A North American Union????

[Cluggy619]

I found this rant on Craigslist.com. Seems interesting, and would effect all industries, including trucking......

North American Union to Replace USA?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-364698027@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-07-01, 11:02PM CDT


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965


President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

What do ya'll think?

[Colin]

Quite a web site. Slant is good, no? :?

[Fozzy]

AGAIN!!!

[Fozzy]

ooops.. double post

[Cluggy619]

AGAIN!!!

Yep, your right....time to break out my tin-foil hat again. :P

[Jackrabbit379]

[Cluggy619]

Found this post as well........

These words were spoken 100 years ago, the question is, "how do
we feel about it today?".......mg

The year is 1907, one hundred years ago.....

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who
comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to
us,
he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for
it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed,
or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's
becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an
American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who
says he is an American, but something else also,
isn't an American at all.
We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for
but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have
room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American
people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Every American citizen needs to read this!

Today, that is our problem.....too many flags.

[Cluggy619]

And here is the problem with Mexican Illegals:

Try to reason with an illegal alien,,, cant be done, they are stupid--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-365221891@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-07-02, 4:24PM CDT




> Trying to reason with an Illegal Mexican, This is
> good! Below is a good example of a discussion with a
> master of circular logic. Don't be logical, don't
> respect the truth or your adversary, just say what you
> think, make a new case when the previous case gets too
> difficult to defend.
>
> Downtown Houston, Texas, May 1, 2006. Jim Moore was
> reporting for KHOU-TV, a Houston TV station working an
> interview with an illegal immigrant. The following is
> a transcript of that interview:
>
> Jim: Juan, I see that you and thousands of other
> protesters are marching in the streets to demonstrate
> for your cause. Exactly what is your cause and what do
> you expect to accomplish by this protest?
>
> Juan: We want our rights We will show you how
> powerful we are. We will bring Houston to its knees!
>
> Jim: What rights?
>
> Juan: Our right to live here...legally. Our right to
> get all the benefits you get
>
> Jim: When did you come to the United States?
>
> Juan: Six years ago. I crossed over theborder at night
> with seven other friends.
>
> Jim: Why did you come?
>
> Juan: For work. I can earn as much in a month as I
> could in a year in Mexico. Besides, I get free health
> care, our Mexican children can go to school free, if I
> lose my job I will get welfare, and someday I will
> have the Social Security. Nothing like that in Mexico!
>
> Jim: Did you feel badly about breaking our immigration
> laws when you came?
>
> Juan: No! Why should I feel bad? I have a right to be
> here. I have a right to amnesty. I paid lots of money
> for my Social Security and Green Cards.
>
> Jim: How did you acquire those documents?
>
> Juan: From a guy in Dallas He charged me a lot of
> money too.
>
> Jim: Did you know that those documents were forged?
>
> Juan: It is of no matter. I have a right to be here
> and work.
>
> Jim: What is the "right" you speak of?
>
> Juan: The right of all Aliens. It is found in your
> Constitution. Read it!
>
> Jim: I have read it, but I do not remember it saying
> anything about rights for Aliens.
>
> Juan: It is in that part where it says that all men
> have Alien rights, like the right to pursue happiness.
> I wasn't happy in Mexico, so I came here.
>
> Jim: I think you are referring to the Declaration of
> Independence and that document speaks to unalienable
> rights ... Not Alien rights.
>
> Juan: Whatever.
>
> Jim: Since you are demanding to become an American
> citizen, why then are you carrying a Mexican Flag?
>
> Juan: Because I am Mexican.
>
> Jim: But you said you want to be given amnesty ... To
> become a US citizen.
>
> Juan: No This is not what we want. This is our
> country, a part of Mexico that you Gringos stole from
> us. We want it returned to its rightful owner.
>
> Jim: Juan, you are standing in Texas. After wining the
> war with Mexico, Texas became a Republic, and later
> Texans voted to join the USA. It was not stolen from
> Mexico.
>
> Juan: That is a Gringo lie. Texas was stolen. So was
> California, New Mexico and Arizona. It is just like
> all the other stuff you Gringos steal, like oil and
> babies. You are a country of thieves. You steal
> babies.
>
> Jim: Babies? You think we steal babies?
>
> Juan: Sure. Like from Korea and Vietnam and China I
> see them all over the place. You let all these
> foreigners in, but try to keep the Mexicans out. How
> is this fair?
>
> Jim: So, you really don't want to become an American
> citizen then.
>
> Juan: I just want my rights! Everyone has a right to
> live, work, and speak their native language wherever
> and whenever they please. That's another thing we
> demand. All signs and official documents should be in
> Spanish. Teachers must teach in Spanish. Soon, more
> people here in Houston will speak Spanish than
> English. It is our right!
>
> Jim: If I were to cross over the border into Mexico
> without proper documentation, what rights would I have
> there?
>
> Juan: None. You would probably go to jail, but that's
> different.
>
> Jim: How is it different? You said everyone has the
> right to live wherever they please.
>
> Juan: You Gringos are a bunch of land grabbing
> thieves. Now you want Mexico too? Mexico has its
> rights. You Gringos have no rights in Mexico. Why
> would you want to go there anyway? There is no free
> medical service,schools, or welfare there for
> foreigners such as you. You cannot even own land in my
> country. Stay in the country of your birth.
>
> Jim: I can see that there is no way that we can agree
> on this issue. Thank you for your comments.
>
> Juan: Viva Mexico!
>
> Curtis Collier
> President, U.S. Border Watch Texas Director of the
> Firecoalition
> U.S. Border Watch
> 6046 F.M. 2920 suite 401
> Spring,Tx 77379
> 1-800-759-0948

[yoopr]

You're becoming quite the computer Geek there Jack :P

[golfhobo]

Found this post as well........

These words were spoken 100 years ago, the question is, "how do
we feel about it today?".......mg

The year is 1907, one hundred years ago.....

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who
comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to
us,
he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for
it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed,
or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's
becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an
American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who
says he is an American, but something else also,
isn't an American at all.
We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for
but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have
room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American
people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Every American citizen needs to read this!

Today, that is our problem.....too many flags.

I don't argue one bit! But, I can't help noticing that over 100 years since the founding of our country, and only a few years before SOME in Congress insisted that we "brand" our currency with "in God we Trust," and 50 years before "Under God" was added to our Pledge of Allegiance, a GREAT American President spoke of ONE loyalty to the American People, and never ONCE mentioned religion or GOD!

Yes, I agree, that EVERY American citizen should read THESE words, and consider them as they were spoken and intended. And I especially recommend them to Mr. Bush.

[trux]

I don't know if I'd characterize the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as "left of center". If you check their membership list, while you'll find names such as Bill Clinton and John Kerry, you'll also find names such as GHW Bush, Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Dick Cheney, Alan Greenspan and Donald Rumsfeld.

Membership list:

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall1.htm

And a little background wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council...eign_Relations

I would actually characterize them as being right of center, given their membership of big business types.

And as far as conspiracy theories go, do I believe rich, powerful people might want to set the table to more efficiently harvest whatever wealth is available to be harvested from us, the less than rich and powerful?

Perish the thought.

Luckily, it's been pointed out to me that only tin-foil hat wearing nut-jobs would ever dare to believe that the rich and powerful might want to become even more rich and powerful. And that they might do so without telling us (the great unwashed) about their desires and plans. And that they might recruit politicians to advance their plans.

How could I have been so crass as to doubt the good will of these exemplary people?

Never again will I doubt the kindness and caring of the Kenneth Lay's and Dennis Kozlowski's of this world. Never again will I think that $6000 shower curtains, $2.2 million dollar birthday parties, and $100 billion dollar fleecings of loyal workers and the citizens of California are anything but in my best interests.

From where the sun now sets, I will wear my tin-foil hat no more, forever.

[Fozzy]

What's that noise?..... I think it may be a black helicopter..

[Jackrabbit379]

You're becoming quite the computer Geek there Jack :P

Thank ya, sir. :P I'm learning more every day. :P

[One]

Some people just feel its easier to be disruptive that to actually inform themselves.


http://usinfo.state.gov/wh/americas/...l_meeting.html
nascocorridor.com

[Fozzy]

inform? HAR HAR!!!!!

[PackRatTDI]

> Juan: You Gringos are a bunch of land grabbing
> thieves. Now you want Mexico too? Mexico has its
> rights. You Gringos have no rights in Mexico. Why
> would you want to go there anyway? There is no free
> medical service,schools, or welfare there for
> foreigners such as you. You cannot even own land in my
> country. Stay in the country of your birth.

Sounds like Juan is pretty ignorant of his own country. Mexico has laws granting foreign nationals rights under the Mexican constitution. Foreigners are able to use IMSS hospitals and foreigners CAN own property in Mexico with some limitations (not within 50 km from any border or 100km from the coast.).

[Fozzy]

FOUL FOUL!!! You are not allowed to drag truth and logic into these conspiracy threads... go place your nose in the corner!

[Goin Fer It]

Cluggy619

There is no doubt that there are many forces (people in high places) attempting to have a NAU.

I very much doubt that Senators and others in politics would waste their time and effort putting bills and legislation together to stop such a union if it was not an issue.

The main issue with some is if it would be good or bad for this country. I am against it and I believe it would be harmful for this country and it would change this country as what it was. Those that are for it will yell tinfoil and then horse and buggy days when you bring the issue up.

Goin Fer It's Wife