I have been, on occasion, known to "over-analyze" certain things, so I can hear your point. With that said, I don't believe that's the case here.
While I agree that fluency in English is of primary importance, especially in the US, can you honestly believe that we'll continue to wield the power we've had historically when we've begun to do things like "leasing" major roadways, signing NAFTA agreements, and borrowing from other countries to the point that they could send our economy into a tailspin by simply calling in the debt??
I'm not saying any of the candidates are "saviors". I simply believe that his point was that we, as a nation, would be wise to wake up to the globalization of the marketplace...and in preparation, become able and willing to converse/conduct business in other languages. That's just plain good business sense.
Is it hypocritical to offer a warning to others as well as to yourself? If a person identifies a problem, should he wait until he's a perfect model of the solution before he sounds the warning?
Since we're in America, and ALL of our street signs/warnings/directions are printed in English, and since that is the accepted spoken/written/read language here, it would only make sense that someone who's operating an 80,000 pound vehicle would be required to be fluent in this language. No dispute there.




Reply With Quote



