Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: ATA wants to have governors in all trucks- 68 mph limit!

  1. #21
    P Jug Joe is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    59

    Default

    These law makers are trying to justify their jobs by constantly passing new laws. The ATA isn't making the laws, but they're asking for more laws. But you listen to the news and there's always some law to restrict our freedoms being debated.

    If you read the petition, you see that they don't have any real justification for their "beliefs" that limiting trucks to 68 will make the highway safer. Like the editorial in the first post says:

    The ATA’s petition to the DOT, NHTSA and FMCSA justified their demand to require governors on trucks by stating that they believe it is necessary to reduce the number and severity of crashes involving large trucks. In their petition, the ATA admits that “many truck-involved crashes in which speed was cited as a factor do not involve speeds in excess of 68 mph.” They also admit that in about half the cases they studied that involved fatalities, the speeds of the truck driver were not recorded. The studies they cite say that speed was a factor in many accidents- but don’t go on to indicate how much of a factor. Begging the question, “if the driver of the large truck had been going 5 miles per hour slower, would the crash have been avoided or been significantly less severe?” And what about the speeds of smaller trucks and cars? Its seems they’ve come up with an unduly strict restriction based on beliefs, assumptions and incomplete data.
    It's BS.

  2. #22
    One's Avatar
    One
    One is offline Senior Board Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    False assumptions and incomplete data is not good enough! You cant make a law based on that! :evil:

  3. This ad will disappear if you login

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0