Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: Yet another poor choice for president

  1. #21
    gordoUSA is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    san antonio, TX
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Again, we really have no choices. It will business as usual in Washington, no matter who is elected.
    One thing I will give to Obama, at least he has good organizational skills, he has run his campaign in a efficient manner. Both McCain and Clinton have gone broke and over spent their millions of dollars in contributions. Not very good management.
    Experience? What has Clinton done? And being the wife of a philandering husband and first lady really doesn’t count. McCain? Helped sponsor a bill that gives amnesty to illegal immigrants? And his AZ campaign guy just got indicted in federal court for mail fraud, conspiracy, and a few other things, along with 2 other guys, facing 50 years in prison, although unrelated to his campaign, doesn’t show good judgment.
    ……………….
    I really don’t know why anyone would want to be President after Bush/Cheney and the mess they will leave behind.

  2. #22
    greg3564 is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Leander, TX
    Posts
    1,268

    Default

    Again, we really have no choices. It will business as usual in Washington, no matter who is elected.
    I will agree 100%.

    One thing I will give to Obama, at least he has good organizational skills, he has run his campaign in a efficient manner. Both McCain and Clinton have gone broke and over spent their millions of dollars in contributions. Not very good management.
    Running or managing a campaign is hardly a requisite for President.

    Experience? What has Clinton done? And being the wife of a philandering husband and first lady really doesn’t count.
    No fan of Clinton here. Can't stand her. But she has held office as a U.S. Senator for 8 years. She has also been around the political machine most of her adult life. Again, I'm no fan and hell would freeze over before I voted for her.

    McCain? Helped sponsor a bill that gives amnesty to illegal immigrants?
    Which is why conservatives, like myself, don't like him. I'm still not sure I will vote for him in November. If he wasn't 71 I might have considered it. At this point maybe I'll vote for Nader as a protest vote. If Bloomberg enters maybe I'll vote for him. We'll see.

    And his AZ campaign guy just got indicted in federal court for mail fraud, conspiracy, and a few other things, along with 2 other guys, facing 50 years in prison, although unrelated to his campaign, doesn’t show good judgment.
    How can he possibly babysit every campaign official? There must be hundreds across the country that run campaigns for him. I don't think you can fault him for bad judgement for something he had no control over.

    I really don’t know why anyone would want to be President after Bush/Cheney and the mess they will leave behind.
    It's all about padding your resume and boosting your ego. Not to mention the millions they make writing books and making speeches when they leave office.
    Check out the new 2008 Microsoft Streets and Trips! Sweet!


  3. #23
    Karnajj is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Useless
    Yeah, Nader is just what this country needs!!

    Well, the good news is that it takes money to campaign, and Nader doesn't have much going for him!!


    GObama'08!!
    Useless, I am hoping and praying fervently that your GoBama08 tag is a joke. I mean, we don't agree on everything. The fact is usually we agree on most things so I can't believe that you are a true Obama supporter.
    I'm willing to die to protect my Right to Bear Arms.

    Are you willing to die to take them away from me?

  4. #24
    gordoUSA is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    san antonio, TX
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Quote:
    And his AZ campaign guy just got indicted in federal court for mail fraud, conspiracy, and a few other things, along with 2 other guys, facing 50 years in prison, although unrelated to his campaign, doesn’t show good judgment.


    How can he possibly babysit every campaign official? There must be hundreds across the country that run campaigns for him. I don't think you can fault him for bad judgement for something he had no control over.
    .......
    Must have been "faulty intelligence" or "fuzzy math."
    ...........

  5. #25
    Orangetxguy's Avatar
    Orangetxguy is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheepdancer
    Corporations SHOULDNT PAY ANY TAX AS A WHOLE. Corporations are owned by the stockholders and investors and they already pay taxes. Taxing the corporations AND THE INVESTORS (owners) is double taxation.
    If that were the "total" truth to the matter Sheep, I would agree. However, stockholders and investor's only pay capital gains taxes on earnings from their stock investments, after selling those stocks. They may also pay taxes on dividend pay outs, if they receive them. Most "dedicated" investors do not receive dividend pay outs, they re-invest them instead, there by delaying taxes. Of course....the taxes shareholders and investors pay, are significantly lowered, if the shareholder or investor is in the "major" classification. Once in that classification, there are "loopholes" which congress has left open for them(in US tax code), so that they do not have to pay quite so much(if any at all) in capital gains tax.

    Now....just wondering here...why shouldn't ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Dupont..or Dow..or Caterpillar, just to name a few, pay taxes on their profits? None of them have a dividend that would re-distribute their annual profits to the investors and shareholders in full, as is also true of most corporations.

    After you explain why those companies shouldn't pay taxes, then explain why companies such as BayerAG, BP PLC, RoyalDutchShell PLC, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., Solvay, or BHP Billiton, all foreign operating companies, should not pay taxes (on the portion of their profits which originate in the US, which are significant), to our country?

    While most all of the companies I listed here pay their "working class" employees well...and their "upper management" even better...none of them are "truck rate" friendly.

    Just wondering here.
    Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! Star Trek2009

  6. #26
    Windwalker's Avatar
    Windwalker is offline Board Icon
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Been there and gone...
    Posts
    6,286

    Default

    Now, I feel hurt. Not even one mention of ME running for President of the United States. I'm REALLY HURT. Thanks guys. Thanks a bunch. :sad: :!:
    Destroy the cities...
    and they will rebuild them.
    Destroy the farms...
    and grass will grow in the streets of the cities.

    Destroy the economy of the blue-collar worker...
    and grass will grow in the executive offices.

    The bill has come due.
    ( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)


  7. #27
    Syncrosonix's Avatar
    Syncrosonix is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    in bed with your woman
    Posts
    1,916

    Default

    i still remember ross perot's televised speech on how he was going to do things. he brought out all kinds of graphs with a bunch of junk written. i just remember him saying, "no! we're going to do things MAH way!"

    even though i was in the fourth grade at the time, i started laughing. it was mostly because of his accent and the way he said it.
    :P

  8. #28
    gordoUSA is offline Board Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    san antonio, TX
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Windwalker:

    I'll vote for you!

  9. #29
    Fredog's Avatar
    Fredog is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    3,684

    Default

    WINDWALKER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

  10. #30
    Syncrosonix's Avatar
    Syncrosonix is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    in bed with your woman
    Posts
    1,916

    Default

    my vote is going to walter.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=4_XP8FK5460

  11. #31
    Fredog's Avatar
    Fredog is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    3,684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syncrosonix
    my vote is going to walter.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=4_XP8FK5460

    sorry Windwalker, I'm changing my vote

  12. #32
    DaveP's Avatar
    DaveP is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    "The Shoals", Alabama
    Posts
    668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Useless
    Yeah, Nader is just what this country needs!!

    Well, the good news is that it takes money to campaign, and Nader doesn't have much going for him!!


    GO-bama08!!
    You just cost him a few thousand Auburn fan votes in Alabama.

  13. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0