whether a piece of legislation was worthwhile or crap.
Today they talk about "good for business" or "good for wall street". May I translate that for you? What they mean is "good for the filthy rich". That's the way we do things now, if it's good for the rich, it's good for you (or at least you should acquire a taste for getting bent-over).
lol I swear I never thought I'd sound like and old fart but the way we used to do it was better. The middle class buys things! The middle class drives the economy! Our middle class was the envy of the world before we started looking like a third world nation.
Thanks for listening. I feel better now.




Reply With Quote




