It should be legal to _________!!!!!

[coastie]

If you are receiving any type of subsidy from the goverment you cannot vote. I would say shoot all Democrats, but they would vote anyway.

Then I could not vote, and be one less to keep the evilcrats out.

[peterbilts suck]

run over a dam 4wheeler

[Fozzy]

If you are receiving any type of subsidy from the goverment you cannot vote. I would say shoot all Democrats, but they would vote anyway.

Did you go to public school? .. I guess the voting blocks just got much smaller than the 30% that bother to vote now..

[wot i life]

it should be legal to kill a reciever that quits his job half way through unloading your truck on your last stop of a friday night

An Italian forktruck driver once left me sitting with one pallet on the trailer while he went for a two hour lunch break.

[golfhobo]

make people pass a knowledge test on the issues before being allowed to vote.

WHY?? The Senate members just voted in a compromise bill on illegal immigration that NOT ONE of them had read yet!! By NOT reading up on anything.... I'm just being WORTHY of my representatives! :shock:

That, and reinstate the poll tax.

For the purpose of disenfranchising the poorer class.

Make it mandatory to own property.

For the purpose of disenfranchising the poorer class.

If you are receiving any type of subsidy from the goverment you cannot vote.

IBID

I would say shoot all Democrats, but they would vote anyway.

Your representation of the Conservative Agenda is quite clear!

But, your LAST line was sort of funny!! Kinda like my completion phrase to the thread question....

Shoot all Conservatives with their OWN guns!!

[terrylamar]

[quote="golfhobo"]

make people pass a knowledge test on the issues before being allowed to vote.

WHY?? The Senate members just voted in a compromise bill on illegal immigration that NOT ONE of them had read yet!! By NOT reading up on anything.... I'm just being WORTHY of my representatives! :shock:

That, and reinstate the poll tax.

For the purpose of disenfranchising the poorer class.

Make it mandatory to own property.

For the purpose of disenfranchising the poorer class.

If you are receiving any type of subsidy from the goverment you cannot vote.

IBID

Strike "the poorer class" and insert "the entitlement class." All you have is a scheme for wealth redistribution and you empower politicians who pander to the the dregs of society.

I would say shoot all Democrats, but they would vote anyway.

Your representation of the Conservative Agenda is quite clear!

And your representation of the Liberial Agenda is quite clear, although misguided.

But, your LAST line was sort of funny!!

But oh so true

Kinda like my completion phrase to the thread question....

Shoot all Conservatives with their OWN guns!!

Yes, well you can try, but you do understand, we have the guns?

[golfhobo]

Strike "the poorer class" and insert "the entitlement class."

So, you are willing to remove yourself from the "entitlement" roles of Social Security benefits?

And you will forego any V.A. benefits for yourself or those who've actually fought to protect this country?

You are willing to have your grandmother, who might be on S.S. to pay FULL price for any and all medical costs incured in her old age?

But, more importantly, you would have a veteran who fought for this country PAY for the right to VOTE?

And strip him of that right ENTIRELY, if he doesn't OWN property?

Yes, well you can try, but you do understand, we have the guns?

And you think the disenfranchised youth and minorities in this country DON'T have guns?? :shock: They've got YOU outgunned PRECISELY because you won't compromise on things like assault weapons bans, etc.

I know you're only joking around, Terry, as I am! You didn't miss the irony (I hope) that I intended by mentioning your OWN guns?

[terrylamar]

Strike "the poorer class" and insert "the entitlement class."

So, you are willing to remove yourself from the "entitlement" roles of Social Security benefits?

Unequivocally, yes.

And you will forego any V.A. benefits for yourself or those who've actually fought to protect this country?

Exceptions would be granted for vetrans. They/we have earned the right.

You are willing to have your grandmother, who might be on S.S. to pay FULL price for any and all medical costs incured in her old age?

My grandmothers and grandfathers are dead. Why do you think I should pay for anyone else's? Pay for your own grandmother's, grandfather's, father's and mother's bills. I don't want to.

But, more importantly, you would have a veteran who fought for this country PAY for the right to VOTE?

Vetrans have already paid for the right.

And strip him of that right ENTIRELY, if he doesn't OWN property?

Vetrans have already earned the right.

Yes, well you can try, but you do understand, we have the guns?

And you think the disenfranchised youth and minorities in this country DON'T have guns?? :shock: They've got YOU outgunned PRECISELY because you won't compromise on things like assault weapons bans, etc.

Now your being silly, disenfranchised youth and minorities having ME outgunned and more importantly, out trained and out committed. This is funny.

I know you're only joking around, Terry, as I am! You didn't miss the irony (I hope) that I intended by mentioning your OWN guns?

About some of it, just as you are. As I see it, our philosophical differences are: You want to treat these people as children taking care of them for life because You know better how to run their lives than they do. I, on the other hand want to treat them as adults, giving them a swift, motivational, kick in the pants if necessary. With me, they will get only the bare minimum to survive. These are the main differences between conservatives and liberals.